Cargando…

Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats

BACKGROUND: Stem cell treatment provides a promising therapy for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the applied stem cells exert their effects in different manners that are dependent on the route used for administration. METHODS: In the present study, we administered neural precursors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amemori, Takashi, Ruzicka, Jiri, Romanyuk, Nataliya, Jhanwar-Uniyal, Meena, Sykova, Eva, Jendelova, Pavla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0255-2
_version_ 1782406762452746240
author Amemori, Takashi
Ruzicka, Jiri
Romanyuk, Nataliya
Jhanwar-Uniyal, Meena
Sykova, Eva
Jendelova, Pavla
author_facet Amemori, Takashi
Ruzicka, Jiri
Romanyuk, Nataliya
Jhanwar-Uniyal, Meena
Sykova, Eva
Jendelova, Pavla
author_sort Amemori, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stem cell treatment provides a promising therapy for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the applied stem cells exert their effects in different manners that are dependent on the route used for administration. METHODS: In the present study, we administered neural precursors derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS-NPs) either intraspinally into the lesion center or intrathecally into the subarachnoid space of rats with a balloon-induced spinal cord compression lesion. Functional locomotor performance, cell survival, astrogliosis, axonal sprouting and the expression of endogenous neurotrophic growth factors were evaluated using behavioral tests (BBB, flat beam test, rotarod, plantar test), morphometric analysis, immunohistochemistry and qPCR. RESULTS: Both treatments facilitated the functional locomotor recovery of rats with SCI. iPS-NPs injected intraspinally survived well for 2 months and were positive for MAP2, while cells grafted intrathecally were undetectable at the site of administration or in the spinal cord tissue. Intraspinal implantation increased gray and white matter sparing and axonal sprouting and reduced astrogliosis, while intrathecal application resulted only in an improvement of white matter sparing and an increase in axonal sprouting, in parallel with no positive effect on the expression of endogenous neurotrophic growth factor genes or glial scar reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecally grafted iPS-NPs had a moderate therapeutic benefit on SCI through a paracrine mechanism that does not require the cells to be present in the tissue; however, the extended survival of i.s. grafted cells in the spinal cord may promote long-term spinal cord tissue regeneration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0255-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4688936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46889362015-12-24 Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats Amemori, Takashi Ruzicka, Jiri Romanyuk, Nataliya Jhanwar-Uniyal, Meena Sykova, Eva Jendelova, Pavla Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Stem cell treatment provides a promising therapy for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the applied stem cells exert their effects in different manners that are dependent on the route used for administration. METHODS: In the present study, we administered neural precursors derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS-NPs) either intraspinally into the lesion center or intrathecally into the subarachnoid space of rats with a balloon-induced spinal cord compression lesion. Functional locomotor performance, cell survival, astrogliosis, axonal sprouting and the expression of endogenous neurotrophic growth factors were evaluated using behavioral tests (BBB, flat beam test, rotarod, plantar test), morphometric analysis, immunohistochemistry and qPCR. RESULTS: Both treatments facilitated the functional locomotor recovery of rats with SCI. iPS-NPs injected intraspinally survived well for 2 months and were positive for MAP2, while cells grafted intrathecally were undetectable at the site of administration or in the spinal cord tissue. Intraspinal implantation increased gray and white matter sparing and axonal sprouting and reduced astrogliosis, while intrathecal application resulted only in an improvement of white matter sparing and an increase in axonal sprouting, in parallel with no positive effect on the expression of endogenous neurotrophic growth factor genes or glial scar reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecally grafted iPS-NPs had a moderate therapeutic benefit on SCI through a paracrine mechanism that does not require the cells to be present in the tissue; however, the extended survival of i.s. grafted cells in the spinal cord may promote long-term spinal cord tissue regeneration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0255-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4688936/ /pubmed/26696415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0255-2 Text en © Amemori et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Amemori, Takashi
Ruzicka, Jiri
Romanyuk, Nataliya
Jhanwar-Uniyal, Meena
Sykova, Eva
Jendelova, Pavla
Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title_full Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title_fullStr Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title_short Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
title_sort comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0255-2
work_keys_str_mv AT amemoritakashi comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats
AT ruzickajiri comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats
AT romanyuknataliya comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats
AT jhanwaruniyalmeena comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats
AT sykovaeva comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats
AT jendelovapavla comparisonofintraspinalandintrathecalimplantationofinducedpluripotentstemcellderivedneuralprecursorsforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryinrats