Cargando…

Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs

BACKGROUND: Many people with a terminal illness would prefer to die at home. A new palliative rapid response service (RRS) provided by a large hospice provider in South East England was evaluated (2010) to provide evidence of impact on achieving preferred place of death and costs. The RRS was delive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gage, Heather, Holdsworth, Laura M., Flannery, Caragh, Williams, Peter, Butler, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0065-4
_version_ 1782406767776366592
author Gage, Heather
Holdsworth, Laura M.
Flannery, Caragh
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
author_facet Gage, Heather
Holdsworth, Laura M.
Flannery, Caragh
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
author_sort Gage, Heather
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many people with a terminal illness would prefer to die at home. A new palliative rapid response service (RRS) provided by a large hospice provider in South East England was evaluated (2010) to provide evidence of impact on achieving preferred place of death and costs. The RRS was delivered by a team of trained health care assistants and available 24/7. The purpose of this study was to (i) compare the characteristics of RRS users and non-users, (ii) explore differences in the proportions of users and non-users dying in the place of their choice, (iii) monitor the whole system service utilisation of users and non-users, and compare costs. METHODS: All hospice patients who died with a preferred place of death recorded during an 18 month period were included. Data (demographic, preferences for place of death) were obtained from hospice records. Dying in preferred place was modelled using stepwise logistic regression analysis. Service use data (period between referral to hospice and death) were obtained from general practitioners, community providers, hospitals, social services, hospice, and costs calculated using validated national tariffs. RESULTS: Of 688 patients referred to the hospice when the RRS was operational, 247 (35.9 %) used it. Higher proportions of RRS users than non-users lived in their own homes with a co-resident carer (40.3 % vs. 23.7 %); more non-users lived alone or in residential care (58.8 % vs. 76.3 %). Chances of dying in the preferred place were enhanced 2.1 times by being a RRS user, compared to a non-user, and 1.5 times by having a co-resident carer, compared to living at home alone or in a care home. Total service costs did not differ between users and non-users, except when referred to hospice very close to death (users had higher costs). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the RRS was associated with increased likelihood of dying in the preferred place. The RRS is cost neutral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN32119670, 22 June 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4688966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46889662015-12-24 Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs Gage, Heather Holdsworth, Laura M. Flannery, Caragh Williams, Peter Butler, Claire BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Many people with a terminal illness would prefer to die at home. A new palliative rapid response service (RRS) provided by a large hospice provider in South East England was evaluated (2010) to provide evidence of impact on achieving preferred place of death and costs. The RRS was delivered by a team of trained health care assistants and available 24/7. The purpose of this study was to (i) compare the characteristics of RRS users and non-users, (ii) explore differences in the proportions of users and non-users dying in the place of their choice, (iii) monitor the whole system service utilisation of users and non-users, and compare costs. METHODS: All hospice patients who died with a preferred place of death recorded during an 18 month period were included. Data (demographic, preferences for place of death) were obtained from hospice records. Dying in preferred place was modelled using stepwise logistic regression analysis. Service use data (period between referral to hospice and death) were obtained from general practitioners, community providers, hospitals, social services, hospice, and costs calculated using validated national tariffs. RESULTS: Of 688 patients referred to the hospice when the RRS was operational, 247 (35.9 %) used it. Higher proportions of RRS users than non-users lived in their own homes with a co-resident carer (40.3 % vs. 23.7 %); more non-users lived alone or in residential care (58.8 % vs. 76.3 %). Chances of dying in the preferred place were enhanced 2.1 times by being a RRS user, compared to a non-user, and 1.5 times by having a co-resident carer, compared to living at home alone or in a care home. Total service costs did not differ between users and non-users, except when referred to hospice very close to death (users had higher costs). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the RRS was associated with increased likelihood of dying in the preferred place. The RRS is cost neutral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN32119670, 22 June 2012. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4688966/ /pubmed/26701763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0065-4 Text en © Gage et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gage, Heather
Holdsworth, Laura M.
Flannery, Caragh
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title_full Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title_fullStr Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title_short Impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
title_sort impact of a hospice rapid response service on preferred place of death, and costs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0065-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gageheather impactofahospicerapidresponseserviceonpreferredplaceofdeathandcosts
AT holdsworthlauram impactofahospicerapidresponseserviceonpreferredplaceofdeathandcosts
AT flannerycaragh impactofahospicerapidresponseserviceonpreferredplaceofdeathandcosts
AT williamspeter impactofahospicerapidresponseserviceonpreferredplaceofdeathandcosts
AT butlerclaire impactofahospicerapidresponseserviceonpreferredplaceofdeathandcosts