Cargando…

The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van de Velde, Joris, Wouters, Johan, Vercauteren, Tom, De Gersem, Werner, Achten, Eric, De Neve, Wilfried, Van Hoof, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x
_version_ 1782406771056312320
author Van de Velde, Joris
Wouters, Johan
Vercauteren, Tom
De Gersem, Werner
Achten, Eric
De Neve, Wilfried
Van Hoof, Tom
author_facet Van de Velde, Joris
Wouters, Johan
Vercauteren, Tom
De Gersem, Werner
Achten, Eric
De Neve, Wilfried
Van Hoof, Tom
author_sort Van de Velde, Joris
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accuracy was measured by comparing all generated automatic BP segmentations with anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were included in the study. One atlas was selected as a patient in ADMIRE®, and multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation was first performed with a group of morphometrically preselected atlases. In this group, the atlases were selected on the basis of similarity in the shoulder protraction position with the patient. The number of selected atlases used started at two and increased up to eight. Subsequently, a group of randomly chosen, non-selected atlases were taken. In this second group, every possible combination of 2 to 8 random atlases was used for multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation. For both groups, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI) and Inclusion index (INI) were calculated, measuring the similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation. Similarity indices of both groups were compared using an independent sample t-test, and the optimal number of selected atlases was investigated using an equivalence trial. RESULTS: For each number of atlases, average similarity indices of the morphometrically selected atlas group were significantly higher than the random group (p < 0,05). In this study, the highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases (average DSC = 0,598; average JI = 0,434; average INI = 0,733). CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric atlas selection on the basis of the protraction position of the patient significantly improves multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy. In this study, the optimal number of selected atlases used was six, but for definitive conclusions about the optimal number of atlases and to improve the autosegmentation accuracy for clinical use, more atlases need to be included.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4688981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46889812015-12-24 The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation Van de Velde, Joris Wouters, Johan Vercauteren, Tom De Gersem, Werner Achten, Eric De Neve, Wilfried Van Hoof, Tom Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accuracy was measured by comparing all generated automatic BP segmentations with anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were included in the study. One atlas was selected as a patient in ADMIRE®, and multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation was first performed with a group of morphometrically preselected atlases. In this group, the atlases were selected on the basis of similarity in the shoulder protraction position with the patient. The number of selected atlases used started at two and increased up to eight. Subsequently, a group of randomly chosen, non-selected atlases were taken. In this second group, every possible combination of 2 to 8 random atlases was used for multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation. For both groups, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI) and Inclusion index (INI) were calculated, measuring the similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation. Similarity indices of both groups were compared using an independent sample t-test, and the optimal number of selected atlases was investigated using an equivalence trial. RESULTS: For each number of atlases, average similarity indices of the morphometrically selected atlas group were significantly higher than the random group (p < 0,05). In this study, the highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases (average DSC = 0,598; average JI = 0,434; average INI = 0,733). CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric atlas selection on the basis of the protraction position of the patient significantly improves multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy. In this study, the optimal number of selected atlases used was six, but for definitive conclusions about the optimal number of atlases and to improve the autosegmentation accuracy for clinical use, more atlases need to be included. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4688981/ /pubmed/26696278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x Text en © Van de Velde et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Van de Velde, Joris
Wouters, Johan
Vercauteren, Tom
De Gersem, Werner
Achten, Eric
De Neve, Wilfried
Van Hoof, Tom
The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title_full The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title_fullStr The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title_full_unstemmed The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title_short The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
title_sort effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeveldejoris theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT woutersjohan theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT vercauterentom theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT degersemwerner theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT achteneric theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT denevewilfried theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT vanhooftom theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT vandeveldejoris effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT woutersjohan effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT vercauterentom effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT degersemwerner effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT achteneric effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT denevewilfried effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation
AT vanhooftom effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation