Cargando…
The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accura...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x |
_version_ | 1782406771056312320 |
---|---|
author | Van de Velde, Joris Wouters, Johan Vercauteren, Tom De Gersem, Werner Achten, Eric De Neve, Wilfried Van Hoof, Tom |
author_facet | Van de Velde, Joris Wouters, Johan Vercauteren, Tom De Gersem, Werner Achten, Eric De Neve, Wilfried Van Hoof, Tom |
author_sort | Van de Velde, Joris |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accuracy was measured by comparing all generated automatic BP segmentations with anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were included in the study. One atlas was selected as a patient in ADMIRE®, and multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation was first performed with a group of morphometrically preselected atlases. In this group, the atlases were selected on the basis of similarity in the shoulder protraction position with the patient. The number of selected atlases used started at two and increased up to eight. Subsequently, a group of randomly chosen, non-selected atlases were taken. In this second group, every possible combination of 2 to 8 random atlases was used for multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation. For both groups, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI) and Inclusion index (INI) were calculated, measuring the similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation. Similarity indices of both groups were compared using an independent sample t-test, and the optimal number of selected atlases was investigated using an equivalence trial. RESULTS: For each number of atlases, average similarity indices of the morphometrically selected atlas group were significantly higher than the random group (p < 0,05). In this study, the highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases (average DSC = 0,598; average JI = 0,434; average INI = 0,733). CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric atlas selection on the basis of the protraction position of the patient significantly improves multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy. In this study, the optimal number of selected atlases used was six, but for definitive conclusions about the optimal number of atlases and to improve the autosegmentation accuracy for clinical use, more atlases need to be included. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4688981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46889812015-12-24 The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation Van de Velde, Joris Wouters, Johan Vercauteren, Tom De Gersem, Werner Achten, Eric De Neve, Wilfried Van Hoof, Tom Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the effect of a morphometric atlas selection strategy on the accuracy of multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation using the commercially available software package ADMIRE® and to determine the optimal number of selected atlases to use. Autosegmentation accuracy was measured by comparing all generated automatic BP segmentations with anatomically validated gold standard segmentations that were developed using cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaver computed tomography (CT) atlases were included in the study. One atlas was selected as a patient in ADMIRE®, and multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation was first performed with a group of morphometrically preselected atlases. In this group, the atlases were selected on the basis of similarity in the shoulder protraction position with the patient. The number of selected atlases used started at two and increased up to eight. Subsequently, a group of randomly chosen, non-selected atlases were taken. In this second group, every possible combination of 2 to 8 random atlases was used for multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation. For both groups, the average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI) and Inclusion index (INI) were calculated, measuring the similarity of the generated automatic BP segmentations and the gold standard segmentation. Similarity indices of both groups were compared using an independent sample t-test, and the optimal number of selected atlases was investigated using an equivalence trial. RESULTS: For each number of atlases, average similarity indices of the morphometrically selected atlas group were significantly higher than the random group (p < 0,05). In this study, the highest similarity indices were achieved using multi-atlas autosegmentation with 6 selected atlases (average DSC = 0,598; average JI = 0,434; average INI = 0,733). CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric atlas selection on the basis of the protraction position of the patient significantly improves multi-atlas-based BP autosegmentation accuracy. In this study, the optimal number of selected atlases used was six, but for definitive conclusions about the optimal number of atlases and to improve the autosegmentation accuracy for clinical use, more atlases need to be included. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4688981/ /pubmed/26696278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x Text en © Van de Velde et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Van de Velde, Joris Wouters, Johan Vercauteren, Tom De Gersem, Werner Achten, Eric De Neve, Wilfried Van Hoof, Tom The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title | The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title_full | The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title_fullStr | The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title_short | The effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
title_sort | effect of morphometric atlas selection on multi-atlas-based automatic brachial plexus segmentation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0570-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandeveldejoris theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT woutersjohan theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT vercauterentom theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT degersemwerner theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT achteneric theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT denevewilfried theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT vanhooftom theeffectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT vandeveldejoris effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT woutersjohan effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT vercauterentom effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT degersemwerner effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT achteneric effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT denevewilfried effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation AT vanhooftom effectofmorphometricatlasselectiononmultiatlasbasedautomaticbrachialplexussegmentation |