Cargando…

Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke

Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawson, Jesse, Pierce, David, Dixit, Anand, Kimberley, Teresa J., Robertson, Michele, Tarver, Brent, Hilmi, Omar, McLean, John, Forbes, Kirsten, Kilgard, Michael P., Rennaker, Robert L., Cramer, Steven C., Walters, Matthew, Engineer, Navzer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477
_version_ 1782406807313973248
author Dawson, Jesse
Pierce, David
Dixit, Anand
Kimberley, Teresa J.
Robertson, Michele
Tarver, Brent
Hilmi, Omar
McLean, John
Forbes, Kirsten
Kilgard, Michael P.
Rennaker, Robert L.
Cramer, Steven C.
Walters, Matthew
Engineer, Navzer
author_facet Dawson, Jesse
Pierce, David
Dixit, Anand
Kimberley, Teresa J.
Robertson, Michele
Tarver, Brent
Hilmi, Omar
McLean, John
Forbes, Kirsten
Kilgard, Michael P.
Rennaker, Robert L.
Cramer, Steven C.
Walters, Matthew
Engineer, Navzer
author_sort Dawson, Jesse
collection PubMed
description Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb function after ischemic stroke. METHODS—: Twenty-one participants with ischemic stroke >6 months before and moderate to severe upper-limb impairment were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone. Rehabilitation consisted of three 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks, each involving >400 movement trials. In the VNS group, movements were paired with 0.5-second VNS. The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility. Secondary end points included change in upper-limb measures (including the Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). RESULTS—: Nine participants were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation and 11 to rehabilitation alone. There were no serious adverse device effects. One patient had transient vocal cord palsy and dysphagia after implantation. Five had minor adverse device effects including nausea and taste disturbance on the evening of therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores was not significantly different (between-group difference, 5.7 points; 95% confidence interval, −0.4 to 11.8). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a significant difference in change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score (between-group difference, 6.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 12.6). CONCLUSIONS—: This study suggests that VNS paired with rehabilitation is feasible and has not raised safety concerns. Additional studies of VNS in adults with chronic stroke will now be performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01669161.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4689175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46891752015-12-28 Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke Dawson, Jesse Pierce, David Dixit, Anand Kimberley, Teresa J. Robertson, Michele Tarver, Brent Hilmi, Omar McLean, John Forbes, Kirsten Kilgard, Michael P. Rennaker, Robert L. Cramer, Steven C. Walters, Matthew Engineer, Navzer Stroke Original Contributions Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb function after ischemic stroke. METHODS—: Twenty-one participants with ischemic stroke >6 months before and moderate to severe upper-limb impairment were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone. Rehabilitation consisted of three 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks, each involving >400 movement trials. In the VNS group, movements were paired with 0.5-second VNS. The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility. Secondary end points included change in upper-limb measures (including the Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). RESULTS—: Nine participants were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation and 11 to rehabilitation alone. There were no serious adverse device effects. One patient had transient vocal cord palsy and dysphagia after implantation. Five had minor adverse device effects including nausea and taste disturbance on the evening of therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores was not significantly different (between-group difference, 5.7 points; 95% confidence interval, −0.4 to 11.8). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a significant difference in change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score (between-group difference, 6.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 12.6). CONCLUSIONS—: This study suggests that VNS paired with rehabilitation is feasible and has not raised safety concerns. Additional studies of VNS in adults with chronic stroke will now be performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01669161. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-01 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4689175/ /pubmed/26645257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Dawson, Jesse
Pierce, David
Dixit, Anand
Kimberley, Teresa J.
Robertson, Michele
Tarver, Brent
Hilmi, Omar
McLean, John
Forbes, Kirsten
Kilgard, Michael P.
Rennaker, Robert L.
Cramer, Steven C.
Walters, Matthew
Engineer, Navzer
Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title_full Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title_short Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
title_sort safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477
work_keys_str_mv AT dawsonjesse safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT piercedavid safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT dixitanand safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT kimberleyteresaj safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT robertsonmichele safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT tarverbrent safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT hilmiomar safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT mcleanjohn safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT forbeskirsten safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT kilgardmichaelp safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT rennakerrobertl safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT cramerstevenc safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT waltersmatthew safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke
AT engineernavzer safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke