Cargando…
Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb functi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477 |
_version_ | 1782406807313973248 |
---|---|
author | Dawson, Jesse Pierce, David Dixit, Anand Kimberley, Teresa J. Robertson, Michele Tarver, Brent Hilmi, Omar McLean, John Forbes, Kirsten Kilgard, Michael P. Rennaker, Robert L. Cramer, Steven C. Walters, Matthew Engineer, Navzer |
author_facet | Dawson, Jesse Pierce, David Dixit, Anand Kimberley, Teresa J. Robertson, Michele Tarver, Brent Hilmi, Omar McLean, John Forbes, Kirsten Kilgard, Michael P. Rennaker, Robert L. Cramer, Steven C. Walters, Matthew Engineer, Navzer |
author_sort | Dawson, Jesse |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb function after ischemic stroke. METHODS—: Twenty-one participants with ischemic stroke >6 months before and moderate to severe upper-limb impairment were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone. Rehabilitation consisted of three 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks, each involving >400 movement trials. In the VNS group, movements were paired with 0.5-second VNS. The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility. Secondary end points included change in upper-limb measures (including the Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). RESULTS—: Nine participants were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation and 11 to rehabilitation alone. There were no serious adverse device effects. One patient had transient vocal cord palsy and dysphagia after implantation. Five had minor adverse device effects including nausea and taste disturbance on the evening of therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores was not significantly different (between-group difference, 5.7 points; 95% confidence interval, −0.4 to 11.8). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a significant difference in change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score (between-group difference, 6.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 12.6). CONCLUSIONS—: This study suggests that VNS paired with rehabilitation is feasible and has not raised safety concerns. Additional studies of VNS in adults with chronic stroke will now be performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01669161. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4689175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46891752015-12-28 Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke Dawson, Jesse Pierce, David Dixit, Anand Kimberley, Teresa J. Robertson, Michele Tarver, Brent Hilmi, Omar McLean, John Forbes, Kirsten Kilgard, Michael P. Rennaker, Robert L. Cramer, Steven C. Walters, Matthew Engineer, Navzer Stroke Original Contributions Recent animal studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with movement induces movement-specific plasticity in motor cortex and improves forelimb function after stroke. We conducted a randomized controlled clinical pilot study of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper-limb function after ischemic stroke. METHODS—: Twenty-one participants with ischemic stroke >6 months before and moderate to severe upper-limb impairment were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone. Rehabilitation consisted of three 2-hour sessions per week for 6 weeks, each involving >400 movement trials. In the VNS group, movements were paired with 0.5-second VNS. The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility. Secondary end points included change in upper-limb measures (including the Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). RESULTS—: Nine participants were randomized to VNS plus rehabilitation and 11 to rehabilitation alone. There were no serious adverse device effects. One patient had transient vocal cord palsy and dysphagia after implantation. Five had minor adverse device effects including nausea and taste disturbance on the evening of therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores was not significantly different (between-group difference, 5.7 points; 95% confidence interval, −0.4 to 11.8). In the per-protocol analysis, there was a significant difference in change in Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score (between-group difference, 6.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 12.6). CONCLUSIONS—: This study suggests that VNS paired with rehabilitation is feasible and has not raised safety concerns. Additional studies of VNS in adults with chronic stroke will now be performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01669161. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-01 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4689175/ /pubmed/26645257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Dawson, Jesse Pierce, David Dixit, Anand Kimberley, Teresa J. Robertson, Michele Tarver, Brent Hilmi, Omar McLean, John Forbes, Kirsten Kilgard, Michael P. Rennaker, Robert L. Cramer, Steven C. Walters, Matthew Engineer, Navzer Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title | Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dawsonjesse safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT piercedavid safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT dixitanand safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT kimberleyteresaj safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT robertsonmichele safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT tarverbrent safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT hilmiomar safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT mcleanjohn safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT forbeskirsten safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT kilgardmichaelp safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT rennakerrobertl safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT cramerstevenc safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT waltersmatthew safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke AT engineernavzer safetyfeasibilityandefficacyofvagusnervestimulationpairedwithupperlimbrehabilitationafterischemicstroke |