Cargando…

Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND: Meeting the challenge of tuberculosis (TB) elimination will require adopting new models of delivering patient-centered care customized to diverse settings and contexts. In areas of low incidence with cases spread out across jurisdictions and large geographic areas, a “virtual” model is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Richard, Heffernan, Courtney, Gao, Zhiwei, Egedahl, Mary Lou, Talbot, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144784
_version_ 1782406832774447104
author Long, Richard
Heffernan, Courtney
Gao, Zhiwei
Egedahl, Mary Lou
Talbot, James
author_facet Long, Richard
Heffernan, Courtney
Gao, Zhiwei
Egedahl, Mary Lou
Talbot, James
author_sort Long, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meeting the challenge of tuberculosis (TB) elimination will require adopting new models of delivering patient-centered care customized to diverse settings and contexts. In areas of low incidence with cases spread out across jurisdictions and large geographic areas, a “virtual” model is attractive. However, whether “virtual” clinics and telemedicine deliver the same outcomes as face-to-face encounters in general and within the sphere of public health in particular, is unknown. This evidence is generated here by analyzing outcomes between the “virtual” and “outpatient” public health TB clinics in Alberta, a province of Western Canada with a large geographic area and relatively small population. METHODS: In response to the challenge of delivering equitable TB services over long distances and to hard to reach communities, Alberta established three public health clinics for the delivery of its program: two outpatient serving major metropolitan areas, and one virtual serving mainly rural areas. The virtual clinic receives paper-based or electronic referrals and generates directives which are acted upon by local providers. Clinics are staffed by dedicated public health nurses and university-based TB physicians. Performance of the two types of clinics is compared between the years 2008 and 2012 using 16 case management and treatment outcome indicators and 12 contact management indicators. FINDINGS: In the outpatient and virtual clinics, respectively, 691 and 150 cases and their contacts were managed. Individually and together both types of clinics met most performance targets. Compared to outpatient clinics, virtual clinic performance was comparable, superior and inferior in 22, 3, and 3 indicators, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient and virtual public health TB clinics perform equally well. In low incidence settings a combination of the two clinic types has the potential to address issues around equitable service delivery and declining expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4689372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46893722015-12-31 Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada Long, Richard Heffernan, Courtney Gao, Zhiwei Egedahl, Mary Lou Talbot, James PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Meeting the challenge of tuberculosis (TB) elimination will require adopting new models of delivering patient-centered care customized to diverse settings and contexts. In areas of low incidence with cases spread out across jurisdictions and large geographic areas, a “virtual” model is attractive. However, whether “virtual” clinics and telemedicine deliver the same outcomes as face-to-face encounters in general and within the sphere of public health in particular, is unknown. This evidence is generated here by analyzing outcomes between the “virtual” and “outpatient” public health TB clinics in Alberta, a province of Western Canada with a large geographic area and relatively small population. METHODS: In response to the challenge of delivering equitable TB services over long distances and to hard to reach communities, Alberta established three public health clinics for the delivery of its program: two outpatient serving major metropolitan areas, and one virtual serving mainly rural areas. The virtual clinic receives paper-based or electronic referrals and generates directives which are acted upon by local providers. Clinics are staffed by dedicated public health nurses and university-based TB physicians. Performance of the two types of clinics is compared between the years 2008 and 2012 using 16 case management and treatment outcome indicators and 12 contact management indicators. FINDINGS: In the outpatient and virtual clinics, respectively, 691 and 150 cases and their contacts were managed. Individually and together both types of clinics met most performance targets. Compared to outpatient clinics, virtual clinic performance was comparable, superior and inferior in 22, 3, and 3 indicators, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient and virtual public health TB clinics perform equally well. In low incidence settings a combination of the two clinic types has the potential to address issues around equitable service delivery and declining expertise. Public Library of Science 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4689372/ /pubmed/26700163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144784 Text en © 2015 Long et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Long, Richard
Heffernan, Courtney
Gao, Zhiwei
Egedahl, Mary Lou
Talbot, James
Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title_full Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title_fullStr Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title_short Do “Virtual” and “Outpatient” Public Health Tuberculosis Clinics Perform Equally Well? A Program-Wide Evaluation in Alberta, Canada
title_sort do “virtual” and “outpatient” public health tuberculosis clinics perform equally well? a program-wide evaluation in alberta, canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144784
work_keys_str_mv AT longrichard dovirtualandoutpatientpublichealthtuberculosisclinicsperformequallywellaprogramwideevaluationinalbertacanada
AT heffernancourtney dovirtualandoutpatientpublichealthtuberculosisclinicsperformequallywellaprogramwideevaluationinalbertacanada
AT gaozhiwei dovirtualandoutpatientpublichealthtuberculosisclinicsperformequallywellaprogramwideevaluationinalbertacanada
AT egedahlmarylou dovirtualandoutpatientpublichealthtuberculosisclinicsperformequallywellaprogramwideevaluationinalbertacanada
AT talbotjames dovirtualandoutpatientpublichealthtuberculosisclinicsperformequallywellaprogramwideevaluationinalbertacanada