Cargando…

Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population

BACKGROUND: Truncating titin (TTN) mutations, especially in A-band region, represent the most common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Clinical interpretation of these variants can be challenging, as these variants are also present in reference populations. We carried out systematic analyses of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akinrinade, Oyediran, Koskenvuo, Juha W., Alastalo, Tero-Pekka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145284
_version_ 1782406839821926400
author Akinrinade, Oyediran
Koskenvuo, Juha W.
Alastalo, Tero-Pekka
author_facet Akinrinade, Oyediran
Koskenvuo, Juha W.
Alastalo, Tero-Pekka
author_sort Akinrinade, Oyediran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Truncating titin (TTN) mutations, especially in A-band region, represent the most common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Clinical interpretation of these variants can be challenging, as these variants are also present in reference populations. We carried out systematic analyses of TTN truncating variants (TTNtv) in publicly available reference populations, including, for the first time, data from Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). The goal was to establish more accurate estimate of prevalence of different TTNtv to allow better clinical interpretation of these findings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) and ExAC, we estimated the prevalence of TTNtv in the population. In the three population datasets, 52–54% of TTNtv were not affecting all TTN transcripts. The frequency of truncations affecting all transcripts in ExAC was 0.36% (0.32% - 0.41%, 95% CI) and 0.19% (0.16% - 0.23%, 95% CI) for those affecting the A-band. In the A-band region, the prevalences of frameshift, nonsense and essential splice site variants were 0.057%, 0.090%, and 0.047% respectively. Cga/Tga (arginine/nonsense–R/*) transitional change at CpG mutation hotspots was the most frequent type of TTN nonsense mutation accounting for 91.3% (21/23) of arginine residue nonsense mutation (R/*) at TTN A-band region. Non-essential splice-site variants had significantly lower proportion of private variants and higher proportion of low-frequency variants compared to essential splice-site variants (P = 0.01; P = 5.1 X 10(−4), respectively). CONCLUSION: A-band TTNtv are more rare in the general population than previously reported. Based on this analysis, one in 500 carries a truncation in TTN A-band suggesting the penetrance of these potentially harmful variants is still poorly understood, and some of these variants do not manifest as autosomal dominant DCM. This calls for caution when interpreting TTNtv in individuals and families with no history of DCM. Considering the size of TTN, expertise in DNA library preparation, high coverage NGS strategies, validated bioinformatics approach, accurate variant assessment strategy, and confirmatory sequencing are prerequisites for reliable evaluation of TTN in clinical settings, and ideally with the inclusion of mRNA and/or protein level assessment for a definite diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4689403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46894032015-12-31 Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population Akinrinade, Oyediran Koskenvuo, Juha W. Alastalo, Tero-Pekka PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Truncating titin (TTN) mutations, especially in A-band region, represent the most common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Clinical interpretation of these variants can be challenging, as these variants are also present in reference populations. We carried out systematic analyses of TTN truncating variants (TTNtv) in publicly available reference populations, including, for the first time, data from Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). The goal was to establish more accurate estimate of prevalence of different TTNtv to allow better clinical interpretation of these findings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) and ExAC, we estimated the prevalence of TTNtv in the population. In the three population datasets, 52–54% of TTNtv were not affecting all TTN transcripts. The frequency of truncations affecting all transcripts in ExAC was 0.36% (0.32% - 0.41%, 95% CI) and 0.19% (0.16% - 0.23%, 95% CI) for those affecting the A-band. In the A-band region, the prevalences of frameshift, nonsense and essential splice site variants were 0.057%, 0.090%, and 0.047% respectively. Cga/Tga (arginine/nonsense–R/*) transitional change at CpG mutation hotspots was the most frequent type of TTN nonsense mutation accounting for 91.3% (21/23) of arginine residue nonsense mutation (R/*) at TTN A-band region. Non-essential splice-site variants had significantly lower proportion of private variants and higher proportion of low-frequency variants compared to essential splice-site variants (P = 0.01; P = 5.1 X 10(−4), respectively). CONCLUSION: A-band TTNtv are more rare in the general population than previously reported. Based on this analysis, one in 500 carries a truncation in TTN A-band suggesting the penetrance of these potentially harmful variants is still poorly understood, and some of these variants do not manifest as autosomal dominant DCM. This calls for caution when interpreting TTNtv in individuals and families with no history of DCM. Considering the size of TTN, expertise in DNA library preparation, high coverage NGS strategies, validated bioinformatics approach, accurate variant assessment strategy, and confirmatory sequencing are prerequisites for reliable evaluation of TTN in clinical settings, and ideally with the inclusion of mRNA and/or protein level assessment for a definite diagnosis. Public Library of Science 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4689403/ /pubmed/26701604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145284 Text en © 2015 Akinrinade et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akinrinade, Oyediran
Koskenvuo, Juha W.
Alastalo, Tero-Pekka
Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title_full Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title_fullStr Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title_short Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population
title_sort prevalence of titin truncating variants in general population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145284
work_keys_str_mv AT akinrinadeoyediran prevalenceoftitintruncatingvariantsingeneralpopulation
AT koskenvuojuhaw prevalenceoftitintruncatingvariantsingeneralpopulation
AT alastaloteropekka prevalenceoftitintruncatingvariantsingeneralpopulation