Cargando…

Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?

BACKGROUND: Judgements of volume may influence the rate of consumption of alcohol and, in turn, the amount consumed. The aim of the current study was to examine the impact of the size and shape of wine glasses on perceptions of wine volume. METHODS: Online experiment: Participants (n = 360; recruite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pechey, Rachel, Attwood, Angela S., Couturier, Dominique-Laurent, Munafò, Marcus R., Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E., Woods, Andy, Marteau, Theresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26698577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144536
_version_ 1782406861544226816
author Pechey, Rachel
Attwood, Angela S.
Couturier, Dominique-Laurent
Munafò, Marcus R.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Woods, Andy
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_facet Pechey, Rachel
Attwood, Angela S.
Couturier, Dominique-Laurent
Munafò, Marcus R.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Woods, Andy
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_sort Pechey, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Judgements of volume may influence the rate of consumption of alcohol and, in turn, the amount consumed. The aim of the current study was to examine the impact of the size and shape of wine glasses on perceptions of wine volume. METHODS: Online experiment: Participants (n = 360; recruited via Mechanical Turk) were asked to match the volume of wine in two wine glasses, specifically: 1. the Reference glass holding a fixed reference volume, and 2. the Comparison glass, for which the volume could be altered until participants perceived it matched the reference volume. One of three comparison glasses was shown in each trial: ‘wider’ (20% wider but same capacity); ‘larger’ (same width but 25% greater capacity); or ‘wider-and-larger’ (20% wider and 25% greater capacity). Reference volumes were 125ml, 175ml and 250ml, in a fully factorial within-subjects design: 3 (comparison glass) x 3 (reference volume). Non-zero differences between the volumes with which participants filled comparison glasses and the corresponding reference volumes were identified using sign-rank tests. RESULTS: Participants under-filled the wider glass relative to the reference glass for larger reference volumes, and over-filled the larger glass relative to the reference glass for all reference volumes. Results for the wider-and-larger glass showed a mixed pattern across reference volume. For all comparison glasses, in trials with larger reference volumes participants tended to fill the comparison glass less, relative to trials with smaller reference volumes for the same comparison glass. CONCLUSIONS: These results are broadly consistent with people using the relative fullness of glasses to judge volume, and suggest both the shape and capacity of wine glasses may influence perceived volume. Perceptions that smaller glasses contain more than larger ones (despite containing the same volume), could slow drinking speed and overall consumption by serving standard portions in smaller glasses. This hypothesis awaits testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4689536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46895362015-12-31 Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine? Pechey, Rachel Attwood, Angela S. Couturier, Dominique-Laurent Munafò, Marcus R. Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Woods, Andy Marteau, Theresa M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Judgements of volume may influence the rate of consumption of alcohol and, in turn, the amount consumed. The aim of the current study was to examine the impact of the size and shape of wine glasses on perceptions of wine volume. METHODS: Online experiment: Participants (n = 360; recruited via Mechanical Turk) were asked to match the volume of wine in two wine glasses, specifically: 1. the Reference glass holding a fixed reference volume, and 2. the Comparison glass, for which the volume could be altered until participants perceived it matched the reference volume. One of three comparison glasses was shown in each trial: ‘wider’ (20% wider but same capacity); ‘larger’ (same width but 25% greater capacity); or ‘wider-and-larger’ (20% wider and 25% greater capacity). Reference volumes were 125ml, 175ml and 250ml, in a fully factorial within-subjects design: 3 (comparison glass) x 3 (reference volume). Non-zero differences between the volumes with which participants filled comparison glasses and the corresponding reference volumes were identified using sign-rank tests. RESULTS: Participants under-filled the wider glass relative to the reference glass for larger reference volumes, and over-filled the larger glass relative to the reference glass for all reference volumes. Results for the wider-and-larger glass showed a mixed pattern across reference volume. For all comparison glasses, in trials with larger reference volumes participants tended to fill the comparison glass less, relative to trials with smaller reference volumes for the same comparison glass. CONCLUSIONS: These results are broadly consistent with people using the relative fullness of glasses to judge volume, and suggest both the shape and capacity of wine glasses may influence perceived volume. Perceptions that smaller glasses contain more than larger ones (despite containing the same volume), could slow drinking speed and overall consumption by serving standard portions in smaller glasses. This hypothesis awaits testing. Public Library of Science 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4689536/ /pubmed/26698577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144536 Text en © 2015 Pechey et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pechey, Rachel
Attwood, Angela S.
Couturier, Dominique-Laurent
Munafò, Marcus R.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Woods, Andy
Marteau, Theresa M.
Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title_full Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title_fullStr Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title_full_unstemmed Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title_short Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine?
title_sort does glass size and shape influence judgements of the volume of wine?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26698577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144536
work_keys_str_mv AT pecheyrachel doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT attwoodangelas doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT couturierdominiquelaurent doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT munafomarcusr doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT scottsamuelnicholase doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT woodsandy doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine
AT marteautheresam doesglasssizeandshapeinfluencejudgementsofthevolumeofwine