Cargando…

Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Area Measured by Computed Tomography with That Estimated by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Method in Korean Subjects

We evaluated the concordance between visceral fat area (VFA) estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or computed tomography (CT) in Korean subjects with a wide range in age and body mass index (BMI). In 1006 individuals (mean age 55.2 ± 11.8 (19–87) years, mean BMI 26.0 ± 3.5 (17–46) kg/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Dong-Hwa, Park, Kyeong Seon, Ahn, Soyeon, Ku, Eu Jeong, Jung, Kyong Yeun, Kim, Yoon Ji, Kim, Kyoung Min, Moon, Jae Hoon, Choi, Sung Hee, Park, Kyong Soo, Jang, Hak Chul, Lim, Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7125548
Descripción
Sumario:We evaluated the concordance between visceral fat area (VFA) estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or computed tomography (CT) in Korean subjects with a wide range in age and body mass index (BMI). In 1006 individuals (mean age 55.2 ± 11.8 (19–87) years, mean BMI 26.0 ± 3.5 (17–46) kg/m(2), 48.9% men), VFA quantified by CT was compared with VFA using multifrequency BIA machines within 15 days. Concordance rates were compared by age or BMI using correlation analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Using BIA data, we established a regression formula to reflect CT-VFA. The mean VFAs by CT and BIA were 131.9 ± 57.3 cm(2) and 110.5 ± 33.9 cm(2), respectively (r = 0.605, p < 0.001). The mean difference was 21.4 ± 45.6 cm(2), tending to increase with BMI. In women with BMI <25 kg/m(2) or age <50 years, the VFAs by BIA were similar to those by CT (ICC = 0.496 in BMI <25 kg/m(2) and ICC = 0.638 in age <50 years). However, the difference was greater in men with BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) or age ≥50 years. Applying our formula, the difference between estimations decreased to 0.2 ± 38.2cm(2). VFA estimated by BIA correlated well with that by CT, but a more accurate formula is needed to match CT data, particularly in older men or subjects with a high BMI.