Cargando…
Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness
OBJECTIVE: (Primary) To establish the effect of antenatal group self-hypnosis for nulliparous women on intra-partum epidural use. DESIGN: Multi-method randomised control trial (RCT). SETTING: Three NHS Trusts. POPULATION: Nulliparous women not planning elective caesarean, without medication for hype...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13433 |
_version_ | 1782406968850251776 |
---|---|
author | Downe, S Finlayson, K Melvin, C Spiby, H Ali, S Diggle, P Gyte, G Hinder, S Miller, V Slade, P Trepel, D Weeks, A Whorwell, P Williamson, M |
author_facet | Downe, S Finlayson, K Melvin, C Spiby, H Ali, S Diggle, P Gyte, G Hinder, S Miller, V Slade, P Trepel, D Weeks, A Whorwell, P Williamson, M |
author_sort | Downe, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: (Primary) To establish the effect of antenatal group self-hypnosis for nulliparous women on intra-partum epidural use. DESIGN: Multi-method randomised control trial (RCT). SETTING: Three NHS Trusts. POPULATION: Nulliparous women not planning elective caesarean, without medication for hypertension and without psychological illness. METHODS: Randomisation at 28–32 weeks’ gestation to usual care, or to usual care plus brief self-hypnosis training (two × 90-minute groups at around 32 and 35 weeks’ gestation; daily audio self-hypnosis CD). Follow up at 2 and 6 weeks postnatal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: epidural analgesia. Secondary: associated clinical and psychological outcomes; cost analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty women were randomised. There was no statistically significant difference in epidural use: 27.9% (intervention), 30.3% (control), odds ratio (OR) 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–1.24], or in 27 of 29 pre-specified secondary clinical and psychological outcomes. Women in the intervention group had lower actual than anticipated levels of fear and anxiety between baseline and 2 weeks post natal (anxiety: mean difference −0.72, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.28, P = 0.001); fear (mean difference −0.62, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.16, P = 0.009) [Correction added on 7 July 2015, after first online publication: ‘Mean difference’ replaced ‘Odds ratio (OR)’ in the preceding sentence.]. Postnatal response rates were 67% overall at 2 weeks. The additional cost in the intervention arm per woman was £4.83 (CI −£257.93 to £267.59). CONCLUSIONS: Allocation to two-third-trimester group self-hypnosis training sessions did not significantly reduce intra-partum epidural analgesia use or a range of other clinical and psychological variables. The impact of women's anxiety and fear about childbirth needs further investigation. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Going to 2 prenatal self-hypnosis groups didn't reduce labour epidural use but did reduce birth fear & anxiety postnatally at < £5 per woman. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4690197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46901972016-01-04 Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness Downe, S Finlayson, K Melvin, C Spiby, H Ali, S Diggle, P Gyte, G Hinder, S Miller, V Slade, P Trepel, D Weeks, A Whorwell, P Williamson, M BJOG Intrapartum Care OBJECTIVE: (Primary) To establish the effect of antenatal group self-hypnosis for nulliparous women on intra-partum epidural use. DESIGN: Multi-method randomised control trial (RCT). SETTING: Three NHS Trusts. POPULATION: Nulliparous women not planning elective caesarean, without medication for hypertension and without psychological illness. METHODS: Randomisation at 28–32 weeks’ gestation to usual care, or to usual care plus brief self-hypnosis training (two × 90-minute groups at around 32 and 35 weeks’ gestation; daily audio self-hypnosis CD). Follow up at 2 and 6 weeks postnatal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: epidural analgesia. Secondary: associated clinical and psychological outcomes; cost analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty women were randomised. There was no statistically significant difference in epidural use: 27.9% (intervention), 30.3% (control), odds ratio (OR) 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–1.24], or in 27 of 29 pre-specified secondary clinical and psychological outcomes. Women in the intervention group had lower actual than anticipated levels of fear and anxiety between baseline and 2 weeks post natal (anxiety: mean difference −0.72, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.28, P = 0.001); fear (mean difference −0.62, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.16, P = 0.009) [Correction added on 7 July 2015, after first online publication: ‘Mean difference’ replaced ‘Odds ratio (OR)’ in the preceding sentence.]. Postnatal response rates were 67% overall at 2 weeks. The additional cost in the intervention arm per woman was £4.83 (CI −£257.93 to £267.59). CONCLUSIONS: Allocation to two-third-trimester group self-hypnosis training sessions did not significantly reduce intra-partum epidural analgesia use or a range of other clinical and psychological variables. The impact of women's anxiety and fear about childbirth needs further investigation. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Going to 2 prenatal self-hypnosis groups didn't reduce labour epidural use but did reduce birth fear & anxiety postnatally at < £5 per woman. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015-08 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4690197/ /pubmed/25958769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13433 Text en © 2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Intrapartum Care Downe, S Finlayson, K Melvin, C Spiby, H Ali, S Diggle, P Gyte, G Hinder, S Miller, V Slade, P Trepel, D Weeks, A Whorwell, P Williamson, M Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title | Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title_full | Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title_fullStr | Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title_short | Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
title_sort | self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness |
topic | Intrapartum Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT downes selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT finlaysonk selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT melvinc selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT spibyh selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT alis selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT digglep selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT gyteg selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT hinders selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT millerv selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT sladep selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT trepeld selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT weeksa selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT whorwellp selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness AT williamsonm selfhypnosisforintrapartumpainmanagementinpregnantnulliparouswomenarandomisedcontrolledtrialofclinicaleffectiveness |