Cargando…

Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic tools for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs are useful in mapping the distribution of the disease, delineating areas where mass drug administrations (MDA) are required, and determining when to stop MDA. The prevalence and burden of LF have been drastically reduced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline, Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C., Bopda, Jean, Akame, Julie, Tarini, Ann, Kamgno, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1317-x
_version_ 1782406979096936448
author Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C.
Bopda, Jean
Akame, Julie
Tarini, Ann
Kamgno, Joseph
author_facet Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C.
Bopda, Jean
Akame, Julie
Tarini, Ann
Kamgno, Joseph
author_sort Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic tools for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs are useful in mapping the distribution of the disease, delineating areas where mass drug administrations (MDA) are required, and determining when to stop MDA. The prevalence and burden of LF have been drastically reduced following mass treatments, and the evaluation of the performance of circulating filarial antigen (CFA)-based assays was acknowledged to be of high interest in areas with low residual LF endemicity rates after multiple rounds of MDA. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the immunochromatographic test (ICT) sensitivity in low endemicity settings and, specifically, in individuals with low intensity of lymphatic filariasis infection. METHODS: To perform this study, calibrated thick blood smears, ICT and Og4C3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were carried out by night to identify Wuchereria bancrofti microfilarial and circulating filarial antigen carriers. A threshold determination assay regarding ICT and ELISA was performed using serial plasma dilutions from individuals with positive microfilarial counts. RESULTS: All individuals harbouring microfilariae (positive blood films) were detected by ICT and ELISA, but among individuals positive for ELISA, only 35.7 % of them were detected using ICT (Chi square: 4.57; p-value = 0.03), indicating a moderate agreement between both tests (kappa statistics = 0.49). Threshold determination analyses showed that ELISA was still positive at the last plasma dilution with negative ICT result. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a loss of sensitivity for ICT in low endemicity settings, especially in people exhibiting low levels of circulating filarial antigen, raising serious concern regarding the monitoring and evaluation procedures in the framework of LF elimination program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1317-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46902542015-12-25 Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C. Bopda, Jean Akame, Julie Tarini, Ann Kamgno, Joseph BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic tools for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs are useful in mapping the distribution of the disease, delineating areas where mass drug administrations (MDA) are required, and determining when to stop MDA. The prevalence and burden of LF have been drastically reduced following mass treatments, and the evaluation of the performance of circulating filarial antigen (CFA)-based assays was acknowledged to be of high interest in areas with low residual LF endemicity rates after multiple rounds of MDA. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the immunochromatographic test (ICT) sensitivity in low endemicity settings and, specifically, in individuals with low intensity of lymphatic filariasis infection. METHODS: To perform this study, calibrated thick blood smears, ICT and Og4C3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were carried out by night to identify Wuchereria bancrofti microfilarial and circulating filarial antigen carriers. A threshold determination assay regarding ICT and ELISA was performed using serial plasma dilutions from individuals with positive microfilarial counts. RESULTS: All individuals harbouring microfilariae (positive blood films) were detected by ICT and ELISA, but among individuals positive for ELISA, only 35.7 % of them were detected using ICT (Chi square: 4.57; p-value = 0.03), indicating a moderate agreement between both tests (kappa statistics = 0.49). Threshold determination analyses showed that ELISA was still positive at the last plasma dilution with negative ICT result. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a loss of sensitivity for ICT in low endemicity settings, especially in people exhibiting low levels of circulating filarial antigen, raising serious concern regarding the monitoring and evaluation procedures in the framework of LF elimination program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1317-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4690254/ /pubmed/26700472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1317-x Text en © Gounoue-Kamkumo et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gounoue-Kamkumo, Raceline
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C.
Bopda, Jean
Akame, Julie
Tarini, Ann
Kamgno, Joseph
Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title_full Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title_fullStr Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title_full_unstemmed Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title_short Loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ICT) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
title_sort loss of sensitivity of immunochromatographic test (ict) for lymphatic filariasis diagnosis in low prevalence settings: consequence in the monitoring and evaluation procedures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1317-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gounouekamkumoraceline lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures
AT nanadjeungahuguesc lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures
AT bopdajean lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures
AT akamejulie lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures
AT tariniann lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures
AT kamgnojoseph lossofsensitivityofimmunochromatographictestictforlymphaticfilariasisdiagnosisinlowprevalencesettingsconsequenceinthemonitoringandevaluationprocedures