Cargando…

Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones

BACKGROUND: Behaviour change communication (BCC) can improve malaria prevention and treatment behaviour. As a one of the activities under Myanmar Artemisinin Resistance Containment (MARC) programme, BCC have been conducting. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the behaviour change comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyunt, Myat Htut, Aye, Khin Myo, Kyaw, Myat Phone, Wai, Khin Thet, Oo, Tin, Than, Aye, Oo, Htet Wai, Phway, Hnin Phyu, Han, Soe Soe, Htun, Thurein, San, Kyaw Kyaw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26697850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1047-y
_version_ 1782406990270562304
author Nyunt, Myat Htut
Aye, Khin Myo
Kyaw, Myat Phone
Wai, Khin Thet
Oo, Tin
Than, Aye
Oo, Htet Wai
Phway, Hnin Phyu
Han, Soe Soe
Htun, Thurein
San, Kyaw Kyaw
author_facet Nyunt, Myat Htut
Aye, Khin Myo
Kyaw, Myat Phone
Wai, Khin Thet
Oo, Tin
Than, Aye
Oo, Htet Wai
Phway, Hnin Phyu
Han, Soe Soe
Htun, Thurein
San, Kyaw Kyaw
author_sort Nyunt, Myat Htut
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Behaviour change communication (BCC) can improve malaria prevention and treatment behaviour. As a one of the activities under Myanmar Artemisinin Resistance Containment (MARC) programme, BCC have been conducting. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in MARC zones in Myanmar. METHODS: A cross sectional descriptive survey was conducted in randomly selected 16 townships in Tier I and II areas of MARC zones by quantitative and qualitative approaches. RESULTS: In 832 households resided by 4664 people, there were 3797 bed nets. Around 54 % were untreated while 45.6 % were insecticide-treated nets (ITN) and 36.2 % were long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Proportion of households with at least one ITN was 625 (75.12 %), proportion of households with at least one ITN for every two peoples was 487 (58.53 %), and proportion of existing ITNs used in previous night was 1225 (70.65 %) respectively. Nearly 23 % of households had old nets while 52 % had new and unused extra bed nets reflecting the adequacy. Interestingly, 38 % could not mention the benefit of the use of ITN/LLINs. Although 88.2 % knew the disease “malaria”, 11.9 % could not be able to mention the symptoms. More than 80 % provided correct responses that mosquito bite can cause malaria while only 36.9 % could mention the blood test for malaria diagnosis. Only 36.6 % received malaria information within previous year but nearly 15 % could not recognize it. Mostly, 80 % of fever episodes were treated at rural health centers (38.24 %) followed by drug shops (17.65 %) and private clinics (16.18 %) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should focus on correcting misconceptions about malaria transmission, prevention and universal use of ITN/LLINs. Although BCC activities have been documented, it is still necessary to intensify community mobilization through all accessible multiple channels in MARC areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46903022015-12-25 Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones Nyunt, Myat Htut Aye, Khin Myo Kyaw, Myat Phone Wai, Khin Thet Oo, Tin Than, Aye Oo, Htet Wai Phway, Hnin Phyu Han, Soe Soe Htun, Thurein San, Kyaw Kyaw Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Behaviour change communication (BCC) can improve malaria prevention and treatment behaviour. As a one of the activities under Myanmar Artemisinin Resistance Containment (MARC) programme, BCC have been conducting. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in MARC zones in Myanmar. METHODS: A cross sectional descriptive survey was conducted in randomly selected 16 townships in Tier I and II areas of MARC zones by quantitative and qualitative approaches. RESULTS: In 832 households resided by 4664 people, there were 3797 bed nets. Around 54 % were untreated while 45.6 % were insecticide-treated nets (ITN) and 36.2 % were long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Proportion of households with at least one ITN was 625 (75.12 %), proportion of households with at least one ITN for every two peoples was 487 (58.53 %), and proportion of existing ITNs used in previous night was 1225 (70.65 %) respectively. Nearly 23 % of households had old nets while 52 % had new and unused extra bed nets reflecting the adequacy. Interestingly, 38 % could not mention the benefit of the use of ITN/LLINs. Although 88.2 % knew the disease “malaria”, 11.9 % could not be able to mention the symptoms. More than 80 % provided correct responses that mosquito bite can cause malaria while only 36.9 % could mention the blood test for malaria diagnosis. Only 36.6 % received malaria information within previous year but nearly 15 % could not recognize it. Mostly, 80 % of fever episodes were treated at rural health centers (38.24 %) followed by drug shops (17.65 %) and private clinics (16.18 %) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should focus on correcting misconceptions about malaria transmission, prevention and universal use of ITN/LLINs. Although BCC activities have been documented, it is still necessary to intensify community mobilization through all accessible multiple channels in MARC areas. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4690302/ /pubmed/26697850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1047-y Text en © Nyunt et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nyunt, Myat Htut
Aye, Khin Myo
Kyaw, Myat Phone
Wai, Khin Thet
Oo, Tin
Than, Aye
Oo, Htet Wai
Phway, Hnin Phyu
Han, Soe Soe
Htun, Thurein
San, Kyaw Kyaw
Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title_full Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title_fullStr Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title_short Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
title_sort evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26697850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-1047-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nyuntmyathtut evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT ayekhinmyo evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT kyawmyatphone evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT waikhinthet evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT ootin evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT thanaye evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT oohtetwai evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT phwayhninphyu evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT hansoesoe evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT htunthurein evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones
AT sankyawkyaw evaluationofthebehaviourchangecommunicationandcommunitymobilizationactivitiesinmyanmarartemisininresistancecontainmentzones