Cargando…
The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8 |
_version_ | 1782406999831478272 |
---|---|
author | Lichtner, Valentina Dowding, Dawn Closs, S. José |
author_facet | Lichtner, Valentina Dowding, Dawn Closs, S. José |
author_sort | Lichtner, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim of this study was to understand current pain assessment practices, in order to later inform the development of a decision support tool designed to improve the management of pain for people with dementia in hospital. METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted in four hospitals in the UK (11 wards), with observations of patients with dementia (n = 31), interviews of staff (n = 52) and patients’ family members (n = 4) and documentary analysis. A thematic analysis was carried out, structured along dimensions of decision making. This paper focuses on the emergent themes related to the use of assessment tools and pain intensity scores. RESULTS: A variety of tools were used to record pain intensity, usually with numerical scales. None of the tools in actual use had been specifically designed for patients with cognitive impairment. With patients with more severe dementia, the patient’s body language and other cues were studied to infer pain intensity and then a score entered on behalf of the patient. Information regarding the temporality of pain and changes in pain experience (rather than a score at a single point in time) seemed to be most useful to the assessment of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the inherent uncertainty of the meaning of pain scores for patients with dementia, numerical scales were used with caution. Numerical scores triggered action but their meaning was relative - to the patient, to the clinician, to the time of recording and to the purpose of documenting. There are implications for use of data and computerized decision support systems design. Decision support interventions should include personalized alerting cut-off scores for individual patients, display pain scores over time and integrate professional narratives, mitigating uncertainties around single pain scores for patients with dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4690343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46903432015-12-25 The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia Lichtner, Valentina Dowding, Dawn Closs, S. José BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim of this study was to understand current pain assessment practices, in order to later inform the development of a decision support tool designed to improve the management of pain for people with dementia in hospital. METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted in four hospitals in the UK (11 wards), with observations of patients with dementia (n = 31), interviews of staff (n = 52) and patients’ family members (n = 4) and documentary analysis. A thematic analysis was carried out, structured along dimensions of decision making. This paper focuses on the emergent themes related to the use of assessment tools and pain intensity scores. RESULTS: A variety of tools were used to record pain intensity, usually with numerical scales. None of the tools in actual use had been specifically designed for patients with cognitive impairment. With patients with more severe dementia, the patient’s body language and other cues were studied to infer pain intensity and then a score entered on behalf of the patient. Information regarding the temporality of pain and changes in pain experience (rather than a score at a single point in time) seemed to be most useful to the assessment of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the inherent uncertainty of the meaning of pain scores for patients with dementia, numerical scales were used with caution. Numerical scores triggered action but their meaning was relative - to the patient, to the clinician, to the time of recording and to the purpose of documenting. There are implications for use of data and computerized decision support systems design. Decision support interventions should include personalized alerting cut-off scores for individual patients, display pain scores over time and integrate professional narratives, mitigating uncertainties around single pain scores for patients with dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4690343/ /pubmed/26703244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8 Text en © Lichtner et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lichtner, Valentina Dowding, Dawn Closs, S. José The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title | The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title_full | The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title_fullStr | The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title_short | The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
title_sort | relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichtnervalentina therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia AT dowdingdawn therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia AT closssjose therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia AT lichtnervalentina relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia AT dowdingdawn relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia AT closssjose relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia |