Cargando…

The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia

BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lichtner, Valentina, Dowding, Dawn, Closs, S. José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8
_version_ 1782406999831478272
author Lichtner, Valentina
Dowding, Dawn
Closs, S. José
author_facet Lichtner, Valentina
Dowding, Dawn
Closs, S. José
author_sort Lichtner, Valentina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim of this study was to understand current pain assessment practices, in order to later inform the development of a decision support tool designed to improve the management of pain for people with dementia in hospital. METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted in four hospitals in the UK (11 wards), with observations of patients with dementia (n = 31), interviews of staff (n = 52) and patients’ family members (n = 4) and documentary analysis. A thematic analysis was carried out, structured along dimensions of decision making. This paper focuses on the emergent themes related to the use of assessment tools and pain intensity scores. RESULTS: A variety of tools were used to record pain intensity, usually with numerical scales. None of the tools in actual use had been specifically designed for patients with cognitive impairment. With patients with more severe dementia, the patient’s body language and other cues were studied to infer pain intensity and then a score entered on behalf of the patient. Information regarding the temporality of pain and changes in pain experience (rather than a score at a single point in time) seemed to be most useful to the assessment of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the inherent uncertainty of the meaning of pain scores for patients with dementia, numerical scales were used with caution. Numerical scores triggered action but their meaning was relative - to the patient, to the clinician, to the time of recording and to the purpose of documenting. There are implications for use of data and computerized decision support systems design. Decision support interventions should include personalized alerting cut-off scores for individual patients, display pain scores over time and integrate professional narratives, mitigating uncertainties around single pain scores for patients with dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46903432015-12-25 The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia Lichtner, Valentina Dowding, Dawn Closs, S. José BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of pain in patients with dementia is known to be challenging, due to patients’ cognitive and/or communication difficulties. In the UK, pain in hospital is managed through regular assessments, with the use of pain intensity scores as triggers for action. The aim of this study was to understand current pain assessment practices, in order to later inform the development of a decision support tool designed to improve the management of pain for people with dementia in hospital. METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted in four hospitals in the UK (11 wards), with observations of patients with dementia (n = 31), interviews of staff (n = 52) and patients’ family members (n = 4) and documentary analysis. A thematic analysis was carried out, structured along dimensions of decision making. This paper focuses on the emergent themes related to the use of assessment tools and pain intensity scores. RESULTS: A variety of tools were used to record pain intensity, usually with numerical scales. None of the tools in actual use had been specifically designed for patients with cognitive impairment. With patients with more severe dementia, the patient’s body language and other cues were studied to infer pain intensity and then a score entered on behalf of the patient. Information regarding the temporality of pain and changes in pain experience (rather than a score at a single point in time) seemed to be most useful to the assessment of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the inherent uncertainty of the meaning of pain scores for patients with dementia, numerical scales were used with caution. Numerical scores triggered action but their meaning was relative - to the patient, to the clinician, to the time of recording and to the purpose of documenting. There are implications for use of data and computerized decision support systems design. Decision support interventions should include personalized alerting cut-off scores for individual patients, display pain scores over time and integrate professional narratives, mitigating uncertainties around single pain scores for patients with dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4690343/ /pubmed/26703244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8 Text en © Lichtner et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lichtner, Valentina
Dowding, Dawn
Closs, S. José
The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title_full The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title_fullStr The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title_full_unstemmed The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title_short The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
title_sort relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0233-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lichtnervalentina therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia
AT dowdingdawn therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia
AT closssjose therelativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia
AT lichtnervalentina relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia
AT dowdingdawn relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia
AT closssjose relativemeaningofabsolutenumbersthecaseofpainintensityscoresasdecisionsupportsystemsforpainmanagementofpatientswithdementia