Cargando…

Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep

New tests of animal affect and welfare require validation in subjects experiencing putatively different states. Pharmacological manipulations of affective state are advantageous because they can be administered in a standardised fashion, and the duration of their action can be established and tailor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doyle, Rebecca E., Lee, Caroline, McGill, David M., Mendl, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713255
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1510
_version_ 1782407005395222528
author Doyle, Rebecca E.
Lee, Caroline
McGill, David M.
Mendl, Michael
author_facet Doyle, Rebecca E.
Lee, Caroline
McGill, David M.
Mendl, Michael
author_sort Doyle, Rebecca E.
collection PubMed
description New tests of animal affect and welfare require validation in subjects experiencing putatively different states. Pharmacological manipulations of affective state are advantageous because they can be administered in a standardised fashion, and the duration of their action can be established and tailored to suit the length of a particular test. To this end, the current study aimed to evaluate a pharmacological model of high and low anxiety in an important agricultural and laboratory species, the sheep. Thirty-five 8-month-old female sheep received either an intramuscular injection of the putatively anxiogenic drug 1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP; 1 mg/kg; n = 12), an intravenous injection of the putatively anxiolytic drug diazepam (0.1 mg/kg; n = 12), or acted as a control (saline intramuscular injection n = 11). Thirty minutes after the treatments, sheep were individually exposed to a variety of tests assessing their general movement, performance in a ‘runway task’ (moving down a raceway for a food reward), response to startle, and behaviour in isolation. A test to assess feeding motivation was performed 2 days later following administration of the drugs to the same animals in the same manner. The mCPP sheep had poorer performance in the two runway tasks (6.8 and 7.7 × slower respectively than control group; p < 0.001), a greater startle response (1.4 vs. 0.6; p = 0.02), a higher level of movement during isolation (9.1 steps vs. 5.4; p < 0.001), and a lower feeding motivation (1.8 × slower; p < 0.001) than the control group, all of which act as indicators of anxiety. These results show that mCPP is an effective pharmacological model of high anxiety in sheep. Comparatively, the sheep treated with diazepam did not display any differences compared to the control sheep. Thus we suggest that mCPP is an effective treatment to validate future tests aimed at assessing anxiety in sheep, and that future studies should include other subtle indicators of positive affective states, as well as dosage studies, so conclusions on the efficacy of diazepam as a model of low anxiety can be drawn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46903672015-12-28 Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep Doyle, Rebecca E. Lee, Caroline McGill, David M. Mendl, Michael PeerJ Agricultural Science New tests of animal affect and welfare require validation in subjects experiencing putatively different states. Pharmacological manipulations of affective state are advantageous because they can be administered in a standardised fashion, and the duration of their action can be established and tailored to suit the length of a particular test. To this end, the current study aimed to evaluate a pharmacological model of high and low anxiety in an important agricultural and laboratory species, the sheep. Thirty-five 8-month-old female sheep received either an intramuscular injection of the putatively anxiogenic drug 1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP; 1 mg/kg; n = 12), an intravenous injection of the putatively anxiolytic drug diazepam (0.1 mg/kg; n = 12), or acted as a control (saline intramuscular injection n = 11). Thirty minutes after the treatments, sheep were individually exposed to a variety of tests assessing their general movement, performance in a ‘runway task’ (moving down a raceway for a food reward), response to startle, and behaviour in isolation. A test to assess feeding motivation was performed 2 days later following administration of the drugs to the same animals in the same manner. The mCPP sheep had poorer performance in the two runway tasks (6.8 and 7.7 × slower respectively than control group; p < 0.001), a greater startle response (1.4 vs. 0.6; p = 0.02), a higher level of movement during isolation (9.1 steps vs. 5.4; p < 0.001), and a lower feeding motivation (1.8 × slower; p < 0.001) than the control group, all of which act as indicators of anxiety. These results show that mCPP is an effective pharmacological model of high anxiety in sheep. Comparatively, the sheep treated with diazepam did not display any differences compared to the control sheep. Thus we suggest that mCPP is an effective treatment to validate future tests aimed at assessing anxiety in sheep, and that future studies should include other subtle indicators of positive affective states, as well as dosage studies, so conclusions on the efficacy of diazepam as a model of low anxiety can be drawn. PeerJ Inc. 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4690367/ /pubmed/26713255 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1510 Text en © 2015 Doyle et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Doyle, Rebecca E.
Lee, Caroline
McGill, David M.
Mendl, Michael
Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title_full Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title_fullStr Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title_short Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
title_sort evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713255
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1510
work_keys_str_mv AT doylerebeccae evaluatingpharmacologicalmodelsofhighandlowanxietyinsheep
AT leecaroline evaluatingpharmacologicalmodelsofhighandlowanxietyinsheep
AT mcgilldavidm evaluatingpharmacologicalmodelsofhighandlowanxietyinsheep
AT mendlmichael evaluatingpharmacologicalmodelsofhighandlowanxietyinsheep