Cargando…
Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP
BACKGROUND: The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for numerically small populations. However, accuracies of across population genomic prediction, in which reference and selection individuals are from different populations,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26698836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x |
_version_ | 1782407010847817728 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, S. Calus, M. P. L. Meuwissen, T. H. E. Wientjes, Y. C. J. |
author_facet | van den Berg, S. Calus, M. P. L. Meuwissen, T. H. E. Wientjes, Y. C. J. |
author_sort | van den Berg, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for numerically small populations. However, accuracies of across population genomic prediction, in which reference and selection individuals are from different populations, are currently disappointing. It has been shown for within population genomic prediction that Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP models when the number of QTL underlying the trait is low. Therefore, our objective was to identify across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy. In this study, high density genotype information of 1033 Holstein Friesian, 105 Groningen White Headed, and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were used. Phenotypes were simulated using two changing variables: (1) the number of QTL underlying the trait (3000, 300, 30, 3), and (2) the correlation between allele substitution effects of QTL across populations, i.e. the genetic correlation of the simulated trait between the populations (1.0, 0.8, 0.4). RESULTS: The accuracy obtained by the Bayesian variable selection model was depending on the number of QTL underlying the trait, with a higher accuracy when the number of QTL was lower. This trend was more pronounced for across population genomic prediction than for within population genomic prediction. It was shown that Bayesian variable selection models have an advantage over GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was small. This advantage disappeared when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was large. The point where the accuracy of Bayesian variable selection and GBLUP became similar was approximately the point where the number of QTL was equal to the number of independent chromosome segments (M(e)) across the populations. CONCLUSION: Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the trait is smaller than M(e). Across populations, M(e) is considerably larger than within populations. So, it is more likely to find a number of QTL underlying a trait smaller than M(e) across populations than within population. Therefore Bayesian variable selection models can help to improve the accuracy of across population genomic prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4690391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46903912015-12-25 Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP van den Berg, S. Calus, M. P. L. Meuwissen, T. H. E. Wientjes, Y. C. J. BMC Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for numerically small populations. However, accuracies of across population genomic prediction, in which reference and selection individuals are from different populations, are currently disappointing. It has been shown for within population genomic prediction that Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP models when the number of QTL underlying the trait is low. Therefore, our objective was to identify across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy. In this study, high density genotype information of 1033 Holstein Friesian, 105 Groningen White Headed, and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were used. Phenotypes were simulated using two changing variables: (1) the number of QTL underlying the trait (3000, 300, 30, 3), and (2) the correlation between allele substitution effects of QTL across populations, i.e. the genetic correlation of the simulated trait between the populations (1.0, 0.8, 0.4). RESULTS: The accuracy obtained by the Bayesian variable selection model was depending on the number of QTL underlying the trait, with a higher accuracy when the number of QTL was lower. This trend was more pronounced for across population genomic prediction than for within population genomic prediction. It was shown that Bayesian variable selection models have an advantage over GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was small. This advantage disappeared when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was large. The point where the accuracy of Bayesian variable selection and GBLUP became similar was approximately the point where the number of QTL was equal to the number of independent chromosome segments (M(e)) across the populations. CONCLUSION: Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the trait is smaller than M(e). Across populations, M(e) is considerably larger than within populations. So, it is more likely to find a number of QTL underlying a trait smaller than M(e) across populations than within population. Therefore Bayesian variable selection models can help to improve the accuracy of across population genomic prediction. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4690391/ /pubmed/26698836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x Text en © van den Berg et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van den Berg, S. Calus, M. P. L. Meuwissen, T. H. E. Wientjes, Y. C. J. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title | Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title_full | Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title_fullStr | Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title_full_unstemmed | Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title_short | Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP |
title_sort | across population genomic prediction scenarios in which bayesian variable selection outperforms gblup |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26698836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergs acrosspopulationgenomicpredictionscenariosinwhichbayesianvariableselectionoutperformsgblup AT calusmpl acrosspopulationgenomicpredictionscenariosinwhichbayesianvariableselectionoutperformsgblup AT meuwissenthe acrosspopulationgenomicpredictionscenariosinwhichbayesianvariableselectionoutperformsgblup AT wientjesycj acrosspopulationgenomicpredictionscenariosinwhichbayesianvariableselectionoutperformsgblup |