Cargando…

Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?

The calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of ligh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoenemann, Brigitte, Clarkson, Euan N.K., Horváth, Gábor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713243
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1492
_version_ 1782407011088990208
author Schoenemann, Brigitte
Clarkson, Euan N.K.
Horváth, Gábor
author_facet Schoenemann, Brigitte
Clarkson, Euan N.K.
Horváth, Gábor
author_sort Schoenemann, Brigitte
collection PubMed
description The calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of light. In some respects, however, calcite lenses bear evident disadvantages. Birefringence would cause double images at different depths, but this is not a problem for trilobites since the difference in the paths of the ordinary and extraordinary rays is less than the diameter of the receptor cells. Another point, not discussed hitherto, is that calcite fluoresces when illuminated with UV-A. Here we show experimentally that calcite lenses fluoresce, and we discuss why fluorescence does not diminish the optical quality of these lenses and the image formed by them. In the environments in which the trilobites lived, UV-A would not have been a relevant factor, and thus fluorescence would not have disturbed or confused their visual system. We also argue that whatever the reason that calcite was never again used successfully in the visual systems of aquatic arthropods, it was not fluorescence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46903922015-12-28 Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites? Schoenemann, Brigitte Clarkson, Euan N.K. Horváth, Gábor PeerJ Biophysics The calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of light. In some respects, however, calcite lenses bear evident disadvantages. Birefringence would cause double images at different depths, but this is not a problem for trilobites since the difference in the paths of the ordinary and extraordinary rays is less than the diameter of the receptor cells. Another point, not discussed hitherto, is that calcite fluoresces when illuminated with UV-A. Here we show experimentally that calcite lenses fluoresce, and we discuss why fluorescence does not diminish the optical quality of these lenses and the image formed by them. In the environments in which the trilobites lived, UV-A would not have been a relevant factor, and thus fluorescence would not have disturbed or confused their visual system. We also argue that whatever the reason that calcite was never again used successfully in the visual systems of aquatic arthropods, it was not fluorescence. PeerJ Inc. 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4690392/ /pubmed/26713243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1492 Text en ©2015 Schoenemann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biophysics
Schoenemann, Brigitte
Clarkson, Euan N.K.
Horváth, Gábor
Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_full Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_fullStr Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_full_unstemmed Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_short Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_sort why did the uv-a-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
topic Biophysics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713243
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1492
work_keys_str_mv AT schoenemannbrigitte whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites
AT clarksoneuannk whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites
AT horvathgabor whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites