Cargando…

Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wintner, L. M., Giesinger, J. M., Zabernigg, A., Rumpold, G., Sztankay, M., Oberguggenberger, A. S., Gamper, E. M., Holzner, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y
_version_ 1782407015805485056
author Wintner, L. M.
Giesinger, J. M.
Zabernigg, A.
Rumpold, G.
Sztankay, M.
Oberguggenberger, A. S.
Gamper, E. M.
Holzner, B.
author_facet Wintner, L. M.
Giesinger, J. M.
Zabernigg, A.
Rumpold, G.
Sztankay, M.
Oberguggenberger, A. S.
Gamper, E. M.
Holzner, B.
author_sort Wintner, L. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes. METHODS: At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes). CONCLUSIONS: The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients’ attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4690412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46904122015-12-25 Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home Wintner, L. M. Giesinger, J. M. Zabernigg, A. Rumpold, G. Sztankay, M. Oberguggenberger, A. S. Gamper, E. M. Holzner, B. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes. METHODS: At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes). CONCLUSIONS: The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients’ attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4690412/ /pubmed/26699708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y Text en © Wintner et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wintner, L. M.
Giesinger, J. M.
Zabernigg, A.
Rumpold, G.
Sztankay, M.
Oberguggenberger, A. S.
Gamper, E. M.
Holzner, B.
Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title_full Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title_fullStr Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title_short Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
title_sort evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wintnerlm evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT giesingerjm evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT zabernigga evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT rumpoldg evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT sztankaym evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT oberguggenbergeras evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT gamperem evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome
AT holznerb evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome