Cargando…
Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y |
_version_ | 1782407015805485056 |
---|---|
author | Wintner, L. M. Giesinger, J. M. Zabernigg, A. Rumpold, G. Sztankay, M. Oberguggenberger, A. S. Gamper, E. M. Holzner, B. |
author_facet | Wintner, L. M. Giesinger, J. M. Zabernigg, A. Rumpold, G. Sztankay, M. Oberguggenberger, A. S. Gamper, E. M. Holzner, B. |
author_sort | Wintner, L. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes. METHODS: At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes). CONCLUSIONS: The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients’ attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4690412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46904122015-12-25 Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home Wintner, L. M. Giesinger, J. M. Zabernigg, A. Rumpold, G. Sztankay, M. Oberguggenberger, A. S. Gamper, E. M. Holzner, B. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients’ quality of life than do mere physicians’ ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients’ homes as well. This study reports on patients’ personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes. METHODS: At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes). CONCLUSIONS: The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients’ attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments. BioMed Central 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4690412/ /pubmed/26699708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y Text en © Wintner et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wintner, L. M. Giesinger, J. M. Zabernigg, A. Rumpold, G. Sztankay, M. Oberguggenberger, A. S. Gamper, E. M. Holzner, B. Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title_full | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title_short | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
title_sort | evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintnerlm evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT giesingerjm evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT zabernigga evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT rumpoldg evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT sztankaym evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT oberguggenbergeras evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT gamperem evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome AT holznerb evaluationofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeassessmentwithcancerpatientsinthehospitalandathome |