Cargando…
Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†)
PURPOSE: Signal detection methods have been used extensively in postmarket surveillance to identify elevated risks of adverse events associated with medical products (drugs, vaccines, and devices). However, current popular disproportionality methods ignore useful information such as trends when the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3783 |
_version_ | 1782407023642542080 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Zhiheng Kass-Hout, Taha Anderson-Smits, Colin Gray, Gerry |
author_facet | Xu, Zhiheng Kass-Hout, Taha Anderson-Smits, Colin Gray, Gerry |
author_sort | Xu, Zhiheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Signal detection methods have been used extensively in postmarket surveillance to identify elevated risks of adverse events associated with medical products (drugs, vaccines, and devices). However, current popular disproportionality methods ignore useful information such as trends when the data are aggregated over time for signal detection. METHODS: In this paper, we applied change point analysis (CPA) to trend analysis of medical products in a spontaneous adverse event reporting system. CPA was used to detect the time point at which statistical properties of a sequence of observations change over time. Two CPA approaches, change in mean and change in variance, were demonstrated by an example using neurostimulator adverse event dataset. RESULTS: Two significant change points associated with upward trends were detected in June 2008 (n = 20, p < 0.001) and May 2011 (n = 51, p = 0.003). Further investigation confirmed battery issues and expansion of the indication for use could be possible causes for the occurrence of these change points. Two time points showed extremely low number of loss of therapy events, two cases in October 2009 and three in November 2009, which could be the result of reporting issues such as underreporting. CONCLUSION: As a complimentary tool to current signal detection efforts at FDA, CPA can be used to detect changes in the association between medical products and adverse events over time. Detecting these changes could be critical for public health regulation, adverse events surveillance, product recalls, and regulators’ understanding of the connection between adverse events and other events regarding regulated products. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4690504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46905042015-12-31 Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) Xu, Zhiheng Kass-Hout, Taha Anderson-Smits, Colin Gray, Gerry Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Reports PURPOSE: Signal detection methods have been used extensively in postmarket surveillance to identify elevated risks of adverse events associated with medical products (drugs, vaccines, and devices). However, current popular disproportionality methods ignore useful information such as trends when the data are aggregated over time for signal detection. METHODS: In this paper, we applied change point analysis (CPA) to trend analysis of medical products in a spontaneous adverse event reporting system. CPA was used to detect the time point at which statistical properties of a sequence of observations change over time. Two CPA approaches, change in mean and change in variance, were demonstrated by an example using neurostimulator adverse event dataset. RESULTS: Two significant change points associated with upward trends were detected in June 2008 (n = 20, p < 0.001) and May 2011 (n = 51, p = 0.003). Further investigation confirmed battery issues and expansion of the indication for use could be possible causes for the occurrence of these change points. Two time points showed extremely low number of loss of therapy events, two cases in October 2009 and three in November 2009, which could be the result of reporting issues such as underreporting. CONCLUSION: As a complimentary tool to current signal detection efforts at FDA, CPA can be used to detect changes in the association between medical products and adverse events over time. Detecting these changes could be critical for public health regulation, adverse events surveillance, product recalls, and regulators’ understanding of the connection between adverse events and other events regarding regulated products. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-06 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4690504/ /pubmed/25903221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3783 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Xu, Zhiheng Kass-Hout, Taha Anderson-Smits, Colin Gray, Gerry Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title | Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title_full | Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title_fullStr | Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title_full_unstemmed | Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title_short | Signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
title_sort | signal detection using change point analysis in postmarket surveillance(†) |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4690504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuzhiheng signaldetectionusingchangepointanalysisinpostmarketsurveillance AT kasshouttaha signaldetectionusingchangepointanalysisinpostmarketsurveillance AT andersonsmitscolin signaldetectionusingchangepointanalysisinpostmarketsurveillance AT graygerry signaldetectionusingchangepointanalysisinpostmarketsurveillance |