Cargando…
Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs ther...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794 |
_version_ | 1782407154313986048 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Bei Duan, Chong-Yang Luo, Cheng-Feng Ou, Cai-Wen Wu, Zhi-Ye Zhang, Jian-Wu Ni, Xiao-Bin Chen, Ping-Yan Chen, Min-Sheng |
author_facet | Liu, Bei Duan, Chong-Yang Luo, Cheng-Feng Ou, Cai-Wen Wu, Zhi-Ye Zhang, Jian-Wu Ni, Xiao-Bin Chen, Ping-Yan Chen, Min-Sheng |
author_sort | Liu, Bei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs therapy. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trials in patients with AMI receiving BMCs therapy were identified from PubMed, Ovid LWW, BIOSIS Previews, and the Cochrane Library through January 2015. 2 035 patients of 31 studies included in our analysis were allocated to 5 groups' treatments: 1~3 days, 4~7 days, 8~14 days, 15~30 days, or placebo/control group. The multiple-treatment meta-analysis showed that 4~7 days' group could lead to significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared with control (mean of MDs and 95% CI: 6 months, 3.05 (0.92~5.25); 12 months, 4.18 (2.30~5.84)). Only 4~7 days led to significant reduction of MACEs compared with control (OR and 95% CI 0.34 (0.13~0.96)) for 12-months follow-up. In simulated comparisons, the 4~7 days' group ranked better than other timing groups for improvement of LVEF or reduction of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions. 4~7 days after AMI might be the optimal timing for cell therapy in terms of efficacy or safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4691493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46914932016-01-18 Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis Liu, Bei Duan, Chong-Yang Luo, Cheng-Feng Ou, Cai-Wen Wu, Zhi-Ye Zhang, Jian-Wu Ni, Xiao-Bin Chen, Ping-Yan Chen, Min-Sheng Stem Cells Int Review Article Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs therapy. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trials in patients with AMI receiving BMCs therapy were identified from PubMed, Ovid LWW, BIOSIS Previews, and the Cochrane Library through January 2015. 2 035 patients of 31 studies included in our analysis were allocated to 5 groups' treatments: 1~3 days, 4~7 days, 8~14 days, 15~30 days, or placebo/control group. The multiple-treatment meta-analysis showed that 4~7 days' group could lead to significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared with control (mean of MDs and 95% CI: 6 months, 3.05 (0.92~5.25); 12 months, 4.18 (2.30~5.84)). Only 4~7 days led to significant reduction of MACEs compared with control (OR and 95% CI 0.34 (0.13~0.96)) for 12-months follow-up. In simulated comparisons, the 4~7 days' group ranked better than other timing groups for improvement of LVEF or reduction of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions. 4~7 days after AMI might be the optimal timing for cell therapy in terms of efficacy or safety. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2015-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4691493/ /pubmed/26783397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794 Text en Copyright © 2016 Bei Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Liu, Bei Duan, Chong-Yang Luo, Cheng-Feng Ou, Cai-Wen Wu, Zhi-Ye Zhang, Jian-Wu Ni, Xiao-Bin Chen, Ping-Yan Chen, Min-Sheng Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | impact of timing following acute myocardial infarction on efficacy and safety of bone marrow stem cells therapy: a network meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liubei impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT duanchongyang impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT luochengfeng impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT oucaiwen impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT wuzhiye impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangjianwu impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT nixiaobin impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT chenpingyan impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT chenminsheng impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis |