Cargando…

Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Bei, Duan, Chong-Yang, Luo, Cheng-Feng, Ou, Cai-Wen, Wu, Zhi-Ye, Zhang, Jian-Wu, Ni, Xiao-Bin, Chen, Ping-Yan, Chen, Min-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794
_version_ 1782407154313986048
author Liu, Bei
Duan, Chong-Yang
Luo, Cheng-Feng
Ou, Cai-Wen
Wu, Zhi-Ye
Zhang, Jian-Wu
Ni, Xiao-Bin
Chen, Ping-Yan
Chen, Min-Sheng
author_facet Liu, Bei
Duan, Chong-Yang
Luo, Cheng-Feng
Ou, Cai-Wen
Wu, Zhi-Ye
Zhang, Jian-Wu
Ni, Xiao-Bin
Chen, Ping-Yan
Chen, Min-Sheng
author_sort Liu, Bei
collection PubMed
description Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs therapy. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trials in patients with AMI receiving BMCs therapy were identified from PubMed, Ovid LWW, BIOSIS Previews, and the Cochrane Library through January 2015. 2 035 patients of 31 studies included in our analysis were allocated to 5 groups' treatments: 1~3 days, 4~7 days, 8~14 days, 15~30 days, or placebo/control group. The multiple-treatment meta-analysis showed that 4~7 days' group could lead to significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared with control (mean of MDs and 95% CI: 6 months, 3.05 (0.92~5.25); 12 months, 4.18 (2.30~5.84)). Only 4~7 days led to significant reduction of MACEs compared with control (OR and 95% CI 0.34 (0.13~0.96)) for 12-months follow-up. In simulated comparisons, the 4~7 days' group ranked better than other timing groups for improvement of LVEF or reduction of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions. 4~7 days after AMI might be the optimal timing for cell therapy in terms of efficacy or safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4691493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46914932016-01-18 Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis Liu, Bei Duan, Chong-Yang Luo, Cheng-Feng Ou, Cai-Wen Wu, Zhi-Ye Zhang, Jian-Wu Ni, Xiao-Bin Chen, Ping-Yan Chen, Min-Sheng Stem Cells Int Review Article Background. The optimal timing for Bone Marrow Stem Cells (BMCs) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Aims. To synthesize the evidence from trials using a multiple-treatment comparison method, thereby permitting a broader comparison across multiple timing of BMCs therapy. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trials in patients with AMI receiving BMCs therapy were identified from PubMed, Ovid LWW, BIOSIS Previews, and the Cochrane Library through January 2015. 2 035 patients of 31 studies included in our analysis were allocated to 5 groups' treatments: 1~3 days, 4~7 days, 8~14 days, 15~30 days, or placebo/control group. The multiple-treatment meta-analysis showed that 4~7 days' group could lead to significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as compared with control (mean of MDs and 95% CI: 6 months, 3.05 (0.92~5.25); 12 months, 4.18 (2.30~5.84)). Only 4~7 days led to significant reduction of MACEs compared with control (OR and 95% CI 0.34 (0.13~0.96)) for 12-months follow-up. In simulated comparisons, the 4~7 days' group ranked better than other timing groups for improvement of LVEF or reduction of the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions. 4~7 days after AMI might be the optimal timing for cell therapy in terms of efficacy or safety. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2015-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4691493/ /pubmed/26783397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794 Text en Copyright © 2016 Bei Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Bei
Duan, Chong-Yang
Luo, Cheng-Feng
Ou, Cai-Wen
Wu, Zhi-Ye
Zhang, Jian-Wu
Ni, Xiao-Bin
Chen, Ping-Yan
Chen, Min-Sheng
Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Impact of Timing following Acute Myocardial Infarction on Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort impact of timing following acute myocardial infarction on efficacy and safety of bone marrow stem cells therapy: a network meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1031794
work_keys_str_mv AT liubei impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT duanchongyang impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT luochengfeng impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT oucaiwen impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wuzhiye impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangjianwu impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT nixiaobin impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenpingyan impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenminsheng impactoftimingfollowingacutemyocardialinfarctiononefficacyandsafetyofbonemarrowstemcellstherapyanetworkmetaanalysis