Cargando…

Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions delivered in humanitarian crises. SETTING: Crisis affected low-income or middle-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: Crisis-affected populations in low-income or middle-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Emily, Post, Nathan, Hossain, Mazeda, Blanchet, Karl, Roberts, Bayard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26685020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226
_version_ 1782407183053357056
author Warren, Emily
Post, Nathan
Hossain, Mazeda
Blanchet, Karl
Roberts, Bayard
author_facet Warren, Emily
Post, Nathan
Hossain, Mazeda
Blanchet, Karl
Roberts, Bayard
author_sort Warren, Emily
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions delivered in humanitarian crises. SETTING: Crisis affected low-income or middle-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: Crisis-affected populations in low-income or middle-income countries. METHOD: Peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were systematically searched for relevant papers detailing interventions from 1 January 1980 until the search date on 30 April 2013. Data from included studies were then extracted, and the papers’ quality evaluated using criteria based on modified STROBE and CONSORT checklists. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes include, but are not limited to, changes in morbidity, mortality, sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis or gender-based violence. Secondary outcomes include, but are not limited to, reported condom use or skilled attendance at birth. Primary outputs include, but are not limited to, condoms distributed or education courses taught. RESULTS: Of 7149 returned citations, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one randomised controlled trial was identified. The remaining observational studies were of moderate quality, demonstrating limited use of controls and inadequate attempts to address bias. Evidence of effectiveness was available for the following interventions: impregnated bed nets for pregnant women, subsidised refugee healthcare, female community health workers, and tiered community reproductive health services. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base for SRH interventions highlights the need for improved research on the effectiveness of public health interventions in humanitarian crises. While interventions proven efficacious in stable settings are being used in humanitarian efforts, more evidence is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of delivering and scaling-up such interventions in humanitarian crises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4691726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46917262015-12-30 Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises Warren, Emily Post, Nathan Hossain, Mazeda Blanchet, Karl Roberts, Bayard BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions delivered in humanitarian crises. SETTING: Crisis affected low-income or middle-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: Crisis-affected populations in low-income or middle-income countries. METHOD: Peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were systematically searched for relevant papers detailing interventions from 1 January 1980 until the search date on 30 April 2013. Data from included studies were then extracted, and the papers’ quality evaluated using criteria based on modified STROBE and CONSORT checklists. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes include, but are not limited to, changes in morbidity, mortality, sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis or gender-based violence. Secondary outcomes include, but are not limited to, reported condom use or skilled attendance at birth. Primary outputs include, but are not limited to, condoms distributed or education courses taught. RESULTS: Of 7149 returned citations, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one randomised controlled trial was identified. The remaining observational studies were of moderate quality, demonstrating limited use of controls and inadequate attempts to address bias. Evidence of effectiveness was available for the following interventions: impregnated bed nets for pregnant women, subsidised refugee healthcare, female community health workers, and tiered community reproductive health services. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base for SRH interventions highlights the need for improved research on the effectiveness of public health interventions in humanitarian crises. While interventions proven efficacious in stable settings are being used in humanitarian efforts, more evidence is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of delivering and scaling-up such interventions in humanitarian crises. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4691726/ /pubmed/26685020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Sexual Health
Warren, Emily
Post, Nathan
Hossain, Mazeda
Blanchet, Karl
Roberts, Bayard
Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title_full Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title_fullStr Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title_short Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
title_sort systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises
topic Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26685020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226
work_keys_str_mv AT warrenemily systematicreviewoftheevidenceontheeffectivenessofsexualandreproductivehealthinterventionsinhumanitariancrises
AT postnathan systematicreviewoftheevidenceontheeffectivenessofsexualandreproductivehealthinterventionsinhumanitariancrises
AT hossainmazeda systematicreviewoftheevidenceontheeffectivenessofsexualandreproductivehealthinterventionsinhumanitariancrises
AT blanchetkarl systematicreviewoftheevidenceontheeffectivenessofsexualandreproductivehealthinterventionsinhumanitariancrises
AT robertsbayard systematicreviewoftheevidenceontheeffectivenessofsexualandreproductivehealthinterventionsinhumanitariancrises