Cargando…

Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about service utilisation by patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in UK primary care. We examined their consultation rate patterns and whether they were impacted by the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), in 2004. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Olier, Ivan, Planner, Claire, Reeves, David, Ashcroft, Darren M, Gask, Linda, Doran, Tim, Reilly, Siobhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26674496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008650
_version_ 1782407192204279808
author Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Olier, Ivan
Planner, Claire
Reeves, David
Ashcroft, Darren M
Gask, Linda
Doran, Tim
Reilly, Siobhan
author_facet Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Olier, Ivan
Planner, Claire
Reeves, David
Ashcroft, Darren M
Gask, Linda
Doran, Tim
Reilly, Siobhan
author_sort Kontopantelis, Evangelos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Little is known about service utilisation by patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in UK primary care. We examined their consultation rate patterns and whether they were impacted by the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), in 2004. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using individual patient data collected from 2000 to 2012. SETTING: 627 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK primary care database. PARTICIPANTS: SMI cases (346 551) matched to 5 individuals without SMI (1 732 755) on age, gender and general practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation rates were calculated for both groups, across 3 types: face-to-face (primary outcome), telephone and other (not only consultations but including administrative tasks). Poisson regression analyses were used to identify predictors of consultation rates and calculate adjusted consultation rates. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to quantify the effect of the QOF. RESULTS: Over the study period, face-to-face consultations in primary care remained relatively stable in the matched control group (between 4.5 and 4.9 per annum) but increased for people with SMI (8.8–10.9). Women and older patients consulted more frequently in the SMI and the matched control groups, across all 3 consultation types. Following the introduction of the QOF, there was an increase in the annual trend of face-to-face consultation for people with SMI (average increase of 0.19 consultations per patient per year, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.36), which was not observed for the control group (estimates across groups statistically different, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the QOF was associated with increases in the frequency of monitoring and in the average number of reported comorbidities for patients with SMI. This suggests that the QOF scheme successfully incentivised practices to improve their monitoring of the mental and physical health of this group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4691766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46917662015-12-30 Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Kontopantelis, Evangelos Olier, Ivan Planner, Claire Reeves, David Ashcroft, Darren M Gask, Linda Doran, Tim Reilly, Siobhan BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Little is known about service utilisation by patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in UK primary care. We examined their consultation rate patterns and whether they were impacted by the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), in 2004. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using individual patient data collected from 2000 to 2012. SETTING: 627 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK primary care database. PARTICIPANTS: SMI cases (346 551) matched to 5 individuals without SMI (1 732 755) on age, gender and general practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation rates were calculated for both groups, across 3 types: face-to-face (primary outcome), telephone and other (not only consultations but including administrative tasks). Poisson regression analyses were used to identify predictors of consultation rates and calculate adjusted consultation rates. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to quantify the effect of the QOF. RESULTS: Over the study period, face-to-face consultations in primary care remained relatively stable in the matched control group (between 4.5 and 4.9 per annum) but increased for people with SMI (8.8–10.9). Women and older patients consulted more frequently in the SMI and the matched control groups, across all 3 consultation types. Following the introduction of the QOF, there was an increase in the annual trend of face-to-face consultation for people with SMI (average increase of 0.19 consultations per patient per year, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.36), which was not observed for the control group (estimates across groups statistically different, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the QOF was associated with increases in the frequency of monitoring and in the average number of reported comorbidities for patients with SMI. This suggests that the QOF scheme successfully incentivised practices to improve their monitoring of the mental and physical health of this group of patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4691766/ /pubmed/26674496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008650 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Olier, Ivan
Planner, Claire
Reeves, David
Ashcroft, Darren M
Gask, Linda
Doran, Tim
Reilly, Siobhan
Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_fullStr Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full_unstemmed Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_short Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_sort primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a uk cohort study using the clinical practice research datalink
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26674496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008650
work_keys_str_mv AT kontopantelisevangelos primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT olierivan primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT plannerclaire primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT reevesdavid primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT ashcroftdarrenm primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT gasklinda primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT dorantim primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT reillysiobhan primarycareconsultationratesamongpeoplewithandwithoutseverementalillnessaukcohortstudyusingtheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink