Cargando…
Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy of collaborative care (CC) for depression in adults with coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009128 |
_version_ | 1782407193624051712 |
---|---|
author | Tully, Phillip J Baumeister, Harald |
author_facet | Tully, Phillip J Baumeister, Harald |
author_sort | Tully, Phillip J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy of collaborative care (CC) for depression in adults with coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched until April 2014. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Population, depression comorbid with CHD; intervention, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CC; comparison, either usual care, wait-list control group or no further treatment; and outcome, (primary) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), (secondary) standardised measure of depression, anxiety, quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: RevMan V.5.3 was used to synthesise the data as risk ratios (RRs), ORs and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs in random effect models. RESULTS: Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria and comprised 655 participants randomised to CC and 629 participants randomised to the control group (total 1284). Collaborative depression care led to a significant reduction in MACE in the short term (three trials, RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, p=0.03) that was not sustained in the longer term. Small reductions in depressive symptoms were evident in the short term (6 trials, pooled SMD −0.31; 95% CI −0.43 to −0.19, p<0.00001) and depression remission was more likely to be achieved with CC (5 trials, OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.44, p=0.0005). Likewise, a significant effect was observed for anxiety symptoms (SMD −0.36) and mental QOL (SMD 0.24). The timing of the intervention was a source of between-group heterogeneity for depression symptoms (between groups p=0.04, I(2)=76.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative depression care did not lead to a sustained reduction in the primary MACE end point. Small effects were observed for depression, depression remission, anxiety and mental QOL. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014013653. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4691772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46917722015-12-30 Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Tully, Phillip J Baumeister, Harald BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy of collaborative care (CC) for depression in adults with coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched until April 2014. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Population, depression comorbid with CHD; intervention, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CC; comparison, either usual care, wait-list control group or no further treatment; and outcome, (primary) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), (secondary) standardised measure of depression, anxiety, quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: RevMan V.5.3 was used to synthesise the data as risk ratios (RRs), ORs and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs in random effect models. RESULTS: Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria and comprised 655 participants randomised to CC and 629 participants randomised to the control group (total 1284). Collaborative depression care led to a significant reduction in MACE in the short term (three trials, RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, p=0.03) that was not sustained in the longer term. Small reductions in depressive symptoms were evident in the short term (6 trials, pooled SMD −0.31; 95% CI −0.43 to −0.19, p<0.00001) and depression remission was more likely to be achieved with CC (5 trials, OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.44, p=0.0005). Likewise, a significant effect was observed for anxiety symptoms (SMD −0.36) and mental QOL (SMD 0.24). The timing of the intervention was a source of between-group heterogeneity for depression symptoms (between groups p=0.04, I(2)=76.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative depression care did not lead to a sustained reduction in the primary MACE end point. Small effects were observed for depression, depression remission, anxiety and mental QOL. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014013653. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4691772/ /pubmed/26692557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009128 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Tully, Phillip J Baumeister, Harald Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tullyphillipj collaborativecareforcomorbiddepressionandcoronaryheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT baumeisterharald collaborativecareforcomorbiddepressionandcoronaryheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |