Cargando…
Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients un...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401 |
_version_ | 1782407210898292736 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Neeta Toshyan, Varnit Kumar, Sunesh Vanamail, Perumal Madhu, Malti |
author_facet | Singh, Neeta Toshyan, Varnit Kumar, Sunesh Vanamail, Perumal Madhu, Malti |
author_sort | Singh, Neeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. METHODS: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student's’t’ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4691974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46919742016-01-08 Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center Singh, Neeta Toshyan, Varnit Kumar, Sunesh Vanamail, Perumal Madhu, Malti J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. METHODS: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student's’t’ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4691974/ /pubmed/26752857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Neeta Toshyan, Varnit Kumar, Sunesh Vanamail, Perumal Madhu, Malti Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title | Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title_full | Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title_fullStr | Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title_full_unstemmed | Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title_short | Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
title_sort | does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? a prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhneeta doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter AT toshyanvarnit doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter AT kumarsunesh doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter AT vanamailperumal doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter AT madhumalti doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter |