Cargando…

Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center

BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Neeta, Toshyan, Varnit, Kumar, Sunesh, Vanamail, Perumal, Madhu, Malti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752857
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401
_version_ 1782407210898292736
author Singh, Neeta
Toshyan, Varnit
Kumar, Sunesh
Vanamail, Perumal
Madhu, Malti
author_facet Singh, Neeta
Toshyan, Varnit
Kumar, Sunesh
Vanamail, Perumal
Madhu, Malti
author_sort Singh, Neeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. METHODS: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student's’t’ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4691974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46919742016-01-08 Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center Singh, Neeta Toshyan, Varnit Kumar, Sunesh Vanamail, Perumal Madhu, Malti J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Though Assisted Reproductive Techniques have overcome many fertility disorders, implantation is still considered, the rate-limiting step for the success of IVF. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endometrial scratching in improving the implantation rate in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. METHODS: Sixty infertile women with a history of >1 previous failed IVF-ET cycles were randomizedinto two groups of 30 each. The patients in group 1 underwent endometrial scratching once between days 14-21 of menstrual cycle in the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET), while in group 2scratching were not done. Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate were comparedbetween both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean values were compared between two groups using Student's’t’ independent test. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were compared using Chi-Square/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Implantation rate in group 1 was 19.4% whereas in group 2 it was 8.1%. Difference between two groups was statistically significant (P =0.028). The live birth rate was higher in the group 2 compared to group 1, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.3% vs 10%, P =0.612). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the ongoing pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 0.0%; P =0.052), abortion rate (10.0% vs 3.3%, P =0.612) and miscarriage rate (6.7% vs 3.3%, P =0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation rate increases significantly after endometrial scratching in patients with previous failed IVF-ET. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4691974/ /pubmed/26752857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Neeta
Toshyan, Varnit
Kumar, Sunesh
Vanamail, Perumal
Madhu, Malti
Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_full Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_fullStr Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_short Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
title_sort does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? a prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752857
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170401
work_keys_str_mv AT singhneeta doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT toshyanvarnit doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT kumarsunesh doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT vanamailperumal doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter
AT madhumalti doesendometrialinjuryenhancesimplantationinrecurrentinvitrofertilizationfailuresaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudyfromtertiarycarecenter