Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease

AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg, Adamson, Philip, Gray, Calum, Spratt, James C, Behan, Miles W, Henriksen, Peter, Newby, David E, Mills, Nicholas, Uren, Neal G, Cruden, Nicholas L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225
_version_ 1782407227660828672
author Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg
Adamson, Philip
Gray, Calum
Spratt, James C
Behan, Miles W
Henriksen, Peter
Newby, David E
Mills, Nicholas
Uren, Neal G
Cruden, Nicholas L
author_facet Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg
Adamson, Philip
Gray, Calum
Spratt, James C
Behan, Miles W
Henriksen, Peter
Newby, David E
Mills, Nicholas
Uren, Neal G
Cruden, Nicholas L
author_sort Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging technique with greater spatial resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) but its role in the presence of extensive coronary calcification remains unclear. We sought to determine the utility of FD-OCT compared to IVUS imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease. METHODS: 18 matched IVUS and FD-OCT examinations were evaluated following coronary stent implantation in 12 patients (10 male; mean age 70±7 years) undergoing rotational atherectomy for symptomatic calcific coronary artery disease. RESULTS: In-stent luminal areas were smaller (minimum in-stent area 6.77±2.18 vs 7.19±2.62 mm(2), p<0.05), while reference lumen dimensions were similar with FD-OCT compared with IVUS. Stent malapposition was detected in all patients by FD-OCT and in 10 patients by IVUS. The extent of stent malapposition detected was greater (20% vs 6%, p<0.001) with FD-OCT compared to IVUS. Postdilation increased the in-stent luminal area (minimum in-stent area: 8.15±1.90 vs 7.30±1.62 mm(2), p<0.05) and reduced the extent of stent malapposition (19% vs 34%, p<0.005) when assessed by FD-OCT, but not IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stent malapposition occurs frequently in patients with calcific coronary disease undergoing rotational atherectomy and stent implantation. In the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification, FD-OCT affords enhanced stent visualisation and detection of malapposition, facilitating improved postdilation stent apposition and minimal luminal areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02065102.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4692048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46920482015-12-30 Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg Adamson, Philip Gray, Calum Spratt, James C Behan, Miles W Henriksen, Peter Newby, David E Mills, Nicholas Uren, Neal G Cruden, Nicholas L Open Heart Interventional Cardiology AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging technique with greater spatial resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) but its role in the presence of extensive coronary calcification remains unclear. We sought to determine the utility of FD-OCT compared to IVUS imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease. METHODS: 18 matched IVUS and FD-OCT examinations were evaluated following coronary stent implantation in 12 patients (10 male; mean age 70±7 years) undergoing rotational atherectomy for symptomatic calcific coronary artery disease. RESULTS: In-stent luminal areas were smaller (minimum in-stent area 6.77±2.18 vs 7.19±2.62 mm(2), p<0.05), while reference lumen dimensions were similar with FD-OCT compared with IVUS. Stent malapposition was detected in all patients by FD-OCT and in 10 patients by IVUS. The extent of stent malapposition detected was greater (20% vs 6%, p<0.001) with FD-OCT compared to IVUS. Postdilation increased the in-stent luminal area (minimum in-stent area: 8.15±1.90 vs 7.30±1.62 mm(2), p<0.05) and reduced the extent of stent malapposition (19% vs 34%, p<0.005) when assessed by FD-OCT, but not IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stent malapposition occurs frequently in patients with calcific coronary disease undergoing rotational atherectomy and stent implantation. In the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification, FD-OCT affords enhanced stent visualisation and detection of malapposition, facilitating improved postdilation stent apposition and minimal luminal areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02065102. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4692048/ /pubmed/26719807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg
Adamson, Philip
Gray, Calum
Spratt, James C
Behan, Miles W
Henriksen, Peter
Newby, David E
Mills, Nicholas
Uren, Neal G
Cruden, Nicholas L
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title_full Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title_fullStr Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title_full_unstemmed Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title_short Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
title_sort optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225
work_keys_str_mv AT gudmundsdottiringibjorg opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT adamsonphilip opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT graycalum opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT sprattjamesc opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT behanmilesw opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT henriksenpeter opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT newbydavide opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT millsnicholas opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT urennealg opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease
AT crudennicholasl opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease