Cargando…
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease
AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225 |
_version_ | 1782407227660828672 |
---|---|
author | Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg Adamson, Philip Gray, Calum Spratt, James C Behan, Miles W Henriksen, Peter Newby, David E Mills, Nicholas Uren, Neal G Cruden, Nicholas L |
author_facet | Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg Adamson, Philip Gray, Calum Spratt, James C Behan, Miles W Henriksen, Peter Newby, David E Mills, Nicholas Uren, Neal G Cruden, Nicholas L |
author_sort | Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging technique with greater spatial resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) but its role in the presence of extensive coronary calcification remains unclear. We sought to determine the utility of FD-OCT compared to IVUS imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease. METHODS: 18 matched IVUS and FD-OCT examinations were evaluated following coronary stent implantation in 12 patients (10 male; mean age 70±7 years) undergoing rotational atherectomy for symptomatic calcific coronary artery disease. RESULTS: In-stent luminal areas were smaller (minimum in-stent area 6.77±2.18 vs 7.19±2.62 mm(2), p<0.05), while reference lumen dimensions were similar with FD-OCT compared with IVUS. Stent malapposition was detected in all patients by FD-OCT and in 10 patients by IVUS. The extent of stent malapposition detected was greater (20% vs 6%, p<0.001) with FD-OCT compared to IVUS. Postdilation increased the in-stent luminal area (minimum in-stent area: 8.15±1.90 vs 7.30±1.62 mm(2), p<0.05) and reduced the extent of stent malapposition (19% vs 34%, p<0.005) when assessed by FD-OCT, but not IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stent malapposition occurs frequently in patients with calcific coronary disease undergoing rotational atherectomy and stent implantation. In the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification, FD-OCT affords enhanced stent visualisation and detection of malapposition, facilitating improved postdilation stent apposition and minimal luminal areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02065102. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4692048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46920482015-12-30 Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg Adamson, Philip Gray, Calum Spratt, James C Behan, Miles W Henriksen, Peter Newby, David E Mills, Nicholas Uren, Neal G Cruden, Nicholas L Open Heart Interventional Cardiology AIMS: Stent underexpansion and malapposition are associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, but detection and treatment can be challenging in the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging technique with greater spatial resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) but its role in the presence of extensive coronary calcification remains unclear. We sought to determine the utility of FD-OCT compared to IVUS imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease. METHODS: 18 matched IVUS and FD-OCT examinations were evaluated following coronary stent implantation in 12 patients (10 male; mean age 70±7 years) undergoing rotational atherectomy for symptomatic calcific coronary artery disease. RESULTS: In-stent luminal areas were smaller (minimum in-stent area 6.77±2.18 vs 7.19±2.62 mm(2), p<0.05), while reference lumen dimensions were similar with FD-OCT compared with IVUS. Stent malapposition was detected in all patients by FD-OCT and in 10 patients by IVUS. The extent of stent malapposition detected was greater (20% vs 6%, p<0.001) with FD-OCT compared to IVUS. Postdilation increased the in-stent luminal area (minimum in-stent area: 8.15±1.90 vs 7.30±1.62 mm(2), p<0.05) and reduced the extent of stent malapposition (19% vs 34%, p<0.005) when assessed by FD-OCT, but not IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stent malapposition occurs frequently in patients with calcific coronary disease undergoing rotational atherectomy and stent implantation. In the presence of extensive coronary artery calcification, FD-OCT affords enhanced stent visualisation and detection of malapposition, facilitating improved postdilation stent apposition and minimal luminal areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02065102. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4692048/ /pubmed/26719807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjorg Adamson, Philip Gray, Calum Spratt, James C Behan, Miles W Henriksen, Peter Newby, David E Mills, Nicholas Uren, Neal G Cruden, Nicholas L Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title | Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title_full | Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title_fullStr | Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title_short | Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
title_sort | optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gudmundsdottiringibjorg opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT adamsonphilip opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT graycalum opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT sprattjamesc opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT behanmilesw opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT henriksenpeter opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT newbydavide opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT millsnicholas opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT urennealg opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease AT crudennicholasl opticalcoherencetomographyversusintravascularultrasoundtoevaluatestentimplantationinpatientswithcalcificcoronaryarterydisease |