Cargando…

Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating

Seizure activity in EEG recordings can persist for hours with seizure dynamics changing rapidly over time and space. To characterise the spatiotemporal evolution of seizure activity, large data sets often need to be analysed. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) can be used to estimate the synaptic driver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooray, Gerald K., Sengupta, Biswa, Douglas, Pamela K., Friston, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.063
_version_ 1782407259916075008
author Cooray, Gerald K.
Sengupta, Biswa
Douglas, Pamela K.
Friston, Karl
author_facet Cooray, Gerald K.
Sengupta, Biswa
Douglas, Pamela K.
Friston, Karl
author_sort Cooray, Gerald K.
collection PubMed
description Seizure activity in EEG recordings can persist for hours with seizure dynamics changing rapidly over time and space. To characterise the spatiotemporal evolution of seizure activity, large data sets often need to be analysed. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) can be used to estimate the synaptic drivers of cortical dynamics during a seizure; however, the requisite (Bayesian) inversion procedure is computationally expensive. In this note, we describe a straightforward procedure, within the DCM framework, that provides efficient inversion of seizure activity measured with non-invasive and invasive physiological recordings; namely, EEG/ECoG. We describe the theoretical background behind a Bayesian belief updating scheme for DCM. The scheme is tested on simulated and empirical seizure activity (recorded both invasively and non-invasively) and compared with standard Bayesian inversion. We show that the Bayesian belief updating scheme provides similar estimates of time-varying synaptic parameters, compared to standard schemes, indicating no significant qualitative change in accuracy. The difference in variance explained was small (less than 5%). The updating method was substantially more efficient, taking approximately 5–10 min compared to approximately 1–2 h. Moreover, the setup of the model under the updating scheme allows for a clear specification of how neuronal variables fluctuate over separable timescales. This method now allows us to investigate the effect of fast (neuronal) activity on slow fluctuations in (synaptic) parameters, paving a way forward to understand how seizure activity is generated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4692455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46924552016-01-15 Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating Cooray, Gerald K. Sengupta, Biswa Douglas, Pamela K. Friston, Karl Neuroimage Technical Note Seizure activity in EEG recordings can persist for hours with seizure dynamics changing rapidly over time and space. To characterise the spatiotemporal evolution of seizure activity, large data sets often need to be analysed. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) can be used to estimate the synaptic drivers of cortical dynamics during a seizure; however, the requisite (Bayesian) inversion procedure is computationally expensive. In this note, we describe a straightforward procedure, within the DCM framework, that provides efficient inversion of seizure activity measured with non-invasive and invasive physiological recordings; namely, EEG/ECoG. We describe the theoretical background behind a Bayesian belief updating scheme for DCM. The scheme is tested on simulated and empirical seizure activity (recorded both invasively and non-invasively) and compared with standard Bayesian inversion. We show that the Bayesian belief updating scheme provides similar estimates of time-varying synaptic parameters, compared to standard schemes, indicating no significant qualitative change in accuracy. The difference in variance explained was small (less than 5%). The updating method was substantially more efficient, taking approximately 5–10 min compared to approximately 1–2 h. Moreover, the setup of the model under the updating scheme allows for a clear specification of how neuronal variables fluctuate over separable timescales. This method now allows us to investigate the effect of fast (neuronal) activity on slow fluctuations in (synaptic) parameters, paving a way forward to understand how seizure activity is generated. Academic Press 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4692455/ /pubmed/26220742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.063 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Cooray, Gerald K.
Sengupta, Biswa
Douglas, Pamela K.
Friston, Karl
Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title_full Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title_fullStr Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title_short Dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
title_sort dynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using bayesian belief updating
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.063
work_keys_str_mv AT cooraygeraldk dynamiccausalmodellingofelectrographicseizureactivityusingbayesianbeliefupdating
AT senguptabiswa dynamiccausalmodellingofelectrographicseizureactivityusingbayesianbeliefupdating
AT douglaspamelak dynamiccausalmodellingofelectrographicseizureactivityusingbayesianbeliefupdating
AT fristonkarl dynamiccausalmodellingofelectrographicseizureactivityusingbayesianbeliefupdating