Cargando…

Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE: Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing enables precise measurements of patient-reported outcomes at an individual level across different dimensions. This study examined the construct validity of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (CAT) for fatigue in rheumatoid arthriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolaus, Stephanie, Bode, Christina, Taal, Erik, Vonkeman, Harald E., Glas, Cees A. W., van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145008
_version_ 1782407260600795136
author Nikolaus, Stephanie
Bode, Christina
Taal, Erik
Vonkeman, Harald E.
Glas, Cees A. W.
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
author_facet Nikolaus, Stephanie
Bode, Christina
Taal, Erik
Vonkeman, Harald E.
Glas, Cees A. W.
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
author_sort Nikolaus, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing enables precise measurements of patient-reported outcomes at an individual level across different dimensions. This study examined the construct validity of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (CAT) for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The ‘CAT Fatigue RA’ was constructed based on a previously calibrated item bank. It contains 196 items and three dimensions: ‘severity’, ‘impact’ and ‘variability’ of fatigue. The CAT was administered to 166 patients with RA. They also completed a traditional, multidimensional fatigue questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) and the SF-36 in order to examine the CAT’s construct validity. A priori criterion for construct validity was that 75% of the correlations between the CAT dimensions and the subscales of the other questionnaires were as expected. Furthermore, comprehensive use of the item bank, measurement precision and score distribution were investigated. RESULTS: The a priori criterion for construct validity was supported for two of the three CAT dimensions (severity and impact but not for variability). For severity and impact, 87% of the correlations with the subscales of the well-established questionnaires were as expected but for variability, 53% of the hypothesised relations were found. Eighty-nine percent of the items were selected between one and 137 times for CAT administrations. Measurement precision was excellent for the severity and impact dimensions, with more than 90% of the CAT administrations reaching a standard error below 0.32. The variability dimension showed good measurement precision with 90% of the CAT administrations reaching a standard error below 0.44. No floor- or ceiling-effects were found for the three dimensions. CONCLUSION: The CAT Fatigue RA showed good construct validity and excellent measurement precision on the dimensions severity and impact. The dimension variability had less ideal measurement characteristics, pointing to the need to recalibrate the CAT item bank with a two-dimensional model, solely consisting of severity and impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4692469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46924692016-01-12 Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis Nikolaus, Stephanie Bode, Christina Taal, Erik Vonkeman, Harald E. Glas, Cees A. W. van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing enables precise measurements of patient-reported outcomes at an individual level across different dimensions. This study examined the construct validity of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test (CAT) for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The ‘CAT Fatigue RA’ was constructed based on a previously calibrated item bank. It contains 196 items and three dimensions: ‘severity’, ‘impact’ and ‘variability’ of fatigue. The CAT was administered to 166 patients with RA. They also completed a traditional, multidimensional fatigue questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) and the SF-36 in order to examine the CAT’s construct validity. A priori criterion for construct validity was that 75% of the correlations between the CAT dimensions and the subscales of the other questionnaires were as expected. Furthermore, comprehensive use of the item bank, measurement precision and score distribution were investigated. RESULTS: The a priori criterion for construct validity was supported for two of the three CAT dimensions (severity and impact but not for variability). For severity and impact, 87% of the correlations with the subscales of the well-established questionnaires were as expected but for variability, 53% of the hypothesised relations were found. Eighty-nine percent of the items were selected between one and 137 times for CAT administrations. Measurement precision was excellent for the severity and impact dimensions, with more than 90% of the CAT administrations reaching a standard error below 0.32. The variability dimension showed good measurement precision with 90% of the CAT administrations reaching a standard error below 0.44. No floor- or ceiling-effects were found for the three dimensions. CONCLUSION: The CAT Fatigue RA showed good construct validity and excellent measurement precision on the dimensions severity and impact. The dimension variability had less ideal measurement characteristics, pointing to the need to recalibrate the CAT item bank with a two-dimensional model, solely consisting of severity and impact. Public Library of Science 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4692469/ /pubmed/26710104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145008 Text en © 2015 Nikolaus et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nikolaus, Stephanie
Bode, Christina
Taal, Erik
Vonkeman, Harald E.
Glas, Cees A. W.
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Construct Validation of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort construct validation of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145008
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolausstephanie constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis
AT bodechristina constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis
AT taalerik constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis
AT vonkemanharalde constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis
AT glasceesaw constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis
AT vandelaarmartafj constructvalidationofamultidimensionalcomputerizedadaptivetestforfatigueinrheumatoidarthritis