Cargando…
The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x |
_version_ | 1782407296181075968 |
---|---|
author | Wu, L. de Roest, G.J. Hendriks, M.L. van Rossum, A.C. de Cock, C.C. Allaart, C.P. |
author_facet | Wu, L. de Roest, G.J. Hendriks, M.L. van Rossum, A.C. de Cock, C.C. Allaart, C.P. |
author_sort | Wu, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other factors which may partly explain non-response to CRT. This study investigates to what degree RV stimulation modulates response to biventricular (BiV) stimulation in CRT candidates and which baseline factors, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, determine this modulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 (59 %) males, 67 ± 10 years, QRS 153 ± 22 ms, 21 (51 %) ischaemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 25 ± 7 %), who successfully underwent temporary stimulation with pacing leads in the RV apex (RV(apex)) and left ventricular posterolateral (PL) wall were included. Stroke work, assessed by a conductance catheter, was used to assess acute haemodynamic response during baseline conditions and RV(apex), PL (LV) and PL+RV(apex) (BiV) stimulation. Compared with baseline, stroke work improved similarly during LV and BiV stimulation (∆+ 51 ± 42 % and ∆+ 48 ± 47 %, both p < 0.001), but individual response showed substantial differences between LV and BiV stimulation. Multivariate analysis revealed that RV ejection fraction (β = 1.01, p = 0.02) was an independent predictor for stroke work response during LV stimulation, but not for BiV stimulation. Other parameters, including atrioventricular delay and scar presence and localisation, did not predict stroke work response in CRT. CONCLUSION: The haemodynamic effect of addition of RV(apex) stimulation to LV stimulation differs widely among patients receiving CRT. Poor RV function is associated with poor response to LV but not BiV stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4692833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46928332016-01-04 The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy Wu, L. de Roest, G.J. Hendriks, M.L. van Rossum, A.C. de Cock, C.C. Allaart, C.P. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other factors which may partly explain non-response to CRT. This study investigates to what degree RV stimulation modulates response to biventricular (BiV) stimulation in CRT candidates and which baseline factors, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, determine this modulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 (59 %) males, 67 ± 10 years, QRS 153 ± 22 ms, 21 (51 %) ischaemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 25 ± 7 %), who successfully underwent temporary stimulation with pacing leads in the RV apex (RV(apex)) and left ventricular posterolateral (PL) wall were included. Stroke work, assessed by a conductance catheter, was used to assess acute haemodynamic response during baseline conditions and RV(apex), PL (LV) and PL+RV(apex) (BiV) stimulation. Compared with baseline, stroke work improved similarly during LV and BiV stimulation (∆+ 51 ± 42 % and ∆+ 48 ± 47 %, both p < 0.001), but individual response showed substantial differences between LV and BiV stimulation. Multivariate analysis revealed that RV ejection fraction (β = 1.01, p = 0.02) was an independent predictor for stroke work response during LV stimulation, but not for BiV stimulation. Other parameters, including atrioventricular delay and scar presence and localisation, did not predict stroke work response in CRT. CONCLUSION: The haemodynamic effect of addition of RV(apex) stimulation to LV stimulation differs widely among patients receiving CRT. Poor RV function is associated with poor response to LV but not BiV stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-12-09 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4692833/ /pubmed/26649436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wu, L. de Roest, G.J. Hendriks, M.L. van Rossum, A.C. de Cock, C.C. Allaart, C.P. The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title | The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_full | The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_fullStr | The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_short | The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_sort | influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wul theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT deroestgj theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT hendriksml theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT vanrossumac theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT decockcc theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT allaartcp theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT wul influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT deroestgj influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT hendriksml influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT vanrossumac influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT decockcc influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT allaartcp influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy |