Cargando…

The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy

BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, L., de Roest, G.J., Hendriks, M.L., van Rossum, A.C., de Cock, C.C., Allaart, C.P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x
_version_ 1782407296181075968
author Wu, L.
de Roest, G.J.
Hendriks, M.L.
van Rossum, A.C.
de Cock, C.C.
Allaart, C.P.
author_facet Wu, L.
de Roest, G.J.
Hendriks, M.L.
van Rossum, A.C.
de Cock, C.C.
Allaart, C.P.
author_sort Wu, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other factors which may partly explain non-response to CRT. This study investigates to what degree RV stimulation modulates response to biventricular (BiV) stimulation in CRT candidates and which baseline factors, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, determine this modulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 (59 %) males, 67 ± 10 years, QRS 153 ± 22 ms, 21 (51 %) ischaemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 25 ± 7 %), who successfully underwent temporary stimulation with pacing leads in the RV apex (RV(apex)) and left ventricular posterolateral (PL) wall were included. Stroke work, assessed by a conductance catheter, was used to assess acute haemodynamic response during baseline conditions and RV(apex), PL (LV) and PL+RV(apex) (BiV) stimulation. Compared with baseline, stroke work improved similarly during LV and BiV stimulation (∆+ 51 ± 42 % and ∆+ 48 ± 47 %, both p < 0.001), but individual response showed substantial differences between LV and BiV stimulation. Multivariate analysis revealed that RV ejection fraction (β = 1.01, p = 0.02) was an independent predictor for stroke work response during LV stimulation, but not for BiV stimulation. Other parameters, including atrioventricular delay and scar presence and localisation, did not predict stroke work response in CRT. CONCLUSION: The haemodynamic effect of addition of RV(apex) stimulation to LV stimulation differs widely among patients receiving CRT. Poor RV function is associated with poor response to LV but not BiV stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4692833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46928332016-01-04 The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy Wu, L. de Roest, G.J. Hendriks, M.L. van Rossum, A.C. de Cock, C.C. Allaart, C.P. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The contribution of right ventricular (RV) stimulation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains controversial. RV stimulation might be associated with adverse haemodynamic effects, dependent on intrinsic right bundle branch conduction, presence of scar, RV function and other factors which may partly explain non-response to CRT. This study investigates to what degree RV stimulation modulates response to biventricular (BiV) stimulation in CRT candidates and which baseline factors, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, determine this modulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 (59 %) males, 67 ± 10 years, QRS 153 ± 22 ms, 21 (51 %) ischaemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 25 ± 7 %), who successfully underwent temporary stimulation with pacing leads in the RV apex (RV(apex)) and left ventricular posterolateral (PL) wall were included. Stroke work, assessed by a conductance catheter, was used to assess acute haemodynamic response during baseline conditions and RV(apex), PL (LV) and PL+RV(apex) (BiV) stimulation. Compared with baseline, stroke work improved similarly during LV and BiV stimulation (∆+ 51 ± 42 % and ∆+ 48 ± 47 %, both p < 0.001), but individual response showed substantial differences between LV and BiV stimulation. Multivariate analysis revealed that RV ejection fraction (β = 1.01, p = 0.02) was an independent predictor for stroke work response during LV stimulation, but not for BiV stimulation. Other parameters, including atrioventricular delay and scar presence and localisation, did not predict stroke work response in CRT. CONCLUSION: The haemodynamic effect of addition of RV(apex) stimulation to LV stimulation differs widely among patients receiving CRT. Poor RV function is associated with poor response to LV but not BiV stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-12-09 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4692833/ /pubmed/26649436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, L.
de Roest, G.J.
Hendriks, M.L.
van Rossum, A.C.
de Cock, C.C.
Allaart, C.P.
The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_full The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_fullStr The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_full_unstemmed The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_short The influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_sort influence of right ventricular stimulation on acute response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0770-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wul theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT deroestgj theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT hendriksml theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT vanrossumac theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT decockcc theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT allaartcp theinfluenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT wul influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT deroestgj influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT hendriksml influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT vanrossumac influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT decockcc influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT allaartcp influenceofrightventricularstimulationonacuteresponsetocardiacresynchronisationtherapy