Cargando…

Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations

Sepsis is a common condition with a major global impact on healthcare resources and expenditure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has been vigorous in promoting internationally recognised pathways to improve the management of septic patients and decrease mortality. However, translating recommendations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Prashant, Jordan, Mark, Caesar, Jenny, Miller, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032
_version_ 1782407313776181248
author Kumar, Prashant
Jordan, Mark
Caesar, Jenny
Miller, Sarah
author_facet Kumar, Prashant
Jordan, Mark
Caesar, Jenny
Miller, Sarah
author_sort Kumar, Prashant
collection PubMed
description Sepsis is a common condition with a major global impact on healthcare resources and expenditure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has been vigorous in promoting internationally recognised pathways to improve the management of septic patients and decrease mortality. However, translating recommendations into practice is a challenging and complex task that requires a multi-faceted approach with sustained engagement from local stakeholders. Whilst working at a district general hospital in New Zealand, we were concerned by the seemingly inconsistent management of septic patients, often leading to long delays in the initiation of life-saving measures such as antibiotic, fluid, and oxygen administration. In our hospital there were no clear systems, protocols or guidelines in place for identifying and managing septic patients. We therefore launched the Sepsis Six resuscitation bundle of care in our hospital in an attempt to raise awareness amongst staff and improve the management of septic patients. We introduced a number of simple low-cost interventions that included educational sessions for junior doctors and nursing staff, as well as posters and modifications to phlebotomy trolleys that acted as visual reminders to implement the Sepsis Six bundle. Overall, we found there to a be a steady improvement in the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle in septic patients with 63% of patients receiving appropriate care within one hour, compared to 29% prior to our interventions. However this did not translate to an improvement in patient mortality. This project forms part of an on going process to instigate a fundamental culture change among local healthcare professionals regarding the management of sepsis. Whilst we have demonstrated improved implementation of the Sepsis Six bundle, the key challenge remains to ensure that momentum of this project continues and forms a platform for sustainable clinical improvement in the long term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4693057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46930572016-01-05 Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations Kumar, Prashant Jordan, Mark Caesar, Jenny Miller, Sarah BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Sepsis is a common condition with a major global impact on healthcare resources and expenditure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has been vigorous in promoting internationally recognised pathways to improve the management of septic patients and decrease mortality. However, translating recommendations into practice is a challenging and complex task that requires a multi-faceted approach with sustained engagement from local stakeholders. Whilst working at a district general hospital in New Zealand, we were concerned by the seemingly inconsistent management of septic patients, often leading to long delays in the initiation of life-saving measures such as antibiotic, fluid, and oxygen administration. In our hospital there were no clear systems, protocols or guidelines in place for identifying and managing septic patients. We therefore launched the Sepsis Six resuscitation bundle of care in our hospital in an attempt to raise awareness amongst staff and improve the management of septic patients. We introduced a number of simple low-cost interventions that included educational sessions for junior doctors and nursing staff, as well as posters and modifications to phlebotomy trolleys that acted as visual reminders to implement the Sepsis Six bundle. Overall, we found there to a be a steady improvement in the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle in septic patients with 63% of patients receiving appropriate care within one hour, compared to 29% prior to our interventions. However this did not translate to an improvement in patient mortality. This project forms part of an on going process to instigate a fundamental culture change among local healthcare professionals regarding the management of sepsis. Whilst we have demonstrated improved implementation of the Sepsis Six bundle, the key challenge remains to ensure that momentum of this project continues and forms a platform for sustainable clinical improvement in the long term. British Publishing Group 2015-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4693057/ /pubmed/26734403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Kumar, Prashant
Jordan, Mark
Caesar, Jenny
Miller, Sarah
Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title_full Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title_fullStr Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title_short Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ recommendations
title_sort improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the ‘sepsis six’ recommendations
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarprashant improvingthemanagementofsepsisinadistrictgeneralhospitalbyimplementingthesepsissixrecommendations
AT jordanmark improvingthemanagementofsepsisinadistrictgeneralhospitalbyimplementingthesepsissixrecommendations
AT caesarjenny improvingthemanagementofsepsisinadistrictgeneralhospitalbyimplementingthesepsissixrecommendations
AT millersarah improvingthemanagementofsepsisinadistrictgeneralhospitalbyimplementingthesepsissixrecommendations