Cargando…
How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721 |
_version_ | 1782407314709413888 |
---|---|
author | Mouko, Josie Goddard, Aurielle Nimmo-Smith, Victoria |
author_facet | Mouko, Josie Goddard, Aurielle Nimmo-Smith, Victoria |
author_sort | Mouko, Josie |
collection | PubMed |
description | A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours, but cannot receive treatment against their will, unless assessed as lacking the capacity to refuse treatment. Issues requiring medical input arose in more than a third of patients, yet there was little guidance for trainees around the PoS. We conducted a survey which confirmed that robust clinical guidance was needed for junior doctors around medical assistance in this unique environment. We identified specific concerns around patient safety in relation to alcohol withdrawal, uncertainties around legislation and lack of clarity of who to call out of hours. Trainees felt they were working outside of their expertise. We collaborated with a variety of professionals to produce clinical guidance in line with best evidence, and made this easily accessible. We also gained a consensus that more experienced core trainees (SHOs) in Psychiatry should be the first point of contact. We then conducted a survey in June 2015, and found that doctors covering the PoS now felt there was sufficient guidance on most clinical scenarios, 100% consensus on who to contact and improved confidence in their ability to manage issues arising. In August 2015 we held an informal training session for the new intake of trainees on the rota. A subsequent survey revealed similarly positive results. Through this project, we were able to identify defects in a system, provide needed guidance to enable safer and more equitable care to a vulnerable group, and foster closer collaboration between junior doctors and managers in the design and use of services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4693061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46930612016-01-05 How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act Mouko, Josie Goddard, Aurielle Nimmo-Smith, Victoria BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours, but cannot receive treatment against their will, unless assessed as lacking the capacity to refuse treatment. Issues requiring medical input arose in more than a third of patients, yet there was little guidance for trainees around the PoS. We conducted a survey which confirmed that robust clinical guidance was needed for junior doctors around medical assistance in this unique environment. We identified specific concerns around patient safety in relation to alcohol withdrawal, uncertainties around legislation and lack of clarity of who to call out of hours. Trainees felt they were working outside of their expertise. We collaborated with a variety of professionals to produce clinical guidance in line with best evidence, and made this easily accessible. We also gained a consensus that more experienced core trainees (SHOs) in Psychiatry should be the first point of contact. We then conducted a survey in June 2015, and found that doctors covering the PoS now felt there was sufficient guidance on most clinical scenarios, 100% consensus on who to contact and improved confidence in their ability to manage issues arising. In August 2015 we held an informal training session for the new intake of trainees on the rota. A subsequent survey revealed similarly positive results. Through this project, we were able to identify defects in a system, provide needed guidance to enable safer and more equitable care to a vulnerable group, and foster closer collaboration between junior doctors and managers in the design and use of services. British Publishing Group 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4693061/ /pubmed/26734407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Mouko, Josie Goddard, Aurielle Nimmo-Smith, Victoria How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title | How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title_full | How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title_fullStr | How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title_full_unstemmed | How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title_short | How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act |
title_sort | how safe is our “place of safety”? clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the mental health act |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moukojosie howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact AT goddardaurielle howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact AT nimmosmithvictoria howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact |