Cargando…

How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act

A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mouko, Josie, Goddard, Aurielle, Nimmo-Smith, Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721
_version_ 1782407314709413888
author Mouko, Josie
Goddard, Aurielle
Nimmo-Smith, Victoria
author_facet Mouko, Josie
Goddard, Aurielle
Nimmo-Smith, Victoria
author_sort Mouko, Josie
collection PubMed
description A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours, but cannot receive treatment against their will, unless assessed as lacking the capacity to refuse treatment. Issues requiring medical input arose in more than a third of patients, yet there was little guidance for trainees around the PoS. We conducted a survey which confirmed that robust clinical guidance was needed for junior doctors around medical assistance in this unique environment. We identified specific concerns around patient safety in relation to alcohol withdrawal, uncertainties around legislation and lack of clarity of who to call out of hours. Trainees felt they were working outside of their expertise. We collaborated with a variety of professionals to produce clinical guidance in line with best evidence, and made this easily accessible. We also gained a consensus that more experienced core trainees (SHOs) in Psychiatry should be the first point of contact. We then conducted a survey in June 2015, and found that doctors covering the PoS now felt there was sufficient guidance on most clinical scenarios, 100% consensus on who to contact and improved confidence in their ability to manage issues arising. In August 2015 we held an informal training session for the new intake of trainees on the rota. A subsequent survey revealed similarly positive results. Through this project, we were able to identify defects in a system, provide needed guidance to enable safer and more equitable care to a vulnerable group, and foster closer collaboration between junior doctors and managers in the design and use of services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4693061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46930612016-01-05 How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act Mouko, Josie Goddard, Aurielle Nimmo-Smith, Victoria BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme A new four-bed unit was opened in Bristol, UK, in 2014, for people detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Police bring individuals posing a risk to themselves or others to a Place of Safety (PoS) in order to receive a mental health assessment. Individuals may be held for up to 72 hours, but cannot receive treatment against their will, unless assessed as lacking the capacity to refuse treatment. Issues requiring medical input arose in more than a third of patients, yet there was little guidance for trainees around the PoS. We conducted a survey which confirmed that robust clinical guidance was needed for junior doctors around medical assistance in this unique environment. We identified specific concerns around patient safety in relation to alcohol withdrawal, uncertainties around legislation and lack of clarity of who to call out of hours. Trainees felt they were working outside of their expertise. We collaborated with a variety of professionals to produce clinical guidance in line with best evidence, and made this easily accessible. We also gained a consensus that more experienced core trainees (SHOs) in Psychiatry should be the first point of contact. We then conducted a survey in June 2015, and found that doctors covering the PoS now felt there was sufficient guidance on most clinical scenarios, 100% consensus on who to contact and improved confidence in their ability to manage issues arising. In August 2015 we held an informal training session for the new intake of trainees on the rota. A subsequent survey revealed similarly positive results. Through this project, we were able to identify defects in a system, provide needed guidance to enable safer and more equitable care to a vulnerable group, and foster closer collaboration between junior doctors and managers in the design and use of services. British Publishing Group 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4693061/ /pubmed/26734407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721 Text en © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Mouko, Josie
Goddard, Aurielle
Nimmo-Smith, Victoria
How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title_full How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title_fullStr How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title_full_unstemmed How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title_short How safe is our “place of safety”? Clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act
title_sort how safe is our “place of safety”? clinical guidance promoting safer medical care of patients detained under section 136 of the mental health act
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209141.w3721
work_keys_str_mv AT moukojosie howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact
AT goddardaurielle howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact
AT nimmosmithvictoria howsafeisourplaceofsafetyclinicalguidancepromotingsafermedicalcareofpatientsdetainedundersection136ofthementalhealthact