Cargando…

Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis

AIM: To evaluate the sealing ability of ProRooT MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials using dye extraction leakage method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five mandibular molars were randomly divided into four groups according to the material used for perforation repair. Group I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant, Patil, Sanjay S, Jogad, Nitin P, Gade, Vandana J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168803
_version_ 1782407361330151424
author Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant
Patil, Sanjay S
Jogad, Nitin P
Gade, Vandana J
author_facet Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant
Patil, Sanjay S
Jogad, Nitin P
Gade, Vandana J
author_sort Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the sealing ability of ProRooT MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials using dye extraction leakage method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five mandibular molars were randomly divided into four groups according to the material used for perforation repair. Group I — ProRoot MTA (10 samples), Group II — RetroMTA (10 samples), Group III — Biodentine (10 samples), and Group IV (Control) — left unrepaired (5 samples). All samples were subjected to orthograde and retrograde Methylene blue dye challenge followed by dye extraction with concentration 65% nitric acid. Samples were then analyzed using ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer using 550 nm wave lengths. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: Biodentine showed least dye absorbance while RetroMTA showed highest dye absorbance values when compared with other repair materials. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it was observed that Biodentine showed better sealing ability when compared with other root repair materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4693315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46933152016-01-08 Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant Patil, Sanjay S Jogad, Nitin P Gade, Vandana J J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate the sealing ability of ProRooT MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials using dye extraction leakage method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five mandibular molars were randomly divided into four groups according to the material used for perforation repair. Group I — ProRoot MTA (10 samples), Group II — RetroMTA (10 samples), Group III — Biodentine (10 samples), and Group IV (Control) — left unrepaired (5 samples). All samples were subjected to orthograde and retrograde Methylene blue dye challenge followed by dye extraction with concentration 65% nitric acid. Samples were then analyzed using ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer using 550 nm wave lengths. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: Biodentine showed least dye absorbance while RetroMTA showed highest dye absorbance values when compared with other repair materials. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it was observed that Biodentine showed better sealing ability when compared with other root repair materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4693315/ /pubmed/26752836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168803 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sinkar, Roshan Chandrakant
Patil, Sanjay S
Jogad, Nitin P
Gade, Vandana J
Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title_full Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title_short Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
title_sort comparison of sealing ability of proroot mta, retromta, and biodentine as furcation repair materials: an ultraviolet spectrophotometric analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168803
work_keys_str_mv AT sinkarroshanchandrakant comparisonofsealingabilityofprorootmtaretromtaandbiodentineasfurcationrepairmaterialsanultravioletspectrophotometricanalysis
AT patilsanjays comparisonofsealingabilityofprorootmtaretromtaandbiodentineasfurcationrepairmaterialsanultravioletspectrophotometricanalysis
AT jogadnitinp comparisonofsealingabilityofprorootmtaretromtaandbiodentineasfurcationrepairmaterialsanultravioletspectrophotometricanalysis
AT gadevandanaj comparisonofsealingabilityofprorootmtaretromtaandbiodentineasfurcationrepairmaterialsanultravioletspectrophotometricanalysis