Cargando…
One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805 |
_version_ | 1782407361566081024 |
---|---|
author | Vaid, Deepa Sunil Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad |
author_facet | Vaid, Deepa Sunil Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad |
author_sort | Vaid, Deepa Sunil |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for the restoration of NCCLs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven NCCLs were randomly restored with EQUIA, a RMGIC, and a nanohybrid composite. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was done following the Unites States Public Health criteria by a single-blinded investigator. Data were formulated, and statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between EQUIA, RMGIC, and nanohybrid composite at 1-month, at 6 months, and at 1-year (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA, resin-modified glass ionomer, and nanohybrid composite performed equally at 1-month, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up periods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4693316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46933162016-01-08 One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions Vaid, Deepa Sunil Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for the restoration of NCCLs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven NCCLs were randomly restored with EQUIA, a RMGIC, and a nanohybrid composite. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was done following the Unites States Public Health criteria by a single-blinded investigator. Data were formulated, and statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between EQUIA, RMGIC, and nanohybrid composite at 1-month, at 6 months, and at 1-year (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA, resin-modified glass ionomer, and nanohybrid composite performed equally at 1-month, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up periods. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4693316/ /pubmed/26752837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vaid, Deepa Sunil Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title | One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_full | One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_fullStr | One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_short | One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_sort | one year comparative clinical evaluation of equia with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaiddeepasunil oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions AT shahnimishachinmay oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions AT bilgipriyankashripad oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions |