Cargando…

One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions

AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaid, Deepa Sunil, Shah, Nimisha Chinmay, Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752837
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805
_version_ 1782407361566081024
author Vaid, Deepa Sunil
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad
author_facet Vaid, Deepa Sunil
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad
author_sort Vaid, Deepa Sunil
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for the restoration of NCCLs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven NCCLs were randomly restored with EQUIA, a RMGIC, and a nanohybrid composite. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was done following the Unites States Public Health criteria by a single-blinded investigator. Data were formulated, and statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between EQUIA, RMGIC, and nanohybrid composite at 1-month, at 6 months, and at 1-year (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA, resin-modified glass ionomer, and nanohybrid composite performed equally at 1-month, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4693316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46933162016-01-08 One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions Vaid, Deepa Sunil Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: Comparative evaluation of EQUIA with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; GC Gold Label glass ionomer light cured universal restorative cement) and a nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). BACKGROUND: To establish the most suitable material for the restoration of NCCLs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven NCCLs were randomly restored with EQUIA, a RMGIC, and a nanohybrid composite. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was done following the Unites States Public Health criteria by a single-blinded investigator. Data were formulated, and statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between EQUIA, RMGIC, and nanohybrid composite at 1-month, at 6 months, and at 1-year (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA, resin-modified glass ionomer, and nanohybrid composite performed equally at 1-month, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up periods. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4693316/ /pubmed/26752837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vaid, Deepa Sunil
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Bilgi, Priyanka Shripad
One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title_full One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title_fullStr One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title_full_unstemmed One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title_short One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
title_sort one year comparative clinical evaluation of equia with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752837
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168805
work_keys_str_mv AT vaiddeepasunil oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions
AT shahnimishachinmay oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions
AT bilgipriyankashripad oneyearcomparativeclinicalevaluationofequiawithresinmodifiedglassionomerandananohybridcompositeinnoncariouscervicallesions