Cargando…

Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study

AIM: To compare the fracture resistance exhibited by teeth after primary endodontic treatment and retreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred freshly extracted human teeth were selected. 20 samples served as control (untreated). Eighty experimental samples were divided into two groups (n = 40) f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalap, Neha Deepak, Hegde, Vibha, Kokate, Sharad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168808
_version_ 1782407361788379136
author Khalap, Neha Deepak
Hegde, Vibha
Kokate, Sharad
author_facet Khalap, Neha Deepak
Hegde, Vibha
Kokate, Sharad
author_sort Khalap, Neha Deepak
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the fracture resistance exhibited by teeth after primary endodontic treatment and retreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred freshly extracted human teeth were selected. 20 samples served as control (untreated). Eighty experimental samples were divided into two groups (n = 40) for instrumentation using rotary Protaper NEXT (PTN) or reciprocating WaveOne (WO) files and obturated using warm lateral compaction. Half of the samples (n = 20) from each group were subjected to a load. The remaining half were subjected to retreatment using Protaper universal retreatment files (RFs) followed by a file larger than the master apical file used in groups 1 and 2 and reobturated. Group A: Control, Group B: PTN + obturation, Group C: WO + obturation, Group D: RF + PTN + obturation and Group E: RF + WO + obturation. The retreatment specimens were also subjected to load and the readings acquired were statistically analyzed. RESULT: When compared between the groups, control group exhibited the highest fracture resistance (P < 0.01). When multiple tests were performed, Group E exhibited significantly less fracture resistance (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Endodontic treatment and retreatment both results in lowering the fracture resistance of a tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4693317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46933172016-01-08 Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study Khalap, Neha Deepak Hegde, Vibha Kokate, Sharad J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To compare the fracture resistance exhibited by teeth after primary endodontic treatment and retreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred freshly extracted human teeth were selected. 20 samples served as control (untreated). Eighty experimental samples were divided into two groups (n = 40) for instrumentation using rotary Protaper NEXT (PTN) or reciprocating WaveOne (WO) files and obturated using warm lateral compaction. Half of the samples (n = 20) from each group were subjected to a load. The remaining half were subjected to retreatment using Protaper universal retreatment files (RFs) followed by a file larger than the master apical file used in groups 1 and 2 and reobturated. Group A: Control, Group B: PTN + obturation, Group C: WO + obturation, Group D: RF + PTN + obturation and Group E: RF + WO + obturation. The retreatment specimens were also subjected to load and the readings acquired were statistically analyzed. RESULT: When compared between the groups, control group exhibited the highest fracture resistance (P < 0.01). When multiple tests were performed, Group E exhibited significantly less fracture resistance (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Endodontic treatment and retreatment both results in lowering the fracture resistance of a tooth. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4693317/ /pubmed/26752838 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168808 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khalap, Neha Deepak
Hegde, Vibha
Kokate, Sharad
Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title_full Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title_short Fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by ProTaper NEXT versus WaveOne: An in vitro study
title_sort fracture resistance exhibited by endodontically treated and retreated teeth shaped by protaper next versus waveone: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4693317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168808
work_keys_str_mv AT khalapnehadeepak fractureresistanceexhibitedbyendodonticallytreatedandretreatedteethshapedbyprotapernextversuswaveoneaninvitrostudy
AT hegdevibha fractureresistanceexhibitedbyendodonticallytreatedandretreatedteethshapedbyprotapernextversuswaveoneaninvitrostudy
AT kokatesharad fractureresistanceexhibitedbyendodonticallytreatedandretreatedteethshapedbyprotapernextversuswaveoneaninvitrostudy