Cargando…

Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials

Noncompliance with study medications is an important issue in the design of endpoint clinical trials. Including noncompliant patient data in an intention-to-treat analysis could seriously decrease study power. Standard methods for calculating sample size account for noncompliance, but all assume tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snapinn, Steven M, Jiang, Qi, Iglewicz, Boris
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC469444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15233844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-5
_version_ 1782121626153779200
author Snapinn, Steven M
Jiang, Qi
Iglewicz, Boris
author_facet Snapinn, Steven M
Jiang, Qi
Iglewicz, Boris
author_sort Snapinn, Steven M
collection PubMed
description Noncompliance with study medications is an important issue in the design of endpoint clinical trials. Including noncompliant patient data in an intention-to-treat analysis could seriously decrease study power. Standard methods for calculating sample size account for noncompliance, but all assume that noncompliance is noninformative, i.e., that the risk of discontinuation is independent of the risk of experiencing a study endpoint. Using data from several published clinical trials (OPTIMAAL, LIFE, RENAAL, SOLVD-Prevention and SOLVD-Treatment), we demonstrate that this assumption is often untrue, and we discuss the effect of informative noncompliance on power and sample size.
format Text
id pubmed-469444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4694442004-07-16 Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials Snapinn, Steven M Jiang, Qi Iglewicz, Boris Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Review Noncompliance with study medications is an important issue in the design of endpoint clinical trials. Including noncompliant patient data in an intention-to-treat analysis could seriously decrease study power. Standard methods for calculating sample size account for noncompliance, but all assume that noncompliance is noninformative, i.e., that the risk of discontinuation is independent of the risk of experiencing a study endpoint. Using data from several published clinical trials (OPTIMAAL, LIFE, RENAAL, SOLVD-Prevention and SOLVD-Treatment), we demonstrate that this assumption is often untrue, and we discuss the effect of informative noncompliance on power and sample size. BioMed Central 2004 2004-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC469444/ /pubmed/15233844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-5 Text en Copyright © 2004 Snapinn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Review
Snapinn, Steven M
Jiang, Qi
Iglewicz, Boris
Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title_full Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title_fullStr Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title_full_unstemmed Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title_short Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
title_sort informative noncompliance in endpoint trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC469444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15233844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-5
work_keys_str_mv AT snapinnstevenm informativenoncomplianceinendpointtrials
AT jiangqi informativenoncomplianceinendpointtrials
AT iglewiczboris informativenoncomplianceinendpointtrials