Cargando…

A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models

Many cancer cells rely on aerobic glycolysis for energy production and targeting of this pathway is a potential strategy to inhibit cancer cell growth. In this study, inhibition of five glycolysis pathway molecules (GLUT1, HKII, PFKFB3, PDHK1 and LDH) using 9 inhibitors (Phloretin, Quercetin, STF31,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xintaropoulou, Chrysi, Ward, Carol, Wise, Alan, Marston, Hugh, Turnbull, Arran, Langdon, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4694858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26259240
_version_ 1782407538828902400
author Xintaropoulou, Chrysi
Ward, Carol
Wise, Alan
Marston, Hugh
Turnbull, Arran
Langdon, Simon P.
author_facet Xintaropoulou, Chrysi
Ward, Carol
Wise, Alan
Marston, Hugh
Turnbull, Arran
Langdon, Simon P.
author_sort Xintaropoulou, Chrysi
collection PubMed
description Many cancer cells rely on aerobic glycolysis for energy production and targeting of this pathway is a potential strategy to inhibit cancer cell growth. In this study, inhibition of five glycolysis pathway molecules (GLUT1, HKII, PFKFB3, PDHK1 and LDH) using 9 inhibitors (Phloretin, Quercetin, STF31, WZB117, 3PO, 3-bromopyruvate, Dichloroacetate, Oxamic acid, NHI-1) was investigated in panels of breast and ovarian cancer cell line models. All compounds tested blocked glycolysis as indicated by increased extracellular glucose and decreased lactate production and also increased apoptosis. Sensitivity to several inhibitors correlated with the proliferation rate of the cell lines. Seven compounds had IC(50) values that were associated with each other consistent with a shared mechanism of action. A synergistic interaction was revealed between STF31 and Oxamic acid when combined with the antidiabetic drug metformin. Sensitivity to glycolysis inhibition was also examined under a range of O(2) levels (21% O(2), 7% O(2), 2% O(2) and 0.5% O(2)) and greater resistance to the inhibitors was found at low oxygen conditions (7% O(2), 2% O(2) and 0.5% O(2)) relative to 21% O(2) conditions. These results indicate growth of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines is dependent on all the targets examined in the glycolytic pathway with increased sensitivity to the inhibitors under normoxic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4694858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46948582016-01-20 A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models Xintaropoulou, Chrysi Ward, Carol Wise, Alan Marston, Hugh Turnbull, Arran Langdon, Simon P. Oncotarget Research Paper Many cancer cells rely on aerobic glycolysis for energy production and targeting of this pathway is a potential strategy to inhibit cancer cell growth. In this study, inhibition of five glycolysis pathway molecules (GLUT1, HKII, PFKFB3, PDHK1 and LDH) using 9 inhibitors (Phloretin, Quercetin, STF31, WZB117, 3PO, 3-bromopyruvate, Dichloroacetate, Oxamic acid, NHI-1) was investigated in panels of breast and ovarian cancer cell line models. All compounds tested blocked glycolysis as indicated by increased extracellular glucose and decreased lactate production and also increased apoptosis. Sensitivity to several inhibitors correlated with the proliferation rate of the cell lines. Seven compounds had IC(50) values that were associated with each other consistent with a shared mechanism of action. A synergistic interaction was revealed between STF31 and Oxamic acid when combined with the antidiabetic drug metformin. Sensitivity to glycolysis inhibition was also examined under a range of O(2) levels (21% O(2), 7% O(2), 2% O(2) and 0.5% O(2)) and greater resistance to the inhibitors was found at low oxygen conditions (7% O(2), 2% O(2) and 0.5% O(2)) relative to 21% O(2) conditions. These results indicate growth of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines is dependent on all the targets examined in the glycolytic pathway with increased sensitivity to the inhibitors under normoxic conditions. Impact Journals LLC 2015-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4694858/ /pubmed/26259240 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Xintaropoulou et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Xintaropoulou, Chrysi
Ward, Carol
Wise, Alan
Marston, Hugh
Turnbull, Arran
Langdon, Simon P.
A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title_full A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title_short A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
title_sort comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4694858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26259240
work_keys_str_mv AT xintaropoulouchrysi acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT wardcarol acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT wisealan acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT marstonhugh acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT turnbullarran acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT langdonsimonp acomparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT xintaropoulouchrysi comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT wardcarol comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT wisealan comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT marstonhugh comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT turnbullarran comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels
AT langdonsimonp comparativeanalysisofinhibitorsoftheglycolysispathwayinbreastandovariancancercelllinemodels