Cargando…
Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP), D-penicillamine (DPM), methotrexate (MTX), or azathioprine (AZP). Since the optimum treatment regimen remains inconclus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109432 |
_version_ | 1782407620645093376 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Gui-Qi Huang, Sha Huang, Gui-Qian Wang, Li-Ren Lin, Yi-Qian Wu, Yi-Ming Shi, Ke-Qing Wang, Jiang-Tao Zhou, Zhi-Rui Braddock, Martin Chen, Yong-Ping Zhou, Meng-Tao Zheng, Ming-Hua |
author_facet | Zhu, Gui-Qi Huang, Sha Huang, Gui-Qian Wang, Li-Ren Lin, Yi-Qian Wu, Yi-Ming Shi, Ke-Qing Wang, Jiang-Tao Zhou, Zhi-Rui Braddock, Martin Chen, Yong-Ping Zhou, Meng-Tao Zheng, Ming-Hua |
author_sort | Zhu, Gui-Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP), D-penicillamine (DPM), methotrexate (MTX), or azathioprine (AZP). Since the optimum treatment regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these therapies in terms of patient mortality or liver transplantation (MOLT) and adverse event (AE). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials until August 2014. We estimated HRs for MOLT and ORs for AE. The sensitivity analysis based on dose of UDCA was also performed. RESULTS: The search identified 49 studies involving 12 different treatment regimens and 4182 patients. Although no statistical significance can be found in MOLT, COT plus UDCA was ranked highest for efficacy outcome amongst all the treatment regimes. While for AEs, compared with OBS or UDCA, monotherapy with COC (OR 5.6, P < 0.001; OR 5.89, P < 0.001), CYP (OR 3.24, P < 0.001; OR 3.42, P < 0.001), DPM (OR 8.00, P < 0.001; OR 8.45, P < 0.001) and MTX (OR 5.31, P < 0.001; OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significant increased risk of AEs. No significant differences were found for other combination regimes. Effect estimates from indirect comparisons matched closely to estimates derived from pairwise comparisons. Consistently, in the sensitivity analysis, results closely resembled our primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: COT plus UDCA was the most efficacious among treatment regimens both for MOLT and AEs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4695204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46952042016-01-26 Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Zhu, Gui-Qi Huang, Sha Huang, Gui-Qian Wang, Li-Ren Lin, Yi-Qian Wu, Yi-Ming Shi, Ke-Qing Wang, Jiang-Tao Zhou, Zhi-Rui Braddock, Martin Chen, Yong-Ping Zhou, Meng-Tao Zheng, Ming-Hua Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP), D-penicillamine (DPM), methotrexate (MTX), or azathioprine (AZP). Since the optimum treatment regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these therapies in terms of patient mortality or liver transplantation (MOLT) and adverse event (AE). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials until August 2014. We estimated HRs for MOLT and ORs for AE. The sensitivity analysis based on dose of UDCA was also performed. RESULTS: The search identified 49 studies involving 12 different treatment regimens and 4182 patients. Although no statistical significance can be found in MOLT, COT plus UDCA was ranked highest for efficacy outcome amongst all the treatment regimes. While for AEs, compared with OBS or UDCA, monotherapy with COC (OR 5.6, P < 0.001; OR 5.89, P < 0.001), CYP (OR 3.24, P < 0.001; OR 3.42, P < 0.001), DPM (OR 8.00, P < 0.001; OR 8.45, P < 0.001) and MTX (OR 5.31, P < 0.001; OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significant increased risk of AEs. No significant differences were found for other combination regimes. Effect estimates from indirect comparisons matched closely to estimates derived from pairwise comparisons. Consistently, in the sensitivity analysis, results closely resembled our primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: COT plus UDCA was the most efficacious among treatment regimens both for MOLT and AEs. Impact Journals LLC 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4695204/ /pubmed/26109432 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Zhu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Zhu, Gui-Qi Huang, Sha Huang, Gui-Qian Wang, Li-Ren Lin, Yi-Qian Wu, Yi-Ming Shi, Ke-Qing Wang, Jiang-Tao Zhou, Zhi-Rui Braddock, Martin Chen, Yong-Ping Zhou, Meng-Tao Zheng, Ming-Hua Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | optimal drug regimens for primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuguiqi optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT huangsha optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT huangguiqian optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangliren optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT linyiqian optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wuyiming optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shikeqing optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangjiangtao optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhouzhirui optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT braddockmartin optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenyongping optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhoumengtao optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhengminghua optimaldrugregimensforprimarybiliarycirrhosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |