Cargando…

The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data

Objectives. The prognostic factors of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies from 1974 to February 2015. In absence of quality difference between studies of reporting signi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yang, Gao, Wen, Xu, Jiali, Chen, Xiaojun, Yang, Yang, Zhu, Yizhi, Yin, Yongmei, Guo, Renhua, Liu, Ping, Shu, Yongqian, Liu, Lingxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/763080
_version_ 1782407664224960512
author Wang, Yang
Gao, Wen
Xu, Jiali
Chen, Xiaojun
Yang, Yang
Zhu, Yizhi
Yin, Yongmei
Guo, Renhua
Liu, Ping
Shu, Yongqian
Liu, Lingxiang
author_facet Wang, Yang
Gao, Wen
Xu, Jiali
Chen, Xiaojun
Yang, Yang
Zhu, Yizhi
Yin, Yongmei
Guo, Renhua
Liu, Ping
Shu, Yongqian
Liu, Lingxiang
author_sort Wang, Yang
collection PubMed
description Objectives. The prognostic factors of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies from 1974 to February 2015. In absence of quality difference between studies of reporting significant and nonsignificant results, the relationship between FGFR1 amplification and clinicopathological parameters in NSCLC was analyzed. And also the combined hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in terms of overall survival. Results. 3178 patients (12 studies) were included in the analysis. It was shown that FGFR1 amplification was significantly more prevalent among male patients (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.57–2.63) with squamous cell lung cancer (SQCC) (RR 3.49, 95% CI 2.62–4.64) and current smokers (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.92–3.60). The pooled data also showed that the FGFR1 amplification was a poor prognostic factor in SQCC (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07–1.78), Asian patients (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22–2.60), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.58). Conclusions. This meta-analysis strongly suggests that FGFR1 amplification occurs more frequently in male, SQCC and smokers, and it is a risk factor for poor prognosis among Asian patients with SQCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4695660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46956602016-01-19 The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data Wang, Yang Gao, Wen Xu, Jiali Chen, Xiaojun Yang, Yang Zhu, Yizhi Yin, Yongmei Guo, Renhua Liu, Ping Shu, Yongqian Liu, Lingxiang Biomed Res Int Research Article Objectives. The prognostic factors of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies from 1974 to February 2015. In absence of quality difference between studies of reporting significant and nonsignificant results, the relationship between FGFR1 amplification and clinicopathological parameters in NSCLC was analyzed. And also the combined hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in terms of overall survival. Results. 3178 patients (12 studies) were included in the analysis. It was shown that FGFR1 amplification was significantly more prevalent among male patients (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.57–2.63) with squamous cell lung cancer (SQCC) (RR 3.49, 95% CI 2.62–4.64) and current smokers (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.92–3.60). The pooled data also showed that the FGFR1 amplification was a poor prognostic factor in SQCC (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07–1.78), Asian patients (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22–2.60), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.58). Conclusions. This meta-analysis strongly suggests that FGFR1 amplification occurs more frequently in male, SQCC and smokers, and it is a risk factor for poor prognosis among Asian patients with SQCC. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4695660/ /pubmed/26788508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/763080 Text en Copyright © 2015 Yang Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yang
Gao, Wen
Xu, Jiali
Chen, Xiaojun
Yang, Yang
Zhu, Yizhi
Yin, Yongmei
Guo, Renhua
Liu, Ping
Shu, Yongqian
Liu, Lingxiang
The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title_full The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title_fullStr The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title_full_unstemmed The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title_short The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
title_sort role of fgfr1 gene amplification as a poor prognostic factor in squamous cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of published data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/763080
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyang theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT gaowen theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT xujiali theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT chenxiaojun theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT yangyang theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT zhuyizhi theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT yinyongmei theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT guorenhua theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT liuping theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT shuyongqian theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT liulingxiang theroleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT wangyang roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT gaowen roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT xujiali roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT chenxiaojun roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT yangyang roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT zhuyizhi roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT yinyongmei roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT guorenhua roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT liuping roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT shuyongqian roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata
AT liulingxiang roleoffgfr1geneamplificationasapoorprognosticfactorinsquamouscelllungcancerametaanalysisofpublisheddata