Cargando…
An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
The use of biopolymers as a three dimensional (3D) support structure for cell growth is a leading tissue engineering approach in regenerative medicine. Achieving consistent cell seeding and uniform cell distribution throughout 3D scaffold culture in vitro is an ongoing challenge. Traditionally, 3D s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6041054 |
_version_ | 1782407718553780224 |
---|---|
author | Röder, Alexander García-Gareta, Elena Theodoropoulos, Christina Ristovski, Nikola Blackwood, Keith A. Woodruff, Maria A. |
author_facet | Röder, Alexander García-Gareta, Elena Theodoropoulos, Christina Ristovski, Nikola Blackwood, Keith A. Woodruff, Maria A. |
author_sort | Röder, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of biopolymers as a three dimensional (3D) support structure for cell growth is a leading tissue engineering approach in regenerative medicine. Achieving consistent cell seeding and uniform cell distribution throughout 3D scaffold culture in vitro is an ongoing challenge. Traditionally, 3D scaffolds are cultured within tissue culture plates to enable reproducible cell seeding and ease of culture media change. In this study, we compared two different well-plates with different surface properties to assess whether seeding efficiencies and cell growth on 3D scaffolds were affected. Cell attachment and growth of murine calvarial osteoblast (MC3T3-E1) cells within a melt-electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone scaffold were assessed when cultured in either “low-adhesive” non-treated or corona discharged-treated well-plates. Increased cell adhesion was observed on the scaffold placed in the surface treated culture plates compared to the scaffold in the non-treated plates 24 h after seeding, although it was not significant. However, higher cell metabolic activity was observed on the bases of all well-plates than on the scaffold, except for day 21, well metabolic activity was higher in the scaffold contained in non-treated plate than the base. These results indicate that there is no advantage in using non-treated plates to improve initial cell seeding in 3D polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds, however non-treated plates may provide an improved metabolic environment for long-term studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4695910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46959102016-01-19 An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Röder, Alexander García-Gareta, Elena Theodoropoulos, Christina Ristovski, Nikola Blackwood, Keith A. Woodruff, Maria A. J Funct Biomater Communication The use of biopolymers as a three dimensional (3D) support structure for cell growth is a leading tissue engineering approach in regenerative medicine. Achieving consistent cell seeding and uniform cell distribution throughout 3D scaffold culture in vitro is an ongoing challenge. Traditionally, 3D scaffolds are cultured within tissue culture plates to enable reproducible cell seeding and ease of culture media change. In this study, we compared two different well-plates with different surface properties to assess whether seeding efficiencies and cell growth on 3D scaffolds were affected. Cell attachment and growth of murine calvarial osteoblast (MC3T3-E1) cells within a melt-electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone scaffold were assessed when cultured in either “low-adhesive” non-treated or corona discharged-treated well-plates. Increased cell adhesion was observed on the scaffold placed in the surface treated culture plates compared to the scaffold in the non-treated plates 24 h after seeding, although it was not significant. However, higher cell metabolic activity was observed on the bases of all well-plates than on the scaffold, except for day 21, well metabolic activity was higher in the scaffold contained in non-treated plate than the base. These results indicate that there is no advantage in using non-treated plates to improve initial cell seeding in 3D polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds, however non-treated plates may provide an improved metabolic environment for long-term studies. MDPI 2015-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4695910/ /pubmed/26703748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6041054 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Röder, Alexander García-Gareta, Elena Theodoropoulos, Christina Ristovski, Nikola Blackwood, Keith A. Woodruff, Maria A. An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title | An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title_full | An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title_fullStr | An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title_full_unstemmed | An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title_short | An Assessment of Cell Culture Plate Surface Chemistry for in Vitro Studies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds |
title_sort | assessment of cell culture plate surface chemistry for in vitro studies of tissue engineering scaffolds |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26703748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6041054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roderalexander anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT garciagaretaelena anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT theodoropouloschristina anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT ristovskinikola anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT blackwoodkeitha anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT woodruffmariaa anassessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT roderalexander assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT garciagaretaelena assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT theodoropouloschristina assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT ristovskinikola assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT blackwoodkeitha assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds AT woodruffmariaa assessmentofcellcultureplatesurfacechemistryforinvitrostudiesoftissueengineeringscaffolds |