Cargando…
The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic respon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004 |
_version_ | 1782407732369817600 |
---|---|
author | Niederer, Steven Walker, Cameron Crozier, Andrew Hyde, Eoin R. Blazevic, Bojan Behar, Jonathan M. Claridge, Simon Sohal, Manav Shetty, Anoop Jackson, Tom Rinaldi, Christopher |
author_facet | Niederer, Steven Walker, Cameron Crozier, Andrew Hyde, Eoin R. Blazevic, Bojan Behar, Jonathan M. Claridge, Simon Sohal, Manav Shetty, Anoop Jackson, Tom Rinaldi, Christopher |
author_sort | Niederer, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic response (AHR) may help clinicians understand the link between acute measurements of cardiac function and long term clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective study of invasive pressure tracings from 38 patients receiving an acute pacing and electrophysiological study was performed. 602 pacing protocols for left ventricle (LV) (n = 38), atria–ventricle (AV) (n = 9), ventricle–ventricle (VV) (n = 12) and endocardial (ENDO) (n = 8) optimisation were performed. AHR was measured as the maximal rate of LV pressure development (dP/dt(Mx)) for each beat. The range of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean AHR was ~ 7% across all optimisation protocols compared with the reported CRT response cut off value of 10%. A single clear optimal protocol was identifiable in 61%, 22%, 25% and 50% for LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. A level of service (LOS) optimisation that aimed to maximise the expected AHR 5th percentile, minimising variability and maximising AHR, led to distinct optimal protocols from conventional mean AHR optimisation in 34%, 78%, 67% and 12.5% of LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The beat-to-beat variation in AHR is significant in the context of CRT cut off values. A LOS optimisation offers a novel index to identify the optimal pacing site that accounts for both the mean and variation of the baseline measurement and pacing protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4696127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46961272016-02-01 The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy Niederer, Steven Walker, Cameron Crozier, Andrew Hyde, Eoin R. Blazevic, Bojan Behar, Jonathan M. Claridge, Simon Sohal, Manav Shetty, Anoop Jackson, Tom Rinaldi, Christopher Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol Article BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic response (AHR) may help clinicians understand the link between acute measurements of cardiac function and long term clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective study of invasive pressure tracings from 38 patients receiving an acute pacing and electrophysiological study was performed. 602 pacing protocols for left ventricle (LV) (n = 38), atria–ventricle (AV) (n = 9), ventricle–ventricle (VV) (n = 12) and endocardial (ENDO) (n = 8) optimisation were performed. AHR was measured as the maximal rate of LV pressure development (dP/dt(Mx)) for each beat. The range of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean AHR was ~ 7% across all optimisation protocols compared with the reported CRT response cut off value of 10%. A single clear optimal protocol was identifiable in 61%, 22%, 25% and 50% for LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. A level of service (LOS) optimisation that aimed to maximise the expected AHR 5th percentile, minimising variability and maximising AHR, led to distinct optimal protocols from conventional mean AHR optimisation in 34%, 78%, 67% and 12.5% of LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The beat-to-beat variation in AHR is significant in the context of CRT cut off values. A LOS optimisation offers a novel index to identify the optimal pacing site that accounts for both the mean and variation of the baseline measurement and pacing protocol. Elsevier B.V 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4696127/ /pubmed/26844303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niederer, Steven Walker, Cameron Crozier, Andrew Hyde, Eoin R. Blazevic, Bojan Behar, Jonathan M. Claridge, Simon Sohal, Manav Shetty, Anoop Jackson, Tom Rinaldi, Christopher The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title | The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_full | The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_fullStr | The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_short | The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
title_sort | impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niederersteven theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT walkercameron theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT crozierandrew theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT hydeeoinr theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT blazevicbojan theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT beharjonathanm theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT claridgesimon theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT sohalmanav theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT shettyanoop theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT jacksontom theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT rinaldichristopher theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT niederersteven impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT walkercameron impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT crozierandrew impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT hydeeoinr impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT blazevicbojan impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT beharjonathanm impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT claridgesimon impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT sohalmanav impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT shettyanoop impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT jacksontom impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy AT rinaldichristopher impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy |