Cargando…

The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy

BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niederer, Steven, Walker, Cameron, Crozier, Andrew, Hyde, Eoin R., Blazevic, Bojan, Behar, Jonathan M., Claridge, Simon, Sohal, Manav, Shetty, Anoop, Jackson, Tom, Rinaldi, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004
_version_ 1782407732369817600
author Niederer, Steven
Walker, Cameron
Crozier, Andrew
Hyde, Eoin R.
Blazevic, Bojan
Behar, Jonathan M.
Claridge, Simon
Sohal, Manav
Shetty, Anoop
Jackson, Tom
Rinaldi, Christopher
author_facet Niederer, Steven
Walker, Cameron
Crozier, Andrew
Hyde, Eoin R.
Blazevic, Bojan
Behar, Jonathan M.
Claridge, Simon
Sohal, Manav
Shetty, Anoop
Jackson, Tom
Rinaldi, Christopher
author_sort Niederer, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic response (AHR) may help clinicians understand the link between acute measurements of cardiac function and long term clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective study of invasive pressure tracings from 38 patients receiving an acute pacing and electrophysiological study was performed. 602 pacing protocols for left ventricle (LV) (n = 38), atria–ventricle (AV) (n = 9), ventricle–ventricle (VV) (n = 12) and endocardial (ENDO) (n = 8) optimisation were performed. AHR was measured as the maximal rate of LV pressure development (dP/dt(Mx)) for each beat. The range of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean AHR was ~ 7% across all optimisation protocols compared with the reported CRT response cut off value of 10%. A single clear optimal protocol was identifiable in 61%, 22%, 25% and 50% for LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. A level of service (LOS) optimisation that aimed to maximise the expected AHR 5th percentile, minimising variability and maximising AHR, led to distinct optimal protocols from conventional mean AHR optimisation in 34%, 78%, 67% and 12.5% of LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The beat-to-beat variation in AHR is significant in the context of CRT cut off values. A LOS optimisation offers a novel index to identify the optimal pacing site that accounts for both the mean and variation of the baseline measurement and pacing protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4696127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier B.V
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46961272016-02-01 The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy Niederer, Steven Walker, Cameron Crozier, Andrew Hyde, Eoin R. Blazevic, Bojan Behar, Jonathan M. Claridge, Simon Sohal, Manav Shetty, Anoop Jackson, Tom Rinaldi, Christopher Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol Article BACKGROUND: Acute indicators of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) are critical for developing lead optimisation algorithms and evaluating novel multi-polar, multi-lead and endocardial pacing protocols. Accounting for beat-to-beat variability in measures of acute haemodynamic response (AHR) may help clinicians understand the link between acute measurements of cardiac function and long term clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective study of invasive pressure tracings from 38 patients receiving an acute pacing and electrophysiological study was performed. 602 pacing protocols for left ventricle (LV) (n = 38), atria–ventricle (AV) (n = 9), ventricle–ventricle (VV) (n = 12) and endocardial (ENDO) (n = 8) optimisation were performed. AHR was measured as the maximal rate of LV pressure development (dP/dt(Mx)) for each beat. The range of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean AHR was ~ 7% across all optimisation protocols compared with the reported CRT response cut off value of 10%. A single clear optimal protocol was identifiable in 61%, 22%, 25% and 50% for LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. A level of service (LOS) optimisation that aimed to maximise the expected AHR 5th percentile, minimising variability and maximising AHR, led to distinct optimal protocols from conventional mean AHR optimisation in 34%, 78%, 67% and 12.5% of LV, AV, VV and ENDO optimisation cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The beat-to-beat variation in AHR is significant in the context of CRT cut off values. A LOS optimisation offers a novel index to identify the optimal pacing site that accounts for both the mean and variation of the baseline measurement and pacing protocol. Elsevier B.V 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4696127/ /pubmed/26844303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niederer, Steven
Walker, Cameron
Crozier, Andrew
Hyde, Eoin R.
Blazevic, Bojan
Behar, Jonathan M.
Claridge, Simon
Sohal, Manav
Shetty, Anoop
Jackson, Tom
Rinaldi, Christopher
The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_full The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_fullStr The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_full_unstemmed The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_short The impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
title_sort impact of beat-to-beat variability in optimising the acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2015.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT niederersteven theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT walkercameron theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT crozierandrew theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT hydeeoinr theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT blazevicbojan theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT beharjonathanm theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT claridgesimon theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT sohalmanav theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT shettyanoop theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT jacksontom theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT rinaldichristopher theimpactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT niederersteven impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT walkercameron impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT crozierandrew impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT hydeeoinr impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT blazevicbojan impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT beharjonathanm impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT claridgesimon impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT sohalmanav impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT shettyanoop impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT jacksontom impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy
AT rinaldichristopher impactofbeattobeatvariabilityinoptimisingtheacutehemodynamicresponseincardiacresynchronisationtherapy