Cargando…

Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia

BACKGROUND: The American Urological Association (AUA) changed their Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) screening guidelines in 2013 to not recommend testing in men under 55 years of age without significant risk factors (such as a family history of prostate cancer or African ethnicity). The AUA argues t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dantanarayana, Nandu D., Hossack, Tania, Cozzi, Paul, Brooks, Andrew, Lau, Howard, Delprado, Warick, Patel, Manish I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0117-3
_version_ 1782407756428345344
author Dantanarayana, Nandu D.
Hossack, Tania
Cozzi, Paul
Brooks, Andrew
Lau, Howard
Delprado, Warick
Patel, Manish I.
author_facet Dantanarayana, Nandu D.
Hossack, Tania
Cozzi, Paul
Brooks, Andrew
Lau, Howard
Delprado, Warick
Patel, Manish I.
author_sort Dantanarayana, Nandu D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Urological Association (AUA) changed their Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) screening guidelines in 2013 to not recommend testing in men under 55 years of age without significant risk factors (such as a family history of prostate cancer or African ethnicity). The AUA argues that the rates of 'insignificant' prostate cancer (PC) in men under 55 are so high that the potential harms of PSA-testing in this population (over diagnosis and overtreatment) outweigh the benefits (early detection and treatment). Our study aims to identify and compare the rates of insignificant and high-risk PC in men diagnosed with PC ≤55 years and >55 years in two centres in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Men with an abnormal screening PSA or DRE and diagnosed with PC by prostate biopsy were included in this study. A consecutive series of men were accrued from two major urology centres between the years 2006 and 2014. The analysis was divided into two parts, the first compared PC biopsy characteristics between men aged ≤55 years and those >55 years. The second analysis compared the prostatectomy pathological characteristics between the two groups. Differences were analysed by Chi squared and significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 598 prostate biopsies and 723 prostatectomy matched subjects were included. On prostate biopsies, 14.0 % of men ≤55 years and 11.9 % of men >55 years had insignificant PC (X(2) = 0.32, df = 1, p = 0.57), whilst 24.7 % of men ≤55 years and 25.1 % of men >55 years had high-risk PC (X(2) = 0.007, df = 1, p = 0.93). On prostatectomy specimens, 9.1 % of men ≤55 years and 6.5 % of men >55 years had insignificant PC (X(2) = 1.25, df = 1, p = 0.26), whilst 20.0 % of men ≤55 years and 24.0 % of men >55 years had high-risk PC (X(2) = 0.83, df = 1, p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in the rates of insignificant and high-risk PC between men ≤55 years and >55 years, in either the prostate biopsies or prostatectomy specimens. Further trials need to be performed with comparable sample sizes and controlling of risk factors to assess the utility of PSA screening in younger men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4696233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46962332015-12-31 Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia Dantanarayana, Nandu D. Hossack, Tania Cozzi, Paul Brooks, Andrew Lau, Howard Delprado, Warick Patel, Manish I. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Urological Association (AUA) changed their Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) screening guidelines in 2013 to not recommend testing in men under 55 years of age without significant risk factors (such as a family history of prostate cancer or African ethnicity). The AUA argues that the rates of 'insignificant' prostate cancer (PC) in men under 55 are so high that the potential harms of PSA-testing in this population (over diagnosis and overtreatment) outweigh the benefits (early detection and treatment). Our study aims to identify and compare the rates of insignificant and high-risk PC in men diagnosed with PC ≤55 years and >55 years in two centres in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Men with an abnormal screening PSA or DRE and diagnosed with PC by prostate biopsy were included in this study. A consecutive series of men were accrued from two major urology centres between the years 2006 and 2014. The analysis was divided into two parts, the first compared PC biopsy characteristics between men aged ≤55 years and those >55 years. The second analysis compared the prostatectomy pathological characteristics between the two groups. Differences were analysed by Chi squared and significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 598 prostate biopsies and 723 prostatectomy matched subjects were included. On prostate biopsies, 14.0 % of men ≤55 years and 11.9 % of men >55 years had insignificant PC (X(2) = 0.32, df = 1, p = 0.57), whilst 24.7 % of men ≤55 years and 25.1 % of men >55 years had high-risk PC (X(2) = 0.007, df = 1, p = 0.93). On prostatectomy specimens, 9.1 % of men ≤55 years and 6.5 % of men >55 years had insignificant PC (X(2) = 1.25, df = 1, p = 0.26), whilst 20.0 % of men ≤55 years and 24.0 % of men >55 years had high-risk PC (X(2) = 0.83, df = 1, p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in the rates of insignificant and high-risk PC between men ≤55 years and >55 years, in either the prostate biopsies or prostatectomy specimens. Further trials need to be performed with comparable sample sizes and controlling of risk factors to assess the utility of PSA screening in younger men. BioMed Central 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4696233/ /pubmed/26715039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0117-3 Text en © Dantanarayana et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dantanarayana, Nandu D.
Hossack, Tania
Cozzi, Paul
Brooks, Andrew
Lau, Howard
Delprado, Warick
Patel, Manish I.
Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title_full Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title_fullStr Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title_short Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
title_sort men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0117-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dantanarayananandud menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT hossacktania menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT cozzipaul menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT brooksandrew menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT lauhoward menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT delpradowarick menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia
AT patelmanishi menundertheageof55yearswithscreendetectedprostatecancerdonothavelesssignificantdiseasecomparedtooldermeninapopulationofpatientsinaustralia