Cargando…
Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences
Purpose: To examine family perceptions of physiotherapy provided to relatives in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Method: Secondary thematic analysis of 65 in-depth narrative interviews with family members of people in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Results: Families place great...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25669235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1005759 |
_version_ | 1782407758628257792 |
---|---|
author | Latchem, Julie Kitzinger, Jenny Kitzinger, Celia |
author_facet | Latchem, Julie Kitzinger, Jenny Kitzinger, Celia |
author_sort | Latchem, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To examine family perceptions of physiotherapy provided to relatives in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Method: Secondary thematic analysis of 65 in-depth narrative interviews with family members of people in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Results: Families place great significance on physiotherapy in relation to six dimensions: “Caring for the person”, “Maximising comfort”, “Helping maintain health/life”, “Facilitating progress”, “Identifying or stimulating consciousness” and “Indicating potential for meaningful recovery”. They can have high expectations of what physiotherapy may deliver but also, at times, express concerns about physiotherapy’s potential to cause pain or distress, or even constitute a form of torture if they believe there is no hope for “meaningful” recovery. Conclusion: Physiotherapists can make an important contribution to supporting this patient group and their families but it is vital to recognise that family understandings of physiotherapy may differ significantly from those of physiotherapists. Both the delivery and the withdrawal of physiotherapy is highly symbolic and can convey (inadvertent) messages to people about their relative’s current and future state. A genuine two-way dialogue between practitioners and families about the aims of physiotherapeutic interventions, potential outcomes and patients’ best interests is critical to providing a good service and establishing positive relationships and appropriate treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Families of people in PVS or MCS consider physiotherapy as a vital part of good care. Clear communication is critical if therapeutic input is withdrawn or reduced. The purpose of physiotherapy interventions can be misinterpreted by family members. Physiotherapists need to clarify what physiotherapy can, and cannot, achieve. Families can find some interventions distressing to witness – explaining to families what interventions involve, what they can expect to see (and hear) may be helpful. Physiotherapists and families can attribute different meanings to physiotherapy. Physiotherapists need to identify how families view interventions and modify their explanations accordingly to enhance information sharing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4696242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46962422016-01-12 Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences Latchem, Julie Kitzinger, Jenny Kitzinger, Celia Disabil Rehabil Research Paper Purpose: To examine family perceptions of physiotherapy provided to relatives in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Method: Secondary thematic analysis of 65 in-depth narrative interviews with family members of people in vegetative or minimally conscious states. Results: Families place great significance on physiotherapy in relation to six dimensions: “Caring for the person”, “Maximising comfort”, “Helping maintain health/life”, “Facilitating progress”, “Identifying or stimulating consciousness” and “Indicating potential for meaningful recovery”. They can have high expectations of what physiotherapy may deliver but also, at times, express concerns about physiotherapy’s potential to cause pain or distress, or even constitute a form of torture if they believe there is no hope for “meaningful” recovery. Conclusion: Physiotherapists can make an important contribution to supporting this patient group and their families but it is vital to recognise that family understandings of physiotherapy may differ significantly from those of physiotherapists. Both the delivery and the withdrawal of physiotherapy is highly symbolic and can convey (inadvertent) messages to people about their relative’s current and future state. A genuine two-way dialogue between practitioners and families about the aims of physiotherapeutic interventions, potential outcomes and patients’ best interests is critical to providing a good service and establishing positive relationships and appropriate treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Families of people in PVS or MCS consider physiotherapy as a vital part of good care. Clear communication is critical if therapeutic input is withdrawn or reduced. The purpose of physiotherapy interventions can be misinterpreted by family members. Physiotherapists need to clarify what physiotherapy can, and cannot, achieve. Families can find some interventions distressing to witness – explaining to families what interventions involve, what they can expect to see (and hear) may be helpful. Physiotherapists and families can attribute different meanings to physiotherapy. Physiotherapists need to identify how families view interventions and modify their explanations accordingly to enhance information sharing. Informa Healthcare 2016-01-02 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4696242/ /pubmed/25669235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1005759 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Latchem, Julie Kitzinger, Jenny Kitzinger, Celia Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title | Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title_full | Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title_fullStr | Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title_short | Physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
title_sort | physiotherapy for vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: family perceptions and experiences |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25669235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1005759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT latchemjulie physiotherapyforvegetativeandminimallyconsciousstatepatientsfamilyperceptionsandexperiences AT kitzingerjenny physiotherapyforvegetativeandminimallyconsciousstatepatientsfamilyperceptionsandexperiences AT kitzingercelia physiotherapyforvegetativeandminimallyconsciousstatepatientsfamilyperceptionsandexperiences |