Cargando…

Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection

BACKGROUND: To develop a novel preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) test using next generation sequencing(NGS) as a alternative to current array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) method for detection of small segmental translocations in two patients with repeated implantation failure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ou, Jian, Wang, Wei, Feng, Tao, Liao, Lianming, Meng, Qingxia, Zou, Qinyan, Ding, Jie, Zheng, Aiyan, Duan, Chengying, Li, Peipei, Liu, Qiang, Lin, Chunhua, Li, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0207-7
_version_ 1782407760777838592
author Ou, Jian
Wang, Wei
Feng, Tao
Liao, Lianming
Meng, Qingxia
Zou, Qinyan
Ding, Jie
Zheng, Aiyan
Duan, Chengying
Li, Peipei
Liu, Qiang
Lin, Chunhua
Li, Hong
author_facet Ou, Jian
Wang, Wei
Feng, Tao
Liao, Lianming
Meng, Qingxia
Zou, Qinyan
Ding, Jie
Zheng, Aiyan
Duan, Chengying
Li, Peipei
Liu, Qiang
Lin, Chunhua
Li, Hong
author_sort Ou, Jian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To develop a novel preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) test using next generation sequencing(NGS) as a alternative to current array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) method for detection of small segmental translocations in two patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent miscarriage (RM). Inconsistent results were resolved by validation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). CASE PRESENTATION: One couple with normal cytogenetic and array CGH result suffered from implantation failure. Later NGS analysis showed 46,XY.ngs[GRCh37/hg19] 9p24.3-9p24.1(10,291-8,680,890×1),13q33.1-13q34(103,046,327-114,785,444×3). The other couple with normal cytogenetic and array CGH result also received NGS analysis. Due to the detected abnormal finding, which was 46,XY.ngs 4q34.3-4q35.2(179,673,982-191,016,503×3),6p25.3-6p22.3 (146,672-17,829,693×1), the couple decided against the corresponding embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS approach is a reliable alternative to array CGH for the discovery of small segmental translocations in patients with RIF and RM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4696251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46962512015-12-31 Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection Ou, Jian Wang, Wei Feng, Tao Liao, Lianming Meng, Qingxia Zou, Qinyan Ding, Jie Zheng, Aiyan Duan, Chengying Li, Peipei Liu, Qiang Lin, Chunhua Li, Hong Mol Cytogenet Case Report BACKGROUND: To develop a novel preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) test using next generation sequencing(NGS) as a alternative to current array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) method for detection of small segmental translocations in two patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent miscarriage (RM). Inconsistent results were resolved by validation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). CASE PRESENTATION: One couple with normal cytogenetic and array CGH result suffered from implantation failure. Later NGS analysis showed 46,XY.ngs[GRCh37/hg19] 9p24.3-9p24.1(10,291-8,680,890×1),13q33.1-13q34(103,046,327-114,785,444×3). The other couple with normal cytogenetic and array CGH result also received NGS analysis. Due to the detected abnormal finding, which was 46,XY.ngs 4q34.3-4q35.2(179,673,982-191,016,503×3),6p25.3-6p22.3 (146,672-17,829,693×1), the couple decided against the corresponding embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS approach is a reliable alternative to array CGH for the discovery of small segmental translocations in patients with RIF and RM. BioMed Central 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4696251/ /pubmed/26719770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0207-7 Text en © Ou et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ou, Jian
Wang, Wei
Feng, Tao
Liao, Lianming
Meng, Qingxia
Zou, Qinyan
Ding, Jie
Zheng, Aiyan
Duan, Chengying
Li, Peipei
Liu, Qiang
Lin, Chunhua
Li, Hong
Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_fullStr Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full_unstemmed Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_short Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_sort identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0207-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oujian identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT wangwei identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT fengtao identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT liaolianming identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT mengqingxia identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT zouqinyan identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT dingjie identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT zhengaiyan identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT duanchengying identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT lipeipei identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT liuqiang identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT linchunhua identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT lihong identificationofsmallsegmentaltranslocationsinpatientswithrepeatedimplantationfailureandrecurrentmiscarriageusingnextgenerationsequencingafterinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection