Cargando…

Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarenejad, Nafiseh, Asgary, Saeed, Ramazani, Nahid, Haghshenas, Mohammad Reza, Rafiei, Alireza, Ramazani, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759596
_version_ 1782407786243555328
author Zarenejad, Nafiseh
Asgary, Saeed
Ramazani, Nahid
Haghshenas, Mohammad Reza
Rafiei, Alireza
Ramazani, Mohsen
author_facet Zarenejad, Nafiseh
Asgary, Saeed
Ramazani, Nahid
Haghshenas, Mohammad Reza
Rafiei, Alireza
Ramazani, Mohsen
author_sort Zarenejad, Nafiseh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for 70 extracted human incisors without canal calcification, caries, restoration, resorption, or cracks. The teeth were then divided into three experimental using “Simple randomization allocation” (n = 20) and two control groups (n = 5). The three cements were applied as 3-mm intra-orifice barrier in test groups, and bleaching process was then conducted using a mixture of sodium perborate powder and distilled water, for 9 days. For leakage evaluation, bovine serum albumin marker was traced in a dual-chamber technique with Bradford indicator. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation leakage of samples from negative control, positive control, GI, MTA, and CEM cement groups were 0.0, 8.9 ± 0.03, 0.47 ± 0.02, 0.48 ± 0.02, and 0.49 ± 0.02 mg/mL, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between three experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that GI, MTA, and CEM cements are considered as suitable intra-orifice barrier to provide coronal seal during walking bleaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4696362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46963622016-01-12 Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching Zarenejad, Nafiseh Asgary, Saeed Ramazani, Nahid Haghshenas, Mohammad Reza Rafiei, Alireza Ramazani, Mohsen Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the microleakage of glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as coronal orifice barrier during walking bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, endodontic treatment was done for 70 extracted human incisors without canal calcification, caries, restoration, resorption, or cracks. The teeth were then divided into three experimental using “Simple randomization allocation” (n = 20) and two control groups (n = 5). The three cements were applied as 3-mm intra-orifice barrier in test groups, and bleaching process was then conducted using a mixture of sodium perborate powder and distilled water, for 9 days. For leakage evaluation, bovine serum albumin marker was traced in a dual-chamber technique with Bradford indicator. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation leakage of samples from negative control, positive control, GI, MTA, and CEM cement groups were 0.0, 8.9 ± 0.03, 0.47 ± 0.02, 0.48 ± 0.02, and 0.49 ± 0.02 mg/mL, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between three experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that GI, MTA, and CEM cements are considered as suitable intra-orifice barrier to provide coronal seal during walking bleaching. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4696362/ /pubmed/26759596 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zarenejad, Nafiseh
Asgary, Saeed
Ramazani, Nahid
Haghshenas, Mohammad Reza
Rafiei, Alireza
Ramazani, Mohsen
Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_full Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_fullStr Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_full_unstemmed Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_short Coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
title_sort coronal microleakage of three different dental biomaterials as intra-orifice barrier during nonvital bleaching
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759596
work_keys_str_mv AT zarenejadnafiseh coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT asgarysaeed coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT ramazaninahid coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT haghshenasmohammadreza coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT rafieialireza coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching
AT ramazanimohsen coronalmicroleakageofthreedifferentdentalbiomaterialsasintraorificebarrierduringnonvitalbleaching