Cargando…

Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories

The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in the emotional evaluation of 18 film clips divided into six categories: Erotic, Scenery, Neutral, Sadness, Compassion, and Fear. 41 female and 40 male students rated all clips for valence-pleasantness, arousal, level of elicited distress, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maffei, Antonio, Vencato, Valentina, Angrilli, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145562
_version_ 1782407844382900224
author Maffei, Antonio
Vencato, Valentina
Angrilli, Alessandro
author_facet Maffei, Antonio
Vencato, Valentina
Angrilli, Alessandro
author_sort Maffei, Antonio
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in the emotional evaluation of 18 film clips divided into six categories: Erotic, Scenery, Neutral, Sadness, Compassion, and Fear. 41 female and 40 male students rated all clips for valence-pleasantness, arousal, level of elicited distress, anxiety, jittery feelings, excitation, and embarrassment. Analysis of positive films revealed higher levels of arousal, pleasantness, and excitation to the Scenery clips in both genders, but lower pleasantness and greater embarrassment in women compared to men to Erotic clips. Concerning unpleasant stimuli, unlike men, women reported more unpleasantness to the Compassion, Sadness, and Fear compared to the Neutral clips and rated them also as more arousing than did men. They further differentiated the films by perceiving greater arousal to Fear than to Compassion clips. Women rated the Sadness and Fear clips with greater Distress and Jittery feelings than men did. Correlation analysis between arousal and the other emotional scales revealed that, although men looked less aroused than women to all unpleasant clips, they also showed a larger variance in their emotional responses as indicated by the high number of correlations and their relatively greater extent, an outcome pointing to a masked larger sensitivity of part of male sample to emotional clips. We propose a new perspective in which gender difference in emotional responses can be better evidenced by means of film clips selected and clustered in more homogeneous categories, controlled for arousal levels, as well as evaluated through a number of emotion focused adjectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4696842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46968422016-01-13 Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories Maffei, Antonio Vencato, Valentina Angrilli, Alessandro PLoS One Research Article The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in the emotional evaluation of 18 film clips divided into six categories: Erotic, Scenery, Neutral, Sadness, Compassion, and Fear. 41 female and 40 male students rated all clips for valence-pleasantness, arousal, level of elicited distress, anxiety, jittery feelings, excitation, and embarrassment. Analysis of positive films revealed higher levels of arousal, pleasantness, and excitation to the Scenery clips in both genders, but lower pleasantness and greater embarrassment in women compared to men to Erotic clips. Concerning unpleasant stimuli, unlike men, women reported more unpleasantness to the Compassion, Sadness, and Fear compared to the Neutral clips and rated them also as more arousing than did men. They further differentiated the films by perceiving greater arousal to Fear than to Compassion clips. Women rated the Sadness and Fear clips with greater Distress and Jittery feelings than men did. Correlation analysis between arousal and the other emotional scales revealed that, although men looked less aroused than women to all unpleasant clips, they also showed a larger variance in their emotional responses as indicated by the high number of correlations and their relatively greater extent, an outcome pointing to a masked larger sensitivity of part of male sample to emotional clips. We propose a new perspective in which gender difference in emotional responses can be better evidenced by means of film clips selected and clustered in more homogeneous categories, controlled for arousal levels, as well as evaluated through a number of emotion focused adjectives. Public Library of Science 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4696842/ /pubmed/26717488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145562 Text en © 2015 Maffei et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maffei, Antonio
Vencato, Valentina
Angrilli, Alessandro
Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title_full Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title_short Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories
title_sort sex differences in emotional evaluation of film clips: interaction with five high arousal emotional categories
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145562
work_keys_str_mv AT maffeiantonio sexdifferencesinemotionalevaluationoffilmclipsinteractionwithfivehigharousalemotionalcategories
AT vencatovalentina sexdifferencesinemotionalevaluationoffilmclipsinteractionwithfivehigharousalemotionalcategories
AT angrillialessandro sexdifferencesinemotionalevaluationoffilmclipsinteractionwithfivehigharousalemotionalcategories