Cargando…

Relationship between Preoperative (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Status in Primary Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Both (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status are prognostic variables of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between (18)F-FDG uptake on preoperative positron emission tomography/comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yun Jung, Kim, Min Jeong, Lee, Bong Hwa, Kwon, Mi Jung, Hwang, Hee Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.232
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Both (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status are prognostic variables of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between (18)F-FDG uptake on preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and EGFR status in primary CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 132 patients (66 men and 66 women; mean age=67.1±11.1 years) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for CRC staging and subsequent bowel resection were reviewed. In primary lesions, (18)F-FDG uptake was semiquantitatively evaluated in terms of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), and EGFR status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Associations of clinicopathological parameters and EGFR status were analyzed by Pearson's chi-square test, multiple logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (65.2%) showed EGFR expression. SUV(max) was significantly lower in EGFR-negative tumors than in EGFR-expressing tumors (10.0±4.2 vs. 12.1±2.1; p=0.012). It was the only significant parameter correlated with EGFR expression (odds ratio=2.457; relative risk=2.013; p=0.038). At the SUV(max) threshold of 7.5, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting EGFR expression were 84.9% and 40.4%, respectively (area under the curve=0.624; p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Preoperative (18)F-FDG uptake is slightly correlated with EGFR status in primary CRC. Preoperative SUV(max) of (18)F-FDG may have a limited role in predicting EGFR expression in such tumors because of its poor specificity.