Cargando…
Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study
PURPOSE: The aim this study was to compare the accuracy of orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists in identifying 17 commonly used cephalometric landmarks, and to determine the extent of variability associated with each of those landmarks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty digital lateral ceph...
Autores principales: | Durão, Ana Paula Reis, Morosolli, Aline, Pittayapat, Pisha, Bolstad, Napat, Ferreira, Afonso P., Jacobs, Reinhilde |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26730368 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review
por: Durão, Ana R, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Reproducibility of the sella turcica landmark in three dimensions using a sella turcica-specific reference system
por: Pittayapat, Pisha, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
por: Ye, Huayu, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
por: Belmans, Niels, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial radiology
por: Gokdeniz, Seyide Tugce, et al.
Publicado: (2022)