Cargando…
Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation
Conventional drug screening processes are a time-consuming and expensive endeavor, but highly rewarding when they are successful. To identify promising lead compounds, millions of compounds are traditionally screened against therapeutic targets on human cells grown on the surface of 96-wells. These...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios5040647 |
_version_ | 1782407892548190208 |
---|---|
author | Datar, Akshata Joshi, Pranav Lee, Moo-Yeal |
author_facet | Datar, Akshata Joshi, Pranav Lee, Moo-Yeal |
author_sort | Datar, Akshata |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conventional drug screening processes are a time-consuming and expensive endeavor, but highly rewarding when they are successful. To identify promising lead compounds, millions of compounds are traditionally screened against therapeutic targets on human cells grown on the surface of 96-wells. These two-dimensional (2D) cell monolayers are physiologically irrelevant, thus, often providing false-positive or false-negative results, when compared to cells grown in three-dimensional (3D) structures such as hydrogel droplets. However, 3D cell culture systems are not easily amenable to high-throughput screening (HTS), thus inherently low throughput, and requiring relatively large volume for cell-based assays. In addition, it is difficult to control cellular microenvironments and hard to obtain reliable cell images due to focus position and transparency issues. To overcome these problems, miniaturized 3D cell cultures in hydrogels were developed via cell printing techniques where cell spots in hydrogels can be arrayed on the surface of glass slides or plastic chips by microarray spotters and cultured in growth media to form cells encapsulated 3D droplets for various cell-based assays. These approaches can dramatically reduce assay volume, provide accurate control over cellular microenvironments, and allow us to obtain clear 3D cell images for high-content imaging (HCI). In this review, several hydrogels that are compatible to microarray printing robots are discussed for miniaturized 3D cell cultures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4697138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46971382016-01-19 Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation Datar, Akshata Joshi, Pranav Lee, Moo-Yeal Biosensors (Basel) Review Conventional drug screening processes are a time-consuming and expensive endeavor, but highly rewarding when they are successful. To identify promising lead compounds, millions of compounds are traditionally screened against therapeutic targets on human cells grown on the surface of 96-wells. These two-dimensional (2D) cell monolayers are physiologically irrelevant, thus, often providing false-positive or false-negative results, when compared to cells grown in three-dimensional (3D) structures such as hydrogel droplets. However, 3D cell culture systems are not easily amenable to high-throughput screening (HTS), thus inherently low throughput, and requiring relatively large volume for cell-based assays. In addition, it is difficult to control cellular microenvironments and hard to obtain reliable cell images due to focus position and transparency issues. To overcome these problems, miniaturized 3D cell cultures in hydrogels were developed via cell printing techniques where cell spots in hydrogels can be arrayed on the surface of glass slides or plastic chips by microarray spotters and cultured in growth media to form cells encapsulated 3D droplets for various cell-based assays. These approaches can dramatically reduce assay volume, provide accurate control over cellular microenvironments, and allow us to obtain clear 3D cell images for high-content imaging (HCI). In this review, several hydrogels that are compatible to microarray printing robots are discussed for miniaturized 3D cell cultures. MDPI 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4697138/ /pubmed/26516921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios5040647 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Datar, Akshata Joshi, Pranav Lee, Moo-Yeal Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title | Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title_full | Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title_fullStr | Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title_short | Biocompatible Hydrogels for Microarray Cell Printing and Encapsulation |
title_sort | biocompatible hydrogels for microarray cell printing and encapsulation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios5040647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT datarakshata biocompatiblehydrogelsformicroarraycellprintingandencapsulation AT joshipranav biocompatiblehydrogelsformicroarraycellprintingandencapsulation AT leemooyeal biocompatiblehydrogelsformicroarraycellprintingandencapsulation |