Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644 |
_version_ | 1782407905100693504 |
---|---|
author | Chohan, Hitesh Dewan, Harisha Annapoorna, B. M. Manjunath, M. K. |
author_facet | Chohan, Hitesh Dewan, Harisha Annapoorna, B. M. Manjunath, M. K. |
author_sort | Chohan, Hitesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavior of four different root-end filling materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The roots were resected at the level of 3 mm perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. Root-end cavities were prepared with straight fissure stainless steel bur. The teeth were then divided into four experimental and two control groups, and cavities restored as per the groupings. The teeth were immersed in methylene blue for 48 h, split longitudinally, and dye penetration was measured. RESULTS: A highly significant difference existed in the mean dye penetration of Group I (conventional glass ionomer) and the other groups (resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite, and composite resin). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of conventional glass ionomer cement and other groups. (2) No statistically significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of groups II, III, and IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4697234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46972342016-01-12 Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study Chohan, Hitesh Dewan, Harisha Annapoorna, B. M. Manjunath, M. K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavior of four different root-end filling materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The roots were resected at the level of 3 mm perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. Root-end cavities were prepared with straight fissure stainless steel bur. The teeth were then divided into four experimental and two control groups, and cavities restored as per the groupings. The teeth were immersed in methylene blue for 48 h, split longitudinally, and dye penetration was measured. RESULTS: A highly significant difference existed in the mean dye penetration of Group I (conventional glass ionomer) and the other groups (resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite, and composite resin). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of conventional glass ionomer cement and other groups. (2) No statistically significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of groups II, III, and IV. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4697234/ /pubmed/26759803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chohan, Hitesh Dewan, Harisha Annapoorna, B. M. Manjunath, M. K. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chohanhitesh comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT dewanharisha comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT annapoornabm comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT manjunathmk comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy |