Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chohan, Hitesh, Dewan, Harisha, Annapoorna, B. M., Manjunath, M. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644
_version_ 1782407905100693504
author Chohan, Hitesh
Dewan, Harisha
Annapoorna, B. M.
Manjunath, M. K.
author_facet Chohan, Hitesh
Dewan, Harisha
Annapoorna, B. M.
Manjunath, M. K.
author_sort Chohan, Hitesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavior of four different root-end filling materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The roots were resected at the level of 3 mm perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. Root-end cavities were prepared with straight fissure stainless steel bur. The teeth were then divided into four experimental and two control groups, and cavities restored as per the groupings. The teeth were immersed in methylene blue for 48 h, split longitudinally, and dye penetration was measured. RESULTS: A highly significant difference existed in the mean dye penetration of Group I (conventional glass ionomer) and the other groups (resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite, and composite resin). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of conventional glass ionomer cement and other groups. (2) No statistically significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of groups II, III, and IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4697234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46972342016-01-12 Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study Chohan, Hitesh Dewan, Harisha Annapoorna, B. M. Manjunath, M. K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Root-end filling is a prudent procedure aimed at sealing the root canal to prevent penetration of tissue fluids into the root canals. An ideal root-end filling material should produce a complete apical seal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the leakage behavior of four different root-end filling materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The roots were resected at the level of 3 mm perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. Root-end cavities were prepared with straight fissure stainless steel bur. The teeth were then divided into four experimental and two control groups, and cavities restored as per the groupings. The teeth were immersed in methylene blue for 48 h, split longitudinally, and dye penetration was measured. RESULTS: A highly significant difference existed in the mean dye penetration of Group I (conventional glass ionomer) and the other groups (resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite, and composite resin). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of conventional glass ionomer cement and other groups. (2) No statistically significant difference was found in the dye penetration values of groups II, III, and IV. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4697234/ /pubmed/26759803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chohan, Hitesh
Dewan, Harisha
Annapoorna, B. M.
Manjunath, M. K.
Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.168644
work_keys_str_mv AT chohanhitesh comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT dewanharisha comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT annapoornabm comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT manjunathmk comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofglassionomerresincontinuumasrootendfillingmaterialsaninvitrostudy