Cargando…
Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681 |
_version_ | 1782407914033512448 |
---|---|
author | Voon, Valerie |
author_facet | Voon, Valerie |
author_sort | Voon, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsivity, compulsivity, attentional biases to food cues, and executive function. Behavioral regulation in BED appears to be influenced by the context of motivationally salient food cues and the degree of obesity. Deficits in delay discounting and risk taking under ambiguity are impaired in obesity irrespective of BED status. However, in BED subjects with milder obesity, greater risk seeking under explicit probabilistic risk is observed to monetary rewards, whereas this shifts to risk aversion and enhanced delay discounting in more severe obesity. Relative to non-BED obese subjects, BED is characterized by enhanced behavioral inflexibility or compulsivity across multiple domains, with subjects selecting the same choices despite change in relevance (set shifting), being no longer rewarding (habit formation), or irrespective of outcome (perseveration). The context of food cues was associated with multiple attentional and early and late inhibitory impairments and enhanced memory bias, although BED patients also have generalized cognitive interference in working memory. These findings may help explain the phenotype of binge eating. Motivationally salient food cues provoke attentional and memory biases along with impairing response inhibitory processes. Those with BED are also more susceptible to cognitive interference and have impaired decisional impulsivity, with the tendency to inflexibly stick with the same choices irrespective of changes in context. These findings suggest critical cognitive domains that may guide therapeutic interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4697296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46972962016-01-04 Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making Voon, Valerie CNS Spectr Review Articles Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsivity, compulsivity, attentional biases to food cues, and executive function. Behavioral regulation in BED appears to be influenced by the context of motivationally salient food cues and the degree of obesity. Deficits in delay discounting and risk taking under ambiguity are impaired in obesity irrespective of BED status. However, in BED subjects with milder obesity, greater risk seeking under explicit probabilistic risk is observed to monetary rewards, whereas this shifts to risk aversion and enhanced delay discounting in more severe obesity. Relative to non-BED obese subjects, BED is characterized by enhanced behavioral inflexibility or compulsivity across multiple domains, with subjects selecting the same choices despite change in relevance (set shifting), being no longer rewarding (habit formation), or irrespective of outcome (perseveration). The context of food cues was associated with multiple attentional and early and late inhibitory impairments and enhanced memory bias, although BED patients also have generalized cognitive interference in working memory. These findings may help explain the phenotype of binge eating. Motivationally salient food cues provoke attentional and memory biases along with impairing response inhibitory processes. Those with BED are also more susceptible to cognitive interference and have impaired decisional impulsivity, with the tendency to inflexibly stick with the same choices irrespective of changes in context. These findings suggest critical cognitive domains that may guide therapeutic interventions. Cambridge University Press 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4697296/ /pubmed/26594850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2015 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence 〈http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/〉.The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Voon, Valerie Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title | Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title_full | Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title_fullStr | Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title_short | Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
title_sort | cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voonvalerie cognitivebiasesinbingeeatingdisorderthehijackingofdecisionmaking |