Cargando…

Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making

Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Voon, Valerie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681
_version_ 1782407914033512448
author Voon, Valerie
author_facet Voon, Valerie
author_sort Voon, Valerie
collection PubMed
description Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsivity, compulsivity, attentional biases to food cues, and executive function. Behavioral regulation in BED appears to be influenced by the context of motivationally salient food cues and the degree of obesity. Deficits in delay discounting and risk taking under ambiguity are impaired in obesity irrespective of BED status. However, in BED subjects with milder obesity, greater risk seeking under explicit probabilistic risk is observed to monetary rewards, whereas this shifts to risk aversion and enhanced delay discounting in more severe obesity. Relative to non-BED obese subjects, BED is characterized by enhanced behavioral inflexibility or compulsivity across multiple domains, with subjects selecting the same choices despite change in relevance (set shifting), being no longer rewarding (habit formation), or irrespective of outcome (perseveration). The context of food cues was associated with multiple attentional and early and late inhibitory impairments and enhanced memory bias, although BED patients also have generalized cognitive interference in working memory. These findings may help explain the phenotype of binge eating. Motivationally salient food cues provoke attentional and memory biases along with impairing response inhibitory processes. Those with BED are also more susceptible to cognitive interference and have impaired decisional impulsivity, with the tendency to inflexibly stick with the same choices irrespective of changes in context. These findings suggest critical cognitive domains that may guide therapeutic interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4697296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46972962016-01-04 Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making Voon, Valerie CNS Spectr Review Articles Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common of eating disorders and is characterized by excessive, out-of-control, rapid food intake. This review focuses on cognitive impairments in BED, which represent an endophenotype that mediates brain function and behavior. Here we focus on reviewing impulsivity, compulsivity, attentional biases to food cues, and executive function. Behavioral regulation in BED appears to be influenced by the context of motivationally salient food cues and the degree of obesity. Deficits in delay discounting and risk taking under ambiguity are impaired in obesity irrespective of BED status. However, in BED subjects with milder obesity, greater risk seeking under explicit probabilistic risk is observed to monetary rewards, whereas this shifts to risk aversion and enhanced delay discounting in more severe obesity. Relative to non-BED obese subjects, BED is characterized by enhanced behavioral inflexibility or compulsivity across multiple domains, with subjects selecting the same choices despite change in relevance (set shifting), being no longer rewarding (habit formation), or irrespective of outcome (perseveration). The context of food cues was associated with multiple attentional and early and late inhibitory impairments and enhanced memory bias, although BED patients also have generalized cognitive interference in working memory. These findings may help explain the phenotype of binge eating. Motivationally salient food cues provoke attentional and memory biases along with impairing response inhibitory processes. Those with BED are also more susceptible to cognitive interference and have impaired decisional impulsivity, with the tendency to inflexibly stick with the same choices irrespective of changes in context. These findings suggest critical cognitive domains that may guide therapeutic interventions. Cambridge University Press 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4697296/ /pubmed/26594850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2015 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence 〈http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/〉.The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use
spellingShingle Review Articles
Voon, Valerie
Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title_full Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title_fullStr Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title_short Cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
title_sort cognitive biases in binge eating disorder: the hijacking of decision making
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852915000681
work_keys_str_mv AT voonvalerie cognitivebiasesinbingeeatingdisorderthehijackingofdecisionmaking