Cargando…

Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine contraceptive device is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. The intrauterine contraceptive device can perforate the uterus and can also migrate into pelvic or abdominal organs. Perforation of the urinary bladder by an intrauterine contraceptive devic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gyasi-Sarpong, Christian Kofi, Maison, Patrick Opoku Manu, Morhe, Emmanuel, Aboah, Ken, Appiah, Kwaku Addai-Arhin, Azorliade, Roland, Baah-Nyamekye, Kofi, Otu-Boateng, Kwaku, Amoah, George, Antwi, Isaac, Frimpong-Twumasi, Benjamin, Arthur, Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4698325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26724805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1792-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intrauterine contraceptive device is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. The intrauterine contraceptive device can perforate the uterus and can also migrate into pelvic or abdominal organs. Perforation of the urinary bladder by an intrauterine contraceptive device is not common. In West Africa, intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device has been rarely reported. In this report, we present a case of an intrauterine contraceptive device migration into the urinary bladder of a 33 year old African woman at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. CASE REPORT: A 33 year old African woman presented with persistent urinary tract infection of 7 months duration despite appropriate antibiotic treatments. An abdominal ultrasonography revealed a urinary bladder calculus which was found to be an intrauterine contraceptive device on removal at cystoscopy. She got pregnant whilst having the intrauterine contraceptive device in place and delivered at term. CONCLUSION: The presence of recurrent or persistent urinary tract infection in any woman with an intrauterine contraceptive device should raise the suspicion of intravesical migration of the intrauterine contraceptive device.