Cargando…
Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial
Aim. Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients. Methods. Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4698561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3248547 |
_version_ | 1782408046690959360 |
---|---|
author | Johansson, Tim Keller, Sophie Winkler, Henrike Ostermann, Thomas Weitgasser, Raimund Sönnichsen, Andreas C. |
author_facet | Johansson, Tim Keller, Sophie Winkler, Henrike Ostermann, Thomas Weitgasser, Raimund Sönnichsen, Andreas C. |
author_sort | Johansson, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim. Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients. Methods. Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible, n = 337 participated (intervention: 148 in 19 clusters; control: 189 in 20 clusters). The peer support intervention ran over 24 months and consisted of peer supporter recruitment and training, and group meetings weekly for physical exercise and monthly for discussion of diabetes related topics. Results. At two-year follow-up, adjusted analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in HbA(1c) change of 0.14% (21.97 mmol/mol) in favour of the intervention (95% CI −0.08 to 0.36%, p = 0.22). Baseline values were 7.02 ± 1.25% in the intervention and 7.08 ± 1.25 in the control group. None of the secondary outcome measures showed significant differences except for improved quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS) in controls (4.3 points on a scale of 100; 95% CI 0.08 to 8.53, p = 0.046) compared to the intervention group. Conclusion. Our peer support intervention as an additional DMP component showed no significant effect on HbA(1c) and secondary outcome measures. Further RTCs with a longer follow-up are needed to reveal whether peer support will have clinically relevant effects. Trial Registration. This trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ISRCTN10291077). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4698561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46985612016-02-08 Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial Johansson, Tim Keller, Sophie Winkler, Henrike Ostermann, Thomas Weitgasser, Raimund Sönnichsen, Andreas C. J Diabetes Res Clinical Study Aim. Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients. Methods. Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible, n = 337 participated (intervention: 148 in 19 clusters; control: 189 in 20 clusters). The peer support intervention ran over 24 months and consisted of peer supporter recruitment and training, and group meetings weekly for physical exercise and monthly for discussion of diabetes related topics. Results. At two-year follow-up, adjusted analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in HbA(1c) change of 0.14% (21.97 mmol/mol) in favour of the intervention (95% CI −0.08 to 0.36%, p = 0.22). Baseline values were 7.02 ± 1.25% in the intervention and 7.08 ± 1.25 in the control group. None of the secondary outcome measures showed significant differences except for improved quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS) in controls (4.3 points on a scale of 100; 95% CI 0.08 to 8.53, p = 0.046) compared to the intervention group. Conclusion. Our peer support intervention as an additional DMP component showed no significant effect on HbA(1c) and secondary outcome measures. Further RTCs with a longer follow-up are needed to reveal whether peer support will have clinically relevant effects. Trial Registration. This trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ISRCTN10291077). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2015-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4698561/ /pubmed/26858958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3248547 Text en Copyright © 2016 Tim Johansson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Johansson, Tim Keller, Sophie Winkler, Henrike Ostermann, Thomas Weitgasser, Raimund Sönnichsen, Andreas C. Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title | Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of a peer support programme versus usual care in disease management of diabetes mellitus type 2 regarding improvement of metabolic control: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4698561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3248547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johanssontim effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kellersophie effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT winklerhenrike effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ostermannthomas effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weitgasserraimund effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sonnichsenandreasc effectivenessofapeersupportprogrammeversususualcareindiseasemanagementofdiabetesmellitustype2regardingimprovementofmetaboliccontrolaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |