Cargando…

Implant success rates in full-arch rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants: a retrospective investigation with up to five years of follow-up

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the cumulative success rate, the implant survival rate, and the occurrence of biological complications in implants supporting full-arch immediately loaded rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants. METHODS: The clinical r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francetti, Luca, Rodolfi, Andrea, Barbaro, Bruno, Taschieri, Silvio, Cavalli, Nicolò, Corbella, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4698947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734491
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.6.210
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the cumulative success rate, the implant survival rate, and the occurrence of biological complications in implants supporting full-arch immediately loaded rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants. METHODS: The clinical records and periapical radiographs of patients who attended follow-up visits were collected, and information was recorded regarding marginal bone loss resorption, the occurrence of peri-implant infectious diseases, and the implant survival rate. Implants were classified as successful or not successful according to two distinct classifications for implant success. RESULTS: A total of 53 maxillary and mandibular restorations including 212 implants were analysed, of which 56 implants were studied over the full five-year follow-up period. After five years, the cumulative success rate was 76.04% according to the Misch classification and 56.34% according to the Albrektsson classification. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%, although one implant was found to be affected by peri-implantitis at the second follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative success rate of the implants dropped over time, corresponding to the progression of marginal bone resorption. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was very low, and the implant survival rate was not found to be related to the cumulative success rate.